Regency of Algiers

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
(Redirected from Ottoman Algeria)
Jump to: navigation, search

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Regency of Algiers
دولة الجزائر  (Arabic)
ایالت جزایر غرب‎‎  (Ottoman Turkish)
Autonomous eyalet (Client state) of the Ottoman Empire[1][2]
De facto independent since mid-17th century[3][4][5]
1516–1830
Left: One type of Algerian Regency flag
Right: Flag of the Ottoman regent of Algiers[nb 1]
Motto
دار الجهاد
Overall extent of the Regency of Algiers, late 17th to early 19th centuries[8]
Capital Algiers
Languages Algerian Arabic
Berber
Sabir (used in trade)
Religion Official, and majority:
Sunni Islam (Maliki and Hanafi)
Minorities:
Ibadi Islam
Shia Islam
Judaism
Christianity
Demonym Algerian or
Algerine (obs.)
Government Stratocratic Regency
1516–1519: Sultanate
1519–1659: Pashalik
1659[9] (de facto in 1626)[10]–1830: Military republic
Rulers
 •  1516–1518 Aruj Barbarossa
 •  1710–1718 Baba Ali Chaouch
 •  1766-1791 Baba Mohammed ben-Osman
 •  1818–1830 Hussein Dey
Historical era Early modern period
 •  Spanish conquest of Oran 1509
 •  Capture of Algiers 1516
 •  Ottoman–Habsburg wars 1521–1791
 •  Algiers expedition 1541
 •  Algerian-Sherifian conflicts 1550–1795
 •  Golden Age of the Barbary slave trade 1580–1640
 •  Turkish abductions 1627
 •  Janissary Revolution 1659
 •  Invasion of Algiers 1830
Population
 •  1830 est. 3,000,000–5,000,000 
Currency Major coins:
mahboub (sultani)
budju
aspre
Minor coins:
saïme
pataque-chique
Preceded by
Succeeded by
Hafsids of Béjaïa
Kingdom of Tlemcen
French Algeria
Beylik of Titteri
Beylik of Constantine
Western Beylik
Emirate of Abdelkader
Igawawen
Kingdom of Beni Abbas
Sultanate of Tuggurt
Awlad Sidi Shaykh
Kingdom of Kuku
Today part of Algeria
Warning: Value not specified for "continent"

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

The Regency of Algiers[lower-alpha 1][lower-alpha 2] was an early modern semi-independent Ottoman province and tributary state on the Barbary Coast of North Africa from 1516 to 1830.[lower-alpha 3] Founded by the privateer brothers Aruj and Hayreddin Reis (also known as the Barbarossa brothers), the Regency succeeded the Kingdom of Tlemcen as an infamous and formidable pirate base that plundered and waged maritime holy war on European Christian powers. Ottoman regents ruled as heads of a stratocracy—an autonomous military government controlled by the janissary corps—known as Garp ocakları (lit. Western Garrison) in Ottoman terminology.

The Regency emerged in the 16th-century Ottoman–Habsburg wars as a unique corsair state that drew revenue and political power from its maritime strength. In the 17th century, when the wars between the Spanish Habsburgs and the Ottoman Empire, Kingdom of France, Kingdom of England and Dutch Republic ended, Barbary corsairs started capturing merchant ships and their crews and goods from these states. When the Ottomans could not prevent these attacks, European powers negotiated directly with Algiers and also took military action against it. This emancipated Algiers diplomatically and increased its autonomy.

The Regency held significant naval power in the 16th and 17th centuries and well into the end of the Napoleonic wars despite European naval superiority. Its institutionalised privateering dealt substantial damage to European shipping, took captives for ransom, plundered booty, hijacked ships and eventually demanded regular tribute payments. In the rich and bustling city of Algiers, the Barbary slave trade reached an apex. After the janissary coup of 1659, the Regency became a sovereign military republic,[lower-alpha 4] and its rulers were thenceforth elected by the council known as the diwan rather than appointed by the Ottoman sultan previously.

Despite wars over territory with Spain and the Maghrebi states in the 18th century, Mediterranean trade and diplomatic relations with European states expanded. Bureaucratisation efforts stabilized the Regency's government, allowing into office regents such as Mohammed ben-Osman, who maintained Algerian prestige thanks to his public and defensive works which increased revenue and fended off attacks on Algiers. British tribute payments no longer insured U.S. shipping traffic in the Mediterranean after the American Revolution, and the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic wars provided an opportunity for frequent Algerian privateering. Increased demands for tribute from Algiers started the Barbary Wars at the beginning of the 19th century, when Algiers was decisively defeated for the first time. Internal central authority weakened in Algiers due to political intrigue, failed harvests and the decline of privateering. Violent tribal revolts followed, mainly led by maraboutic orders such as the Darqawis and Tijanis. In 1830, France took advantage of this domestic turmoil to invade. The resulting French conquest of Algeria led to colonial rule until 1962.

History

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Establishment

Encouraged by the political disintegration of the Maghrebi Muslim states[14] and fearing an alliance between the Moriscos (exiled Spanish Muslims) and the Egyptian Mamluk Sultanate,[15] the Spanish Empire captured several cities and established walled and garrisoned strongpoints called presidios in North Africa.[16] The Spanish conquered the city of Oran in 1509 and took it from the Zayyanids, as well as Béjaïa from the Hafsids; then Tripoli from the Hafsids in 1510, making other coastal cities submit to them such as Algiers, where they built an island fortress known as the Peñón of Algiers.[17] In addition to territorial ambitions and Catholic missionary fervor,[15] Spanish economical aims included control over the caravan trade routes from western Sudan, Tripoli and Tunis in the east and Ceuta to Melilla in the west, passing through Béjaïa, Algiers, Oran and Tlemcen; the gold and slave trades funded the Spanish treasury.[18]

Hayreddin and Aruj brothers

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

After operating as Hafsid-sponsored privateers from their base in the island of Djerba,[19] Mytilenean-born brothers Aruj and Hayreddin Reis, nicknamed the Barbarossa brothers, came to North Africa at the request of the citizens of Béjaïa in 1512. They failed to take the city from the Spanish twice,[19] but the citizens of Jijel offered to make Aruj king after his corsairs arrived with a shipload of wheat during a famine.[20] Answering pleas for help from its inhabitants, the brothers captured Algiers in 1516 but failed to destroy the Peñón.[21][22] Aruj executed the Algerian emir, Salim Al-Tumi,[23] then proclaimed himself Sultan of Algiers.[24][25] He also repelled an attack led by the Spanish commander Don Diego de Vera,[26][27] which won him the allegiance of people in the northern part of central Algeria.[28]

In the central Maghreb, Aruj built a powerful Muslim state officially named the Kingdom of Algiers[29] at the expense of its quarreling principalities.[30] He sought the support of the maraboutic and Sufi orders,[31][32] while his absolute authority was backed by Turks and Christian renegade corsairs.[33] "Aruj [Reis] effectively began the powerful greatness of Algiers and the Barbary", wrote Diego de Haedo (fr; es; it), a Spanish Benedictine held captive in Algiers between 1577 and 1580.[30] Aruj continued his conquests in western Algeria, reaching Tlemcen,[32] but a Spanish–Zayyanid coalition cut his supply route from Algiers. Aruj was killed with his companions in 1518 when he attempted to break out during the Fall of Tlemcen.[34][35]

Hayreddin inherited his brother's position as sultan without opposition,[30][36] although he faced threats from the Spanish, Zayyanids, Hafsids and neighboring tribes.[34] After repelling another Spanish attack in August 1519, led by Hugo of Moncada,[37][38] Hayreddin pledged allegiance to the Sublime Porte to obtain Ottoman support against his foes.[39] In October 1519, a delegation of Algerian dignitaries and ulama went to Ottoman sultan Selim I, proposing that Algiers join the Ottoman Empire.[40][41] Constantinople had doubts,[36] but the sultan recognized Hayreddin as pasha[39]—a regent with the title of beylerbey (lit. Prince of princes)[42][30]—and sent him 2,000 janissaries.[36] Algiers officially became an eyalet (called a "regency" in European sources;[43] some historians refer to it as an Ottoman vassal state,[44] state-province[45][46] or "Imperial state"[47][48]) under Selim's successor Suleiman I in the spring of 1521.[49] Historian Lamnouar Merouche stresses that although Algiers was an increasingly autonomous province within the Ottoman Empire, it had at the same time all the attributes of a state.[50]

