United States House of Representatives elections, 1900

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

Lua error in Module:Infobox at line 271: malformed pattern (missing ']').

Elections to the United States House of Representatives were held in 1900 for members of the 57th Congress, coinciding with the re-election of President William McKinley.

McKinley's Republican Party gained thirteen seats from the Democratic Party and minor parties, cementing their majority. A reassertion of Republican control in the Mid-Atlantic was key in the gain of new seats. However, with an improved economy, especially in the industrial sector, the election cycle featured no keystone issue, resulting in a general support for the status quo. The fading Populist Party held on to five House seats, while the sole member of the Silver Party changed parties to Democratic.

Election summaries

↓
200 1 5 151
Republican SR P Democratic
State Type Total
seats
Republican Democratic Populist Silver/
Silver Republican
Seats Change Seats Change Seats Change Seats Change
Alabama District 9 0 Decrease 1 9 Increase 1 0 Steady 0 Steady
Arkansas District 6 0 Steady 6 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady
California District 7 7 Increase 1 0 Decrease 1 0 Steady 0 Steady
Colorado District 2 0 Steady 0 Steady 1 Steady 1[Note 3] Steady
Connecticut District 4 4 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady
Delaware At-large 1 1 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady
Florida District 2 0 Steady 2 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady
Georgia District 11 0 Steady 11 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady
Idaho At-large 1 0 Steady 0 Steady 1 Increase 1 0 Decrease 1[Note 4]
Illinois District 22 11 Decrease 3 11 Increase 3 0 Steady 0 Steady
Indiana District 13 9 Steady 4 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady
Iowa District 11 11 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady
Kansas District
+at-large
8 7 Steady 1 Increase 1 0 Decrease 1 0 Steady
Kentucky District 11 3 Increase 1 8 Decrease 1 0 Steady 0 Steady
Louisiana District 6 0 Steady 6 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady
Maine[Note 5] District 4 4 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady
Maryland District 6 6 Increase 2 0 Decrease 2 0 Steady 0 Steady
Massachusetts District 13 10 Steady 3 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady
Michigan District 12 12 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady
Minnesota District 7 7 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady
Mississippi District 7 0 Steady 7 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady
Missouri District 15 3[Note 6] Steady 12 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady
Montana At-large 1 0 Steady 0 Decrease 1 1 Increase 1 0 Steady
Nebraska District 6 2 Steady 2 Increase 1 2 Decrease 1 0 Steady
Nevada At-large 1 0 Steady 1 Increase 1 0 Steady 0 Decrease 1[Note 7]
New Hampshire District 2 2 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady
New Jersey District 8 6 Steady 2 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady
New York District 34 21 Increase 5 13 Decrease 5 0 Steady 0 Steady
North Carolina District 9 2 Steady 7 Increase 1 0 Decrease 1 0 Steady
North Dakota At-large 1 1 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady
Ohio District 21 17 Increase 2 4 Decrease 2 0 Steady 0 Steady
Oregon[Note 5] District 2 2 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady
Pennsylvania District
+2 at-large
30 26 Increase 6 4 Decrease 6 0 Steady 0 Steady
Rhode Island District 2 2 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady
South Carolina District 7 0 Steady 7 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady
South Dakota At-large 2 2 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady
Tennessee District 10 2 Steady 8 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady
Texas District 13 0 Decrease 1 13 Increase 1 0 Steady 0 Steady
Utah At-large 1 1 Increase 1 0 Decrease 1 0 Steady 0 Steady
Vermont[Note 5] District 2 2 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady
Virginia District 10 0 Steady 10 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady
Washington At-large 2 2 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady
West Virginia District 4 4 Increase 1 0 Decrease 1 0 Steady 0 Steady
Wisconsin District 10 10 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady
Wyoming At-large 1 1 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady
Total 357 200
56.0%
Increase 13 151
42.3%
Decrease 10 5
1.4%
Decrease 1 1[Note 3]
0.3%
Decrease 2
House seats
Republican
 β€‰
56.02%
Democratic
 β€‰
42.30%
Populist
 β€‰
1.40%
Silver Republican
 β€‰
0.28%

The previous election of 1898 saw the election of 6 Populists, 2 Silver Republicans, and a Silver Party member.

