United Zinc & Chemical Co. v. Britt
From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
| United Zinc & Chemical Co. v. Britt | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
| Submitted March 13, 1922 Decided March 27, 1922 |
|||||
| Full case name | United Zinc & Chemical Co. v. Britt | ||||
| Citations | 258 U.S. 268 (more) | ||||
| Prior history | Kans.Gen.Stats., 1915, §7323, 7324 264 F.7d 5 (8th Cir.) |
||||
| Holding | |||||
| Judgement reversed. | |||||
| Court membership | |||||
|
|||||
| Case opinions | |||||
| Majority | Holmes | ||||
| Dissent | Clarke, joined by Taft, Day | ||||
United Zinc & Chemical Co. v. Britt, 258 U.S. 268 (1922), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that limited liability for landowners regarding injuries to child trespassers.
Holding
The court held that a landowner was not liable under the attractive nuisance doctrine if the child had not been attracted to the land by the condition that injured him. This case has since been overturned.