Hayreddin had to return to Jijel after a coalition of the Hafsids with the Kabyle kingdom of Kuku blockaded Algiers.[51] He and his men used their reputation as "holy warriors" to gather support from the Kabyle tribes of Beni Abbas, who were rivals of the Kuku.[51] Hayreddin retook Algiers in 1525 after defeating the prince and founder of Kuku, Ahmad ibn al-Kadi,[52][53] and then destroyed the Peñón of Algiers in 1529.[54] Hayreddin used its rubble to build Algiers's harbour,[55] making it the headquarters of the Algerian corsair fleet.[56] Hayreddin established the military structure of the Regency,[57] formalising an institution known as the Corsairs of Algiers. It would become the model for Barbary corsairs in Tunis, Tripoli and the Republic of Salé in the 17th century.[58] He conducted several raids on Spanish coasts[59] and vanquished the Genoese fleet of Andrea Doria at Cherchell.[60] Hayreddin also rescued over 70,000 Andalusian refugees from the Spanish inquisition and brought them to Algeria,[61][59] where they contributed to the flourishing culture of the Regency.[62]

The Barbarossa brothers turned Algiers into an Islamic bastion against Catholic Spain in the western Mediterranean,[63][64] making it the capital of what would become the early modern Algerian state.[65][64] The sultan called Hayreddin to the Porte to appoint him as Kapudan Pasha (admiral) in 1533. Before departing, Hayreddin named Hasan Agha his deputy in Algiers.[66]

Aruj Reis, Sultan of Algiers, 1590s. University of Heidelberg Library.
Birds-eye view of Algiers, 1575 Georg Braun and Frans Hogenberg. University of Heidelberg library.
Hayreddin Reis, first beylerbey of Algiers.University of Heidelberg library.

Hayreddin's successors

Noord-Afrikaanse galeien 1684. North African galleys. Jan Luyken, Rijksmuseum

From 1519 onwards Algerian affairs were in the hands of beylerbeys—[67]corsair captains appointed by the Ottoman sultan to rule.[68] Assisted by a council of government, they took care to respect local institutions and customs under their dominion.[47] The beylerbeys were usually strongmen who kept most of the Maghreb firmly under Ottoman control, garrisoning the main towns with troops and collecting taxes on land while relying heavily on privateering at sea.[69] Because of their experience in fleet command, some beylerbeys became Kapudan Pasha[56] and led the Ottoman expansion in the Mediterranean.[70]

For most of the 16th century, the beylerbeys acted as independent sovereigns despite acknowledging the suzerainty of the Ottoman sultan,[71][68] who gave them a free hand but expected Algerian ships to help enforce Ottoman foreign policy if required.[72] However, the interests of Algiers and Constantinople eventually diverged on the matter of privateering, over which the Sublime Porte had no control.[73] Beylerbeys often remained in power for several years and exercised authority over Tunis and Tripoli as well.[74][75] In addition, the timar system that granted fertile land to Ottoman sipahis was not applied in Algiers; instead, the beylerbeys sent tribute to Constantinople every year after paying off the expenses of the Regency.[1]

Algerian expansion

The foreign policy of Algiers aligned completely with the Ottoman Empire.[76] Under Hasan Agha, Algiers repelled a naval attack from the Holy Roman Empire led by Emperor Charles V in October 1541.[77][78] The victory over the Spaniards was seen as a divine mandate of the Ottoman rule.[79] Hasan Agha subjugated Kuku in the east in 1542,[80] extended his rule south to Biskra and gained Tlemcen's support in the west.[81][82] The Spanish defeat made Algiers the center of piracy, attracting pirates from all over the Mediterranean. The city became a bazaar for thousands of captured Christian slaves.[83] Algiers was known in Christian Europe as "the scourge of Christendom" and a 16th-century "rogue state".[84]

File:1559 Ottoman Empire (cropped).jpg
Beylerbeylik of Algiers within the Ottoman Empire (in red) during the Ottoman-Habsburg wars in 1559, Historical atlas of the world and the Ottoman Empire. Eser Mehmed Esref (1913).

Hayreddin's son Hasan Pasha succeeded Hasan Agha. He led campaigns against Spanish ally Saadian Morocco,[85] decisively defeating it in Tlemcen in 1551.[86][87] He was recalled by the sultan after the French ambassador in Constantinople supported his successor Salah Rais,[88] who would expand his rule to Berber Beni Djallab's principalities in Touggourt and Ouargla,[86] making them tributaries.[89] Hasan Pasha then advanced as far as Fez in January 1554, placing Wattasid pretender Abu Hassun as an Ottoman vassal there.[87][90] Salah Rais captured Spanish-held Béjaïa in 1555,[91] and his death ignited tensions between the janissaries and the corsairs in 1556. The janissaries supported Hasan Corso, a Corsican renegade,[92] who refused to submit to the pasha sent from Constantinople.[93][94] Although the pasha murdered Hasan Corso with the corsairs' support, the janissaries killed the pasha in retribution.[95] The subsequent instability prompted Suleiman the Magnificent to restore order by sending Hasan Pasha back to Algiers,[93] who thwarted the expedition to Mostaganem of the Spanish governor of Oran Count Alcaudete's in 1558.[96]

Beylerbey Uluç Ali Pasha,[97] who captured Tunis from Hafsid vassals of Spain in 1569[98] before losing it to the Christian forces under Spanish commander John of Austria in 1573, leaving 8,000 men in the Spanish presidio of La Goletta;[99] Uluç Ali recaptured the city in 1574,[100] while his ships saved the Ottoman fleet from total defeat in the battle of Lepanto in 1571.[101]

Uluç Ali's deputy Caïd Ramdan (fr) captured Fez in 1576 after defeating Saadian ruler Mohammed II and put Abd al-Malik on the throne as an Ottoman vassal.[102][103] In 1578 his successor Hassan Veneziano led his troops deep into the Sahara to the oases of Tuat in central Algeria to respond to pleas from its inhabitants for help against Saadi-allied tribes from Tafilalt.[104][105] A campaign against Morocco led by Uluç Ali was aborted in 1581,[106] as Saadian ruler Al-Mansur had at first vehemently refused to serve under Ottoman sultan Murad III, but agreed to pay annual tribute afterwards.[107] Nonetheless, the Figuig oases in the south western Maghreb were part of the Regency by 1584.[108] Veneziano's privateers ravaged the Mediterranean and made the waters unsafe from Andalusia to Sicily.[109] Their power reached as far as the Canary Islands.[106]

17th century: Golden age

Pashalik period (1587–1659)

File:Den nieuwen bassa onder kooningh van Algiers afgesonden vanden grooten heer, objectnr A 41721.tif
The arrival of the new pasha, Viceroy of Algiers, sent by the great lord (Ottoman Sultan) Jan Luyken (1684). Amsterdam Museum.

Fearful of the growing authority of the beylerbeylik, the Sublime Porte replaced it with pashas who served a three-year term starting in 1587.[110] The Ottomans also divided the Maghreb into the three regencies of Algiers, Tunis and Tripoli.[111] Earlier pashas such as Khider Pasha (fr) and Kose Mustafa Pasha served for multiple terms and guaranteed stability in the Regency. From the mid-17th century, pashas were isolated and deprived of local support,[112] as they were constantly torn between the corsairs' and janissaries' demands.[73] The corsair captains were effectively outside the pashas' control, and the janissaries' loyalty to them depended on their ability to collect taxes and meet payroll.[113] Both groups sometimes refused orders from the sultan, or even sent the pashas appointed by the sultan back to Constantinople.[73]

Janissary insubordination

Algiers was the headquarters of probably the largest janissary force in the empire outside Constantinople.[114] After Veneziano, the janissary corps grew stronger and more influential, challenging the corsairs for power.[68][69] In 1596, Khider Pasha led a revolt in Algiers in an effort to subdue the janissaries with help from Kabyles and coulouglis—offspring of mixed marriage between Ottoman men and local women and having blood ties to the great indigenous families.[115] Although the revolt spread to neighboring towns, it ultimately failed.[116][117] The coulouglis failed to start another coup against the janissaries,[118] which won the janissaries sole power in Algiers.[115]