House seats by party holding plurality in state
  80+ to 100% Democratic
  80+ to 100% Populist
  80+ to 100% Republican
  60+ to 80% Democratic
 
  60+ to 80% Republican
  Up to 60% Democratic
  Up to 60% Populist
  Up to 60% Republican
Net gain in party representation
  6+ Democratic gain
 
  6+ Republican gain
  3-5 Democratic gain
 
  3-5 Republican gain
  1-2 Democratic gain
  1-2 Populist gain
  1-2 Republican gain
  no net change

Early election dates

In 1900, three states, with 8 seats among them, held elections early:

Complete returns

Party abbreviations

California

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

District Incumbent Party First
elected
Result Candidates
California 1 John All Barham Republican 1894 Retired
Republican hold
Frank Coombs (R) 55.3%
James F. Farraher (D) 42.4%
William Morgan (Soc) 1.6%
Charles T. Clark (P) 0.8%
California 2 Previous incumbent Marion De Vries (D) resigned
August 20, 1900 to accept a judicial position
Republican gain Samuel D. Woods[Note 8] (R) 50.4%
J. D. Sproul (D) 47.9%
W. F. Lockwood (Soc) 0.9%
W. H. Barron (P) 0.8%
California 3 Victor H. Metcalf Republican 1898 Re-elected Victor H. Metcalf (R) 58.3%
Frank Freeman (D) 38%
R. A. Dague (Soc) 2.6%
Alvin W. Holt (P) 1.1%
California 4 Julius Kahn Republican 1898 Re-elected Julius Kahn (R) 55.7%
R. Porter Ashe (D) 38.2%
Charles C. O'Donnell (I) 3.6%
G. B. Benham (Soc) 2.2%
Joseph Rowell (P) 0.3%
California 5 Eugene F. Loud Republican 1890 Re-elected Eugene F. Loud (R) 55.7%
J. H. Henry (D) 41.3%
C. H. King Sr. (Soc) 2.2%
Fred E. Caton (P) 0.8%
California 6 Russell J. Waters Republican 1898 Retired
Republican hold
James McLachlan (R) 52.4%
W. D. Crichton (D) 42.4%
Noble A. Richardson (Soc) 3.1%
A. H. Hensley (P) 2.1%
California 7 James C. Needham Republican 1898 Re-elected James C. Needham (R) 51.8%
William Graves (D) 37.9%
H. G. Wilshire (Soc) 7%
James Campbell (P) 3.2%

Florida

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

District Incumbent Party First
elected
Result Candidates
Florida 1 Stephen M. Sparkman Democratic 1894 Re-elected Stephen M. Sparkman (D) 87.0%
G. Brown Patterson (R) 13.0%
Florida 2 Robert Wyche Davis Democratic 1896 Re-elected Robert Wyche Davis (D) 80.0%
John M. Cheney (R) 20.0%

Nevada

District Incumbent Party First
elected
Result Candidates
Nevada at-large Francis G. Newlands Democratic 1892 Re-elected
as Democratic
Francis G. Newlands (D/Sil) 58.8%
E. S. Farrington (R) 41.2%

South Carolina

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

District Incumbent Party First
elected
Result Candidates
South Carolina 1 William Elliott Democratic 1886
1896
Re-elected William Elliott (D) 72.7%
W. W. Beckett (R) 27.3%
South Carolina 2 W. Jasper Talbert Democratic 1892 Re-elected W. Jasper Talbert (D) 97.7%
J. B. Odom (R) 2.3%
South Carolina 3 Asbury Latimer Democratic 1892 Re-elected Asbury Latimer (D) 97.5%
Anson C. Merrick (R) 2.5%
South Carolina 4 Stanyarne Wilson Democratic 1894 Lost primary
Democratic hold
Joseph T. Johnson (D) 97.0%
S. T. Poinier (R) 3.0%
South Carolina 5 David E. Finley Democratic 1898 Re-elected David E. Finley (D) 97.3%
John F. Jones (R) 2.7%
South Carolina 6 James Norton Democratic 1897 (special) Lost primary
Democratic hold
Robert B. Scarborough (D) 94.3%
R. A. Stuart (R) 5.7%
South Carolina 7 J. William Stokes Democratic 1894 Re-elected J. William Stokes (D) 93.2%
Alexander D. Dantzler (R) 6.8%

J. William Stokes (D) of the 7th district died in office on July 6, 1901 and was replaced in a special election by Asbury F. Lever (D)

See also

Notes

<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />

Cite error: Invalid <references> tag; parameter "group" is allowed only.

Use <references />, or <references group="..." />

References

<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />

Cite error: Invalid <references> tag; parameter "group" is allowed only.

Use <references />, or <references group="..." />

Bibliography

  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links


Cite error: <ref> tags exist for a group named "Note", but no corresponding <references group="Note"/> tag was found, or a closing </ref> is missing

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Martis, pp. 154–155.