Yu Cong Eng v. Trinidad
From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
| Yu Cong Eng v. Trinidad | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
| Argued April 12–13, 1926 Decided June 7, 1926 |
|||||
| Full case name | Yu Cong Eng, et al. v. Trinidad, Collector, et al. | ||||
| Citations | 271 U.S. 500 (more)
46 S. Ct. 619; 70 L. Ed. 1059; 1926 U.S. LEXIS 642
|
||||
| Prior history | Supreme Court of the Philippines | ||||
| Holding | |||||
| The Chinese Bookkeeping Act violated the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Philippine Autonomy Act. | |||||
| Court membership | |||||
|
|||||
| Case opinions | |||||
| Majority | Taft, joined by unanimous | ||||
| Laws applied | |||||
| Philippine Autonomy Act | |||||
Yu Cong Eng v. Trinidad, 271 U.S. 500 (1926), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a law passed by the US colonial government of the Philippines in 1921, Act No. 2972 of the Philippine Legislature, known as the "Chinese Bookkeeping Act," was unconstitutional. It prevented business records from being kept in the Chinese language.
External links
<templatestyles src="Asbox/styles.css"></templatestyles>
|
This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
Categories:
- Navbox orphans
- 1926 in United States case law
- Legal history of the Philippines
- Linguistic rights
- United States Supreme Court cases
- China–Philippines relations
- Anti-Chinese sentiment in the United States
- History of Manila
- American colonial period of the Philippines
- United States Supreme Court cases of the Taft Court
- United States Supreme Court stubs