In the 16th century, France signed capitulation treaties with the Ottomans that established the Franco–Ottoman Alliance and gave the French trading privileges in Algiers.[119] The French built a trading center known as the Bastion de France,[120] which exported coral legally under its monopoly and wheat illegally. The bastion was fortified and turned into a military supply base and a center of espionage, which Algerians were displeased by.[121] Khider Pasha destroyed the bastion in 1604.[122] The Ottoman Porte had him assassinated and replaced by the more compliant Mohammed Koucha (fr) Pasha,[123] but the janissaries revolted in 1606 and tortured him to death.[124] Algiers and Constantinople had different views of relations with France.[125] The janissaries organised into the diwan (military council), the effective government of Algiers by 1626 at the expense of the pashas, who began official acts with the phrase, "We, pasha and diwân of the invincible militia of Algiers".[126][127] According to priest and historian Pierre Dan (fr) (1580–1649), "The state has only the name of a kingdom since, in effect, they have made it into a republic."[128]

Corsair autonomy

After the battle of Lapento, the corsairs broke loose from the Sublime Porte and began to prey on ships from countries at peace with the Ottomans.[129][130] Their tai'fa was the embodiment of state sponsored piracy, since the economical prosperity of Algiers depended on the corsairs' looting.[131] Algiers started strengthening and modernizing its fleet; by the end of the 16th century, janissaries were allowed to join corsair ships.[132] As the 17th century started, the corsairs adopted square-rigged sails and tapered hulls. Their ships became faster and less dependent on a steady supply of galley slaves.[133][134] Many of the Moriscos expelled from Spain joined the corsairs, and they debilitated Spain, ravaging its mainland and its territories in Italy, where they captured people en masse.[129][135] European converts to Islam, known in Europe as "renegades" and "turned Turks", made up a majority on the tai'fa, amongst whom were former slaves who rose to positions of power.[136] Renegade captain Ali Bitchin became admiral of the Algerian navy in 1621[137] and raided Spanish harbors.[138] After the Ottoman sultan refused to compensate Algiers for its losses against the Venetians in Valona,[139] Ali Bitchin refused to answer a summons from the sultan to join the Cretan war in 1645, then died quite suddenly.[140][141]

The 17th century was a "golden age" for the North African corsairs. Algerian autonomy and rivalry between Christian states made the prestige and wealth of the corsairs reach its zenith[142][143] as their intensified privateering significantly filled Algerian coffers.[144][110] In their search for booty and slaves, corsairs traveled as far as Iceland in 1627 and Ireland in 1631.[145][146] Historian Yahya Boaziz indicates that more than a thousand European ships were captured from 1608 to 1634, with more than 25,000 people enslaved, many of whom were Dutch, German, French, Spanish and English, making the value of the total spoils rise to about 4,752,000 pounds. Pierre Dan estimated the value of seized cargo at around 20,000,000 francs.[147] Algiers became a thriving market in the 17th century for captives and plundered goods from all over the Mediterranean[129] as a wealthy city with over 100,000 inhabitants.[3] The reliance on piracy and captivity served to keep Algiers financially and politically independent from Constantinople.[148]

Military republic (1659–1710)

Agha regime in 1659

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Janissary of the Odjak of Algiers. Nicholas Bonnart (fr). Gallica.
Map with 3-D representation of the topographic features of Algiers
City, port and breakwater of Algiers, c.1690. Gerard van Keulen (nl). Nederlands Scheepvaartmuseum

The pashas sent by the Sublime Porte worked to multiply their wealth as quickly as possible before the end of their three-year term in office. As governance became a secondary issue, the pashas lost all influence and respect,[149] and aversion to the Sublime Porte increased.[150] In 1659, Ibrahim Pasha pocketed some of the money the Ottoman sultan had sent to the corsairs as compensation for their losses in the Cretan War, which ignited a massive revolt,[151] and the rebellious corsairs arrested and imprisoned him.[152] Khalil Agha, commander-in-chief of the janissaries of Algiers, took advantage of the incident and seized power,[153][154] accusing the pashas sent by the Sublime Porte of corruption and hindering the Regency's affairs with European countries.[131] The janissaries effectively eliminated the authority of the pasha, whose position became purely ceremonial.[115] They assigned executive authority to Khalil Agha, provided that his rule would not exceed two months, and put legislative power in the hands of the diwan council. The sultan, forced to accept the new government, stipulated that the diwan pay the janissaries stationed there.[155] Khalil Agha began his rule by building the Djamaa el Djedid mosque.[155] The era of the aghas began[154] and the pashalik became a military republic.[156][157][158] However, the aghas who ruled Algiers since 1659 were all assassinated,[66] which resulted in weakened authority.[116]

Deylik period in 1671

In 1671 Sir Edward Spragge's English squadron destroyed seven ships anchored in the harbor at Algiers, and the corsairs killed Agha Ali,[159] who was an autocrat sovereign that alienated the diwan, and whose conciliation policy with European states at the expense of privateering angered the corsairs.[160] Janissary leaders wanted to appoint another agha of a sovereign Algiers, but given the lack of candidates, they and the corsairs resorted to a method Ali Bitchin Rais had used in 1644–45: they entrusted both the Regency and the responsibility for its payroll to an old Dutch rais named Hadj Mohammed Trik[161][162] and gave him the titles of dey (maternal uncle), doulateli (head of state) and hakem (military ruler).[163]

After 1671, the deys led the country,[164] supported by members of the diwan of which the president seconded the dey and managed most of state affairs.[165] This centralized government institutionalized relations between the janissaries, effective holders of both military and political power, and the corsairs as the Regency's economic powerhouse that would remunerate the janissaries through the deys.[166][4] This made Algiers de facto independent of the Ottoman Empire.[4] But the deys' power was checked by the diwan,[167] and both janissaries and corsairs ousted deys they did not like.[168]

Foreign relations and privateering

Privateering operations were regulated by treaties with European powers.[130] Algiers used privateering as a foreign policy tool to play its European counterparts against one other[169][170][lower-alpha 5] and hunt merchant ships, prompting European states to sign peace treaties and seek Mediterranean passes to help them secure lucrative cabotage trade.[171][172] This gave the Regency's elites internal legitimacy as champions of jihad,[173] and according to early modern European authors, international respect for the Regency's sovereignty as an established government, despite still being a "nest of pirates".[174] Dutch jurist Hugo Grotius (1583–1645) noted that "Algiers exercised the jus ad bellum of a sovereign power through its corsairs".[175] Historian Daniel Panzac stressed:[176] <templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

Indeed, privateering was based on two fundamental priniciples: it was one of the forms of war practiced by the Maghreb against the Christian states, which conferred upon it a dimension that was at one and the same time legitimate and religious; and it was exercised in a framework defined by a state strong enough to enact its rules and control their application.

Europe

Peace between the Ottoman Empire and Spanish Habsburgs in 1580 did not concern their vassals, as both the Sovereign Order of Malta and the North African Regencies pursued their holy war. Their privateers were motivated by desires of vengeance, wealth and salvation.[177] England, France and the Dutch Republic were seen as allies by the Ottoman regencies until the end of the 16th century because of their common Spanish enemy,[178] but when James I of England and Dutch States-General opted for peace with Spain in 1604 and 1609, respectively, and increased their shipping in the Mediterranean,[179] Algerian and Tunisian corsairs attacked their ships. They amassed wealth from capturing slaves and goods while taking advantage of their strong fleet, maritime European weakness and Ottoman incapacity to force the regencies to respect the Ottoman capitulations.[180] Algiers's refusal to follow Ottoman foreign policy led European powers to negotiate treaties with it directly on trade, tribute and slave ransoms,[181] recognizing Algerian autonomy despite its formal subordination to the Ottomans.[182]

France first established relations with Algiers in 1617,[183] with a treaty signed in 1619[184] and another in 1628;[185][121] the treaties mostly concerned the Bastion de France and the rights of French merchants in Algiers,[186][187] but the bastion was razed a second time by Ali Bitchin in 1637,[188] as armed incidents between French and Algerian vessels were frequent. Nonetheless, a treaty in 1640 allowed France to regain its North African commercial establishments.[188][189]

After attacks by the English in 1621[190] and the Dutch in 1624, Algerian corsairs took thousands of English[191] and Dutch sailors to the Algerian slave market,[192] resulting in intermittent wars followed by longlasting peace treaties whose tribute payments terms ranged from money to weapons.[192][193][194] Under Louis XIV, France built a strong navy to fend off the corsairs who raided Corsica and were everywhere in the waters off Marseilles in the late 1650s.[125] The country launched multiple campaigns against the Regency, first in Jijel and Collo in 1664,[195] then several bombings of Algiers were conducted between 1682 and 1688 in what is known as the Franco–Algerian war,[169] which ended when a 100-year peace treaty was signed between Dey Hussein Mezzo Morto and Louis XIV.[196]

Maghreb

North West Africa. Guillaume Delisle, 1707. Library of Congress.

Algiers entered a period of peaceful relations with Europe.[197] The resulting decline in privateering forced Algiers to seek other sources of revenue. Dey Hadj Chabane set his sights on his Maghrebi neighbors, Tunis and Morocco.[42] For historical reasons, Algiers considered Tunisia a dependency because Algiers had annexed it to the Ottoman Empire,[198] which made the appointment of its pashas a prerogative of the Algerian beylerbeys.[199] Faced with Tunisian opposition to Algerian hegemony and its ambitions in the Constantine region,[200] the Algerian dey took the opportunity provided by the 20 years of civil war between Murad II Bey's sons to invade in 1694 and put a puppet bey on the throne.[201][202] A vengeful Murad III Bey of Tunis allied with Morocco and started the Maghrebi war in 1700.[198] He lost, and the Muradid dynasty was replaced by the Husainid dynasty,[198] which failed to free Tunis from Algerian suzerainty in 1735[203] and 1756.[204] Tunis remained an Algerian tributary until the early 19th century.[205]

The Alawi Sultanate opposed the Ottomans.[200] It also had ancient ambitions to expand in western Algeria—especially in Tlemcen.[200] Algerian support for pretenders to the Moroccan throne[206] was answered with several invasions by Sultan Moulay Ismail in 1678,[207] 1692,[208] 1701[209] and 1707,[210] all of which failed.[211] Moulay Ismail was forced to accept the Moulouya River as his eastern border with Ottoman Algeria.[212]

18th century: Dey-Pashas of Algiers

File:Dey of Algiers Mohammed ben Hassan.jpg
Mohamed Ben Hassan Pasha-Dey giving audience to the King of France's envoy Mr Dusault in 1719. Ismaël Hamet, Histoire du Maghreb 1720. Gallica.

By the early 18th century, Algiers established a more stable form of government.[213] Janissary-elected deys obtained the right from the Ottoman sultan to be appointed as pashas, gaining more legitimacy.[214] The decline in privateering, fewer janissary recruits and decreased population and slaves[215] compelled the deys to expand and exploit the interior under their control,[216][217] impose tributes and further trade with European states and Tunis.[218]

Strengthened authority

Determined to remove the Spanish from Oran, Algerian dey Mohammed Bektach took the opportunity afforded by the War of the Spanish Succession to send Mustapha Bouchelaghem Bey at the head of a contingent of janissaries and local volunteers to take the city. He succeeded in 1707,[219] but in 1732 the Duke of Montemar's forces recaptured the city.[220]

The pashas plotted in secret, created conflicts and instigated sedition to overthrow the unpopular deys and regain some of their lost authority.[153] From 1710 the deys assumed the title of pasha at the initiative of Dey Baba Ali Chaouch and no longer accepted representatives from the Sublime Porte.[5] When the Austrian Habsburg monarchy signed the Peace of Passarowitz with the Ottoman Empire in 1718, Dey Ali Chaouch had Austrian ships captured despite the treaty and refused to pay compensation when an Ottoman-Austrian delegation approached him.[221] The deys also imposed their authority on the janissaries and the raïs.[66] The latter did not approve of treaty provisions which restricted privateering, their main source of income, and remained attached to the external prestige of the Regency.[222] But European reactions, new treaties guaranteeing the safety of navigation and a slowdown in shipbuilding considerably reduced their activity. The raïs rebelled and killed Dey Mohamed Ben Hassan in 1724.[223]

The new dey, Baba Abdi Pasha, quickly restored order and severely punished the conspirators.[224] He stabilised the Regency and fought corruption. The diwan was gradually weakened in favor of the dey's cabinet, known as "powers", resulting in more stability through the implementation of a quasi-bureaucracy.[225][226] Relations with Constantinople became formalised; the sultan was assured of Algerian "obedience" in return for recruiting troops from Ottoman lands, yet the dey was not bound to Ottoman foreign policy.[227]

On 3 February 1748 Dey Mohamed Ibn Bekir issued The Fundamental Pact of 1748, a text that defined the rights of the subjects of Algiers and of all inhabitants of the Regency of Algiers. It codified the behavior of the different army units: janissaries, gunners, chaouchs and sipahis.[228][229] In the three beyliks (provinces), the beys relied on local notables since they had a limited number of janissaries. This allowed the coulouglis to become beys.[230]

Mohammed ben-Osman's rule

Baba Mohammed ben-Osman became dey in 1766 and ruled over a prosperous Algiers for 25 years until he died in 1791.[120][231] He built fortifications, fountains and a municipal water supply;[232] he also strengthened the navy,[233] kept the janissaries in check and developed trade.[231] Algerian historian Nasreddin Saidouni reports that the dey placed in the state treasury 200,000 Algerian sequins that he had saved from his private salary, which he did not reclaim, during the Spanish attacks on Algiers.[234] His governor of Constantine, Salah Bey, managed to re-assert Regency authority as far south as Touggourt.[235] Algiers also maintained its military superiority over its neighbors under his rule.[236]

The dey increased the annual tribute paid by several European states[231][183] such as Britain, Sweden, the Italian states and Denmark, which sent a naval campaign against Algiers under Frederik Kaas in 1770; the campaign failed, and Denmark was forced to pay heavy war compensations and send gifts to Algiers.[237][238]

In 1775 Irish-born admiral of the Spanish Empire Alejandro O'Reilly led an expedition to subdue pirate activity in the Mediterranean. The assault's disastrous failure dealt a humiliating blow to the reorganized Spanish military.[239] This was followed by two bombardments by Antonio Barceló in 1783[240] and 1784, also ending in defeat.[241] Led by Mohammed Kebir Bey in 1791,[242] Algiers launched a final assault on Oran, which was retaken after negotiations between Dey Hasan III Pasha with the Spanish Count of Floridablanca. The assault marked the end of almost 300 years of holy war between Algeria and Spain.[243][215]

The Treaty of 1791 ended almost 300 years of war. Archives, Spanish Ministry of Culture.
Fort and chapel of Santa Cruz, Oran

19th century: Fall of the Regency

Internal crisis

At the beginning of the 19th century, Algiers was plagued by political unrest and economic problems.[244] A series of crises rocked Algiers in the early 19th century, beginning with famine from 1803 to 1805.[244] Algerian reliance on Jewish merchants to trade with Europe was so great[245][lower-alpha 6] that a crisis caused by crop failure led to the assassination of Dey Mustapha Pasha (fr) and the death of Jewish merchant Naphtali Busnash. Public unrest, a pogrom and successive coups followed, beginning a 20-year period of instability.[244] The Alawi Sultanate incited a massive Sufi Darqawiyya revolt in the east and west of the regency,[246][247] which was quelled with difficulty by the governor of Oran, Osman Bey.[248] Meanwhile, payment delays caused frequent janissary revolts, leading to military setbacks[249] as Morocco took possession of Figuig in 1805, Tuat and Oujda in 1808,[250][251][252] and Tunisia freed itself from Algerian suzerainty after the wars of 1807 and 1813.[253]

Barbary Wars

Reduction of Algiers (1816), Thomas Luny. Royal Museums Greenwich

Internal financial problems led Algiers to re-engage in widespread piracy against American and European shipping in the early 19th century, taking full advantage of the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars.[254] Algerian vessels attacked American merchant ships in 1785, claiming they were no longer under British protection and asserting an Algerian right to search and seizure.[255] American president George Washington agreed to pay a ransom and annual tribute equal to $10 million over 12 years in accordance to a peace treaty with Algiers in 1795.[254] However, Algiers was defeated in the Second Barbary War by the United States in 1815 when U.S. commodore Stephen Decatur's squadron killed Algerian admiral Raïs Hamidou in the battle off Cape Gata on 17 June 1815,[256] ending the Algerian threat to U.S. shipping in the Mediterranean.[256]

The new European order that emerged from the Coalition Wars and the Congress of Vienna did not tolerate Algerian raids and viewed them as a "barbaric relic of a previous age".[257] In August 1816 Lord Exmouth carried out a bombardment of Algiers that ended in a British and Dutch victory, a weakened Algerian navy and the liberation of 1,200 slaves.[258][259] Dey Ali Khodja, with support from the coulouglis and the Kabyles, disposed of the turbulent janissaries and transferred the seat of power and the treasury of the regency from the Djenina Palace to the Casbah citadel in 1817.[260]

The last deys of Algiers tried to nullify the consequences of the previous Algerian defeats by reviving buccaneering and resisting a British attack on Algiers in 1824,[261][262] creating the illusion that Algiers could still defend itself against a divided Europe.[263]

French invasion

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Ship attacking a walled city from its harbor
Admiral Dupperé attacking Algiers by sea, 3 July 1830, Antoine Léon Morel-Fatio (Palace of Versailles)

In Napoleon's time, Algiers benefited greatly from Mediterranean trade and France's massive food imports, much of which were bought on credit. In 1827, Hussein Dey demanded that the restored Kingdom of France pay off a 31-year-old debt dating from 1799 for providing supplies to the soldiers of Napoleon's campaign in Egypt.[264]

The response of French consul Pierre Deval displeased Hussein Dey, who hit him with a fly whisk and called him an "infidel".[264] King Charles X took this incident as an opportunity to break off diplomatic relations[264] and launch a full-scale invasion of Algeria on June 14, 1830. Algiers surrendered on July 5, and Hussein Dey went into exile in Naples, which marked the end of the Regency of Algiers.[265] Historian John Douglas Ruedy believes that the early 18th-century "deturkification" could have led to a 19th-century nationalization of the Algerian regime, but the French conquest put an end to this evolution.[266]

Administration

File:Djenina Palace (Algiers)~3.jpg
Djenina Palace, seat of the Regency of Algiers. L'Algérie photographiée: Province d'Alger (1856-1857). Gallica. Bibliothèque nationale de France.Félix-Jacques Moulin.

The administrative division of Ottoman Algeria organized itself through borrowed Ottoman systems, maintained by regular recruitment of military personnel from Ottoman lands in exchange for tribute sent to the Sublime Porte and local traditions inherited from the Almohad Caliphate that were adopted by the Marinids, Zayyanids, and Hafsids.[267]

Stratocracy

The corsairs waged holy war against the Christians through gunpowder and the resources of the Ottoman Empire and exploited their political and military superiority to defeat weak local emirates and impose a foreign elite on a divided Maghrebi society.[268] Power was in the hands of the Odjak,[269][32] a well-trained, resolute and democratically-spirited Anatolian Turkish janissary corps;[270][271] even though they reflected the Ottoman ruling class, they still referred to themselves as Algerians.[272][167] Natives and Kouloughlis were excluded from the Odjak, which was religiously endorsed and acted as a military order analogous to Hospitaller Rhodes.[32]

Some contemporary observers described the Regency of Algiers as a "despotic, military-aristocratic republic".[273][lower-alpha 7] Montesquieu considered the Algerian government to be an aristocracy with republican and egalitarian characteristics, elevating and deposing a despotic sovereign, while historian Edward Gibbon considered Algiers a "military government that floats between absolute monarchy and wild democracy".[274] It was unique among Muslim countries in having limited democracy and elected rulers. Democracy was extremely unusual in 18th-century Europe, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau found Algiers impressive in this respect.[275] Merouche described the janissary corps of Algiers as a "collective regime", a "sovereign community" and a "military republic".[276]

Moorish courtyard of the janissary barracks of Algiers

Unlike modern political democracies based on majority rule, transfers of power and competition between political parties, politics in Algiers relied on the principle of consensus (ijma), which is legitimized by Islam and jihad,[275] and centered on an Ottoman military elite separated from tribal and self-ruled indigenous society in the countryside, which still gave allegiance and paid taxes to a military authority that respected their marabouts[277] and defended them against Christian powers.[lower-alpha 8][278]

Algiers underwent numerous political developments with the transformation of the Ottoman Empire from strength and expansion to weakness and stagnation as a local government that accepted Ottoman legitimacy.[279] American historian John Baptist Wolf noted that this 17th century military democracy was later hampered by the absolute rule of the deys, starting from Baba Ali Chaouch in 1710.[280] The Marquis d'Argens compared 18th-century Algiers to the Roman Empire under Nero and Caligula and called it a republic, even though he also called the dey of Algiers a king.[274]

Dey of Algiers

Dey Omar Agha receiving the representative of Lord Exmouth after the bombardment of Algiers in 1816. Victoria and Albert Museum.
Hussein Pasha, last dey of Algiers (1818–1830). Royal Collection

French historian Charles-André Julien wrote that the dey of Algiers was head of an elective but absolute monarchy.[281] The dey was responsible for enforcing civil and military laws, ensuring internal security, generating necessary revenues, organizing and providing regular pay for soldiers and assuring relations with the tribes,[282] but his power was limited by privateer captains and the diwan of janissaries, since any member of either body could aspire to become dey.[67] His fortune came from his civil list (which did not exceed that of the highest paid member of the janissaries), and although he could still receive shares of privateer booty and gifts from consuls and beys, his fortune reverted to the public treasury in the event of assassination.[283][284] This led some authors who compared the dey to the king of Poland–Lithuania to call him a "despot without liberty",[281][285] a "king of slaves and slave of his subjects" and a "man of wealth but far from a master of his treasures".[286][287]

Electing the dey was accomplished in absolute equality by unanimous vote among the armed forces.[288] Ottoman Algerian dignitary Hamdan Khodja wrote:[289]

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

Among the members of the government two of them are called, one "wakil-el-kharge", and the other "khaznagy". It is from these dignitaries that the dey is chosen; sovereignty in Algiers is not hereditary: personal merit is not transmitted to children. In a way we could say that they adopted the principles of a republic, of which the dey is only the president.

Election was required for confirmation from the Ottoman sultan, who inevitably sent a firman of investiture, a red kaftan of honor, a saber of state and the rank of Pasha of Three Horsetails in the Ottoman army.[290] Because the dey was elected for life and could only be replaced on his death, overthrowing him was the only method, so violence and instability flourished. This volatility led many early 18th-century European observers to point to Algiers as an example of the inherent dangers of democracy.[275]

Cabinet

The dey appointed and relied on five ministers (plus an agha), who formed the "council of the powers" to govern Algiers:[291]

  • Khaznaji (fr): Treasurer in charge of finances and the public treasury.[292] Often also translated as vizier of the dey, or "principal secretary of state".
  • Agha al-mahalla (fr): Commander-in-chief of the Odjak and minister of internal affairs, he was also responsible for governing the Dar Es-Soltane (fr) region of Algiers.
  • Wakil al-Kharaj (fr) : Minister of the navy and foreign affairs,[292] he was the Kapudan rais or head of the tai'fa of rais. He was also responsible for matters relating to weapons, ammunition and fortifications.
  • Khodjet al-khil (fr): Responsible for relations with tribes, fiscal responsibilities and tax collections; he usually headed expeditions to the tribal interior. He also had the ceremonial role of "secretary of horses" and was assisted by a Khaznadar (treasurer).[293]
  • Bait al-Maldji: Responsible for the state domain (makhzen) and for rights devolved to the treasury such as vacant inheritances, registrations and confiscations.[293]

The dey also nominated muftis (Islamic jurists) as the highest echelon of Algerian justice. [294]

Diwan council

File:Houding van den Divan t´Algiers, objectnr A 41726.tif
Hasan Agha addresses audiences in a large square. Attitude of the Divan of Algiers, by Jan Luyken (1684). Amsterdam Museum

The diwan of Algiers was established in the 16th century by Hayreddin Reis. To manage state affairs and govern the country, he relied on carefully chosen janissary members of the diwan council.[295][296] This assembly, initially led by a janissary agha, evolved from an administrative body within the Odjak into a primary institution holding true power in Algiers.[297] By the middle of the 17th century, it elected the head of state.[67]

The diwan comprised two divisions:[151]

  • The private (janissary) diwan (diwân khass): Any recruit could rise through the ranks (one every three years). Over time, he would serve among 24 janissary bulukbasis (senior officers), who voted on high policy.[298] The commander-in-chief or "Agha of Two Moons" was elected for a term of two months as president of the diwan through a system of "democracy by seniority".[299] During the Agha period (1659–1671) he was the ruler of the Regency and held the title of hakem.[151] The agha was the holder of the Fundamental pact ('Ahad aman) of 1748,[300] which was often considered the constitutional basis of the Regency.[276] According to Hamdan Khodja:[301] <templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

    The head of this divan is called Aghat-el-Askar; he carries a saber and a kind of relic which contains the regulations of the regency (their charter); The agha must always carry this relic with him and never part without it.

  • The public, or Grand Diwan (diwân âm), was composed of 800 to 1,500 Hanafi scholars and preachers, the raïs, and native notables.[302] By the early-mid 17th century, the pasha, the agha of the janissaries and the admiral of the corsairs were heads of their respective factions in the Grand Diwan, holding decision-making power[303] and sharing sovereignty in Algiers.[304] However, starting from the Agha period, the Grand Diwan convened only to make wartime decisions and to resolve serious disputes within the government.[303] At the beginning of their mandate, the deys consulted the diwan on all important questions and decrees. This council in principle met weekly, depending on the dey, though by the 19th century, the dey could ignore the diwan whenever he felt powerful enough to govern alone.[305][306]

Territorial management

File:Ottoman Algeria.png
Ottoman Algeria

The Regency was composed of various beyliks under the authority of beys (vassals):[307]

These beyliks were institutionally distinct and enjoyed significant autonomy.[308]

Under the beylik system, the beys divided their beyliks into outan, or counties, governed by caïds (commanders) under the authority of the bey to maintain order and collect taxes.[88] The beys ran an administrative system and managed their beyliks with the help of commanders and governors among the makhzen tribes. In return, these tribes enjoyed special privileges, including exemption from taxes.[309]

The bey of Constantine relied on the strength of the local tribes, particularly the Beni Abbas in Medjana and the Arab tribes in Hodna and the M'zab region. The chiefs of these tribes were called Sheikh of the Arabs.[88] This system allowed Algiers to expand its authority over northern Algeria for three centuries.[310]

Economy

Slave ransoms

File:4 - Esclave français à Alger n39 Tome I Esquer.jpg
French slave in Algiers working as a tailor before his ransoming (1670–1685). This self-portrait done later in Paris. Leichtenstein Princely Collection.

Algerian corsairs captured many people on land and at sea from Mediterranean shores to Atlantic high seas[311] and brought them to the slave market in Algiers, through which passed between 25,000 and 36,000 slaves of many nationalities,[144][312] totaling over one million European slaves in the early modern period, making slavery the cornerstone of the Algerine economy.[313]

After captured individuals were paraded naked, examined and inspected to assess their qualities, social position and value,[314] they were divided into three groups:[315]

  • Those believed ransomable: Usually rich and better referred to as "captives", they were an important source of revenue. Their owners spared them the hardest tasks to preserve their value, as they were to be ransomed as quickly as possible.[316] "The captive was a piece of merchandise which it was to no one's interest to damage", noted Julien.[317]
  • Those not believed ransomable: Lower-class and priced like their Muslim counterparts in France,[318] these prisoners often became galley slaves or were assigned to other forced labor like moving rocks. A few were chosen as household domestic slaves.[311]
  • Those freed without ransom to be exchanged for Muslim captives, to honor prior agreements between states, or because a war had been lost.

Government-owned captives were held in prisons called "bagnos"; six operated in Algiers.[317] Privately owned captives were housed by their owners,[319] who were often rich individuals or privateering collectives.[320]

In Spain, France and the Dutch Republic,[316] ransom funds came from the captive's family, the state or religious orders of the Catholic church who negotiated in Algiers for the captives.[321] Catholic missions such as the Trinitarians and the Mercedarians[318] were instructed to identify captives in danger of apostasy, captives whose family and friends had raised money and valuable individuals before reaching a ransom agreement.[322] Captives who could buy their own freedom were allowed to move freely in Algiers, and often managed its taverns.[317]

Christians were exchanged for small sums in the early 16th century. However, in the 17th century redemptionist missions paid at least 100 pounds for their freedom. Persons of distinction were almost priceless: the governor of the Canary Islands bought himself back in 1670 for 60,000 pounds.[323]

After ransom was paid, additional fees for customs duties were still required, over 50 percent of the agreed ransom:[324]

  • 10% for customs
  • 15% for the pasha or dey
  • 4% for the khaznaji (secretary of state)
  • 7% for the wakil al-kharaj (harbourmaster)
  • 17% for prison guards

Slaves with special skills, such as surgeons and master carpenters who built or repaired ships, often could not be ransomed at any price.[325]

Armed and turbaned men beat prisoners as a priest ransoms them
Christian captives, 17th century. Le Commerce des Captifs. Wolfgang Kaiser
A plaza where chained people are displayed naked for sale
Slave market in Algiers, 17th century. Amsterdam Museum.

Royalties

Algiers charged its European trading partners royalties for freedom of navigation in the western Mediterranean and gave the merchants of those countries special privileges, including lower customs duties.[326][120] Royalties were also imposed on Bremen, Hanover and Prussia, in addition to the Papal States at times.[326] These royalties were paid annually or biennially and differed according to the relationship between those countries and Algiers, and the conditions prevailing in that period had an impact on determining their amounts, shown in the following table:[326]

Royalties: Late 18th century to early 19th century
Country Year Value Current value (USD)
Spanish Empire 1785–1807 After signing the armistice of 1785 and withdrawing from Oran, was required to pay 18,000 francs. It paid 48,000 dollars in 1807. *Error when using {{Inflation}}: |index=FR (parameter 1) not a recognized index. (1785) equivalent to $775,745 in 2021 (1807)
Grand Duchy of Tuscany 1823 Before 1823, 25,000 doubles (Tuscan lira) or 250,000 francs. *Error when using {{Inflation}}: |index=FR (parameter 1) not a recognized index.
Kingdom of Portugal 1822 20,000 francs *Error when using {{Inflation}}: |index=FR (parameter 1) not a recognized index.
Kingdom of Sardinia 1746– 1822 Under the treaty of 1746, 216,000 francs by 1822. *Error when using {{Inflation}}: |index=FR (parameter 1) not a recognized index.
Kingdom of France 1790– 1816 Before 1790, it paid 37,000 livres. After 1790, it pledged to pay 27,000 piastres, or 108,000 francs, and in 1816 committed to pay 200,000 francs. *Error when using {{Inflation}}: |end_year=2023 (parameter 4) is greater than the latest available year (2021) in index "UK". (–1789) Error when using {{Inflation}}: |index=FR (parameter 1) not a recognized index. (1790–)

Error when using {{Inflation}}: |index=FR (parameter 1) not a recognized index. (1816)

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland 1807 It pledged to pay 100,000 piastres, or 267,500 francs, in exchange for certain privileges. *Error when using {{Inflation}}: |index=FR (parameter 1) not a recognized index.
Kingdom of the Netherlands 1807–1826 In the treaty of 1826, it committed to paying 10,000 Algerian sequins, and in 1807, it paid 40,000 piastres, or 160,000 francs. *Error when using {{Inflation}}: |index=FR (parameter 1) not a recognized index.
Austrian Empire 1807 In 1807, paid an estimated 200,000 francs. *Error when using {{Inflation}}: |index=FR (parameter 1) not a recognized index.
United States 1795–1822 In 1795 paid 1,000,000 dollars annually, and $10 million over 12 years, in exchange for special privileges. Equipment accounted for 21,600 dollars.[254] *Error when using {{Inflation}}: |start_year=1795 (parameter 3) is lower than the earliest available year (1800) in index "US" and |end_year=2023 (parameter 4) is greater than the latest available year (2021) in index "US". (1795 alone)

*Error when using {{Inflation}}: |start_year=1795 (parameter 3) is lower than the earliest available year (1800) in index "US" and |end_year=2023 (parameter 4) is greater than the latest available year (2021) in index "US". (over 12 years)

Kingdom of Naples 1816–1822 Paid royalties estimated at 24,000 francs. Starting 1822, paid a royalty of 12,000 francs every two years. *Error when using {{Inflation}}: |index=FR (parameter 1) not a recognized index. (1816) Error when using {{Inflation}}: |index=FR (parameter 1) not a recognized index. (1822)
Kingdom of Norway 1822 Royalty of 12,000 francs every two years. *Error when using {{Inflation}}: |index=FR (parameter 1) not a recognized index.
Denmark 1822 Paid 180,000 francs every two years. *Error when using {{Inflation}}: |index=FR (parameter 1) not a recognized index.
Kingdom of Sweden 1822 120,000 francs every two years. *Error when using {{Inflation}}: |index=FR (parameter 1) not a recognized index.
Republic of Venice 1747–1763 From 1747, it paid 2,200 gold coins annually, which in 1763 became an estimated 50,000 riyals (Venetian lira). *Error when using {{Inflation}}: |index=IT (parameter 1) not a recognized index. (1763)

Trade

External trade

File:Reinier Nooms - Shipping off Algiers.jpg
Dutch shipping off Algiers. Oil on canvas, Reinier Nooms (1623/1624–1664). National Maritime Museum.

Along with tribute payments, Algerian wheat exports to Europe replaced privateering as its primary source of income in the 18th century and became the core factor in trade relations between Algiers and Britain, Genoa and France.[292] The French Compagnie royale d'Afrique (fr) controlled French wheat imports in 1741 from the Algerian Constantinois.[327] Merouche wrote:[328] <templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

[...] well over 100,000 quintals of wheat (is) exported each year from Algerian ports in 1698 and 1699. The great movement of cereal exports began in 1693 and would expand thereafter. The century of wheat succeeded the century of privateering.

Most Algerian exports went to Marseille, predominantly by sea. Exports included, according to historian William Spencer, "carpets, embroidered handkerchiefs, silk scarves, ostrich feathers,[329] wax, wool, animal hides and skins, dates, and a coarse native linen similar to muslin".[330] The sea trade was run by the Bacri and Busnash families, who had settled in Algeria by 1720.[331] After acting as mediators in the Christian slave trade in the heyday of privateering,[331] they entangled the public interest of the Regency with the private interests of their own companies through their European contacts.[245] These merchants amassed massive wealth from dealing in goods such as wheat and leather and from their monopoly on olive oil and customs taxation. They became the financiers of the dey and mediators between Algiers and Europe, both in diplomacy and in trade.[331]

Large caravans of 300 mules went overland to neighbouring Tunisia twice a year.[332] The city of Constantine was a meeting point for caravans from the Sahara, Tunis and Algiers; they were loaded with woven fabric, carpets, chechias, luxury goods and coffee. Caravans from the south brought dates and wool products like burnouses and haiks.[333] In the west, Tlemcen was linked by trade routes as far as Tafilalt in Morocco and Timbuktu in the Sudan. The former brought salt, spices, Moroccan leather, silk and gun wood; the latter, ostrich feathers, ivory, slaves, vermillion, copper and gold.[333] "Desert oases have historically been essential, strategic locations in trans-Saharan routes," wrote Chaibou and Bonnet, naming "Bilma (Niger), Ouardane (Mauritania), In Salah (Algeria), Taoudenni (Mali), Iférouane, Chinguetti (Mauritania), Kufra, and Murzuk (Libya)."[334] Trade did not flourish. The state awarded monopolies, often to the highest bidder, as a source of guaranteed revenue, and imposed a 2.5 percent duty on exports and 12.5 percent on imports. Trade in military assets such as cannons and small arms was prohibited.[335]

Internal trade

Overland trade used animals to transport goods. Carts could be used on suitable roads. The many official posts of the Odjak and the makhzen tribes along the way provided security for caravans. In addition, caravanserais, locally known as fonduk, gave travelers a place to rest.[336] Products such as wool from the tribal interior were traded in bazaars (known locally as souks). These took the names of tribes preceded by days of the week, for example: Souk Al Arbaa Al-Attafs (lit. Wednesday market of Al-Attaf tribe). Souks formed hubs for trading agricultural products such as grain, olives, cattle, sheep and horses.[337] In urban marketplaces they bought imported jewelry textiles and pottery. Jewish intermediaries helped further exchanges between cities and the countryside.[337]

Administrative control over the Sahara was often loose, but Algiers's economic ties to it were very important,[338] and Algerian cities were among the main destinations of the trans-Saharan slave trade.[339] In the late 18th century the Regency "appears to have witnessed considerable commercial activity in the Algerian Sahara, related perhaps to the period of stability and prosperity under Dey Baba Mohammed ben-Osman, who ruled at Algiers from 1766 to 1791", Donald Holsinger wrote, "despite the picture of commercial decadence which has sometimes been painted for the Regency".[329]

Taxation

Some of the taxes levied by the Regency fell under Islamic law, including the cushr (tithe) on agricultural products, but some had elements of extortion.[340] Periodic tithes could only be collected from crops grown on private farmland near the towns; instead, nomadic tribes in the mountains paid a fixed tax, called garama (compensation), based on a rough estimate of their wealth. In addition, rural populations also paid a tax known as lazma (obligation) or ma'una (support) that paid for Muslim armies to defend the country from Christians. City dwellers had other taxes, including market taxes and dues to artisan guilds.[341] Beys also collected gifts (dannush) every six months for the deys and their chief ministers. Every bey had to personally bring dannush every three years. In other years, his khalifa (deputy) could take it to Algiers.[342]

The arrival of a bey or khalifa in Algiers with dannush was a notable event governed by a protocol setting out how to receive him and when his gifts would be given to the dey, his ministers, officials and the poor. The honors that the bey received depended on the value of the gifts he brought. Al-Zahar reported that the chief of the western province was expected to pay more than 20,000 doro in cash, half that in jewelry, four horses, fifty black slaves, woollen tilimsans, silk garments from Fez, and twenty quintals each of wax, honey, butter, and walnuts . Dannush from the Eastern Province was larger and included Tunisian perfumes and clothing.[340]

Agriculture

Agricultural production eventually overtook privateering as a source of Regency revenue.[56] Fallowing and crop rotation were widely practiced. Wheat, cotton, rice, tobacco, watermelon and corn were the most commonly grown products.[343] Cereals and livestock products especially constituted much of the export trade after providing for local consumption of oil, grain, wool, wax and leather.[344]

The state owned very fertile lands called fahs. Located near the main towns, these lands were granted to Turkish military personnel, Kouloughli families, makhzen tribes and urban notables under the azl system.[345] Fahs were cultivated by tenant farmers who received a fifth of the harvest under the khammas sharecropping system for common land.[346] The Metija provided it with various fruits and vegetables.[347] Algerian wine was particularly sought after in Europe for its quality.[348][347]

Vast areas of Algeria's land were known as arsh, where animal husbandry predominated.[349] Historian Mahfoud Kaddache (fr) stresses: "Arsh land, land of the tribes, belongs to the tribal community, it is frequently divided into two parts; the larger part, undivided, is used by the entire tribe and forms pasture areas, the second part is reserved for crops and allocated between families."[345] Lands classified as melk were under customary Berber law and were possessed and inherited through tribal families.[346][350]

Algeria's agricultural wealth came from the quality of the cultivated land, agricultural techniques (ploughs dragged by oxen, donkeys, mules, or camels), irrigation and water systems that supplied small collective dams. Mouloud Gaid (fr) wrote: "Tlemcen, Mostaganem, Miliana, Médéa, Mila, Constantine, M'sila, Aïn El-Hamma, etc., were always sought after for their green sites, their orchards and their succulent fruits."[351] South of the Tell Atlas, most of the western population and the people of the Sahara were pastoralists, nomads and semi-nomads who grew dates and bred sheep, goats and camels. Their products (butter, wool, skins, camel hair) were traded north[352] in their annual migration to summer pastures.[353]

Crafts

File:Pair of Flintlock Pistols MET DP215282.jpg
Coral-decorated pistols presented by the dey of Algiers as a gift to the Prince Regent (later George IV of Great Britain) in 1811 and 1819. Metropolitan Museum of Art

Manufacturing was restricted to shipyards, which built frigates of oak sourced from Kabylia. The smaller ports of Ténès, Cherchell, Dellys, Béjaïa and Djidjelli built shallops, brigs, galiots, tartanes and xebecs used to fish or transport goods between Algerian ports.[354] Christian slaves were employed in these shipyards, often managed by Christian renegades, and sometimes even free Christians as captains of armament or engineers of naval constructions, whose services were hired without a requirement to convert to Islam.[355] Several workshops supported repairs and rope-making.[356] The quarries of Bab El-Oued extracted stone, raw material for buildings and fortifications.[357] The Bab El-Oued foundries produced cannons of all sizes for the warships of the Algerian navy and for use as fort batteries and field artillery.[354]

Cities were established centers for artisanry and served as hubs for international trade.[344] Residents of Nedroma, Tlemcen, Oran, Mostaganem, Kalaa, Dellys, Blida, Médéa, Collo, M'Sila, Mila and Constantine were mostly artisans and merchants. The most common crafts were weaving, woodturning, dyeing, rope-making and tool-making.[358] Algiers was home to foundries, shipyards, and workshops. Tlemcen had more than 500 looms. Artisans were prevalent even in small towns.[359]

Society

Urban population

File:Costumes algériens.tif
Moors of Algiers, by Jacob van Meurs in Description de l'Afrique by Olfert Dapper

At most 6% of the population lived in cities.[360] In 1808 Algerian society included around 10,000 Turks; a class of coulouglis emerged as offspring of Turkish soldiers and Algerian women.[361] In the 17th century the population of Algiers was dominated by refugees from Andalusia and also included about 35,000 White Christian slaves working on the docks and in quarries and shipyards.[362] By the late 19th century that number had dropped to about 2,000 and was only around 200 in 1830.[362] About 1,000 black slaves worked as household servants; many freed black slaves also worked on the docks as masons.[362] In the 18th century, French and Italian Jewish merchants began to arrive, a distinct and more affluent group than the Jewish minority among the earlier Andalusian arrivals.[362] Moors could hold legal and police powers within Algiers as mayors.[363] Guilds regulated most trade and, like city neighborhoods headed by amins, responded to emergencies and strengthened community solidarity.[364] The Muslim faith prevailed in every aspect of life.[365] Public business was carried out in both Arabic and Osmanli.[366]

In addition to butcher shops and grocery stores, Ibadi Mozabites operated bath houses.[364] The shops and bazaars clustered around the alleys off the single main street of the lower city near the harbor,[367][360] overlooking the sea in the lower town or strategically located at crossroads.[368]

The fraternal relations in the hierarchical system of the urban Algiers were devoid of rivalry between the few great merchants in the wealthy upper class and the poorer lower classes of shopkeepers, craftsmen and scholars.[369]

Social structures

The tribe was a primary social and political structure based upon family.[370] Competition among tribes for land and water was mediated through a sense of unity based on consanguinity, shared Islamic faith and their economic need to trade with each other, preventing dangerous social friction and encouraging unity against external threats.[370]

This system persisted under the Regency. The traditional isolation of the city from the hinterland ceased, ending the traditional divide between urban and rural areas of the central Maghreb.[371] Cities and villages articulated their own organizations within the tribal systems and confederations.[372] Although they depended on tribal society, cities weakened the political power and influence of tribes, which adapted but did not disappear. Their importance varied from region to region; they remained relatively important in the Aurès, for example.[373]

A complex link of interdependencies developed between tribes and the state as they adapted to government pressure.[373][374] They were assigned social roles; the Biskri Berbers were charged with street maintenance and guarding quarters, and the Berbers of Kabylia and Aurès frequently worked in Algiers.[375]

The state was sometimes necessary for the consolidation of the tribes; their relationships were complementary at times.[374] Makhzen tribes derived their legitimacy from their affiliation to the government, protecting urban areas, collecting taxes and exercising military control of the state in the countryside. The rayas tribes were tax-paying subjects, and the siba tribes were dissidents who opposed taxes, which reduced their surplus production.[376] However, they still depended on market access organised by the state and the makhzen tribes. The markets outside the territories dependent on the state were managed by the marabouts who very often acted as guarantors of tribal order.[373]

The political authority of the tribes depended either on their military strength or their religious lineage.[373] These two aristocracies—the religious brotherhoods who dominated the west, and the djouad (fr) strongman families of the east—often opposed one another.[377] Algerian society had three separate aristocracies:[378]

Culture

Education

Education in Algeria mainly took place in small primary schools (kuttabs) that focused on reading, writing and religion, especially in rural areas.[385] Imams, zawiyas, marabouts and elders did most of the teaching.[386] Literacy was so effectively taught in these religious schools that in 1830 the literacy rate in Algeria was higher than in France.[387] Qadis or muftis often taught at the madrasas of the larger cities, maintained through waqf and central government funding.[385] The students received education on Islamic jurisprudence and Islamic medicine. Afterwards they became teachers, joined the qadis and muftis or pursued further education in the universities of Tunis, Fez or Cairo.[385]

In the Zayyanid period, Tlemcen was a primary center of Islamic culture, but schools and universities there declined due to neglect. Abu Hammu II's madrasa, known as Yaqubiyya, fell into complete ruin,[388] as the military and naval Ottoman elites' strong belief that northern Christendom needed to be prevented from expanding their military into the Maghreb hampered the development of learning, so they chose to neglect intellectual culture in favour of building forts, navies and castles.[389] This decline ended only when Mohammed el Kebir, bey of Oran, significantly invested in renovating and rebuilding several new educational facilities in the region.[388]

Architecture

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

New Mosque (Djamaa el-Djedid) in Algiers, built in 1660–1661, an example of Ottoman and North African architecture blending in this period.[390]
Inside view of the dome of Ketchaoua Mosque
An authentic capital used in the mihrab of the Ketchoua Mosque

Architecture in Algiers during this period showed a convergence of Ottoman influence with local traditions.[391] Mosques began to be built with domes under Ottoman influence, but minarets generally still had square shafts in the local tradition instead of the round or octagonal shafts seen in other Ottoman provinces, where pencil-shaped minarets were symbols of Ottoman sovereignty.[392][393] The Alit Bitchin Mosque in Algiers was commissioned by its namesake in 1622.[392] The Djamaa el Djedid, built in 1660–1661, became one of the most important Hanafi mosques in Algiers.[394][395] Architecturally one of the most significant remaining mosques of this era, it exemplifies a mix of Ottoman, North African, and European design elements, with its main dome preceded by a large barrel-vaulted nave.[390] By the end of the 18th century, the city had over 120 mosques, including over a dozen congregational mosques.[396]

Of the emblematic Ketchaoua Mosque, built by Dey Hassan III Pasha, Moroccan statesman and historian Abu al-Qasim al-Zayyani wrote in 1795: "The money spent on it...was more than anyone could allow himself to spend except those whom God grants success."[397] Originally similar in design to the Ali Bitchin Mosque, its appearance radically changed under French colonial rule.[392]

After the Ottomans arrived, architectural ceramic tiles replaced zellij tiles decorated with stars and polygons used in geometric patterns in the medieval Maghreb.[398] Square decorative ceramic tiles were widespread in Algiers and Constantine, with simpler examples in Tlemcen.[399] According to Dr. Abdulaziz Al-Araj, "In the Turkish era tiles were characterized by...motifs in Islamic art such as epigraphic, geometric, and floral motifs."[400]

In addition to landscapes, seascapes, ships and animals, the tiles came in three types: Turkish, Tunisian and European (sourced from Italy, Spain and the Netherlands).[401] They decorated interior walls and floors, forming bands, patterns and frames around door jambs, window frames and balusters.[399]

Algiers was protected by a wall about 3.1 kilometres (1.9 mi) long with five gates.[402] Seafront fortifications were supplemented by forts outside the city, which included the "star fort" built above the qasba in 1568 to defend the landward approaches to the city,[403] the "twenty-four hour fort" in 1568–1569, and the Eulj Ali burj built in 1569 covering the Bab al-Oued beach. Facing south was the "emperor fort" or Sultan Kalassi, built between 1545 and 1580.[404]

The qasba occupied the highest point of the city. The lower town near the harbor was the center of Regency administration and contained the most important markets, mosques, palaces, janissary barracks and government buildings such as the mint.[402]

The construction of Djenina Palace ('Little Garden'), also called the Pasha's palace, began in 1552 by Salah Rais and finished in 1556.[405] Ali Bitchin's Spanish captive Emmanuel de Aranda described it as "a public structure for those who are advanced to that charge [i.e., the position of governor], well built after the modern way of Architecture". He added: "The most beautiful house in Algiers is that of Bacha [Bassa], or Viceroy, which is almost in the middle of the city. [It has] two small galleries one above the other, supported by a double row of columns of marble and porphyry."[406] The Djenina was located at the center of a larger complex known as the Dar al-Sultan until 1817, when Dey Ali Khodja moved to the Palace of the Dey in the qasba.[402] The only building from the Dar al-Sultan complex that remains today, the Dar 'Aziza Bint al-Bey, is believed to have been built in the 16th century.[407]

Sky seen from the courtyard of the Palais des rais
Galleries at the Hassan Pacha Palace
Tilework, Hassan III Pasha Khaznaji Palace, built 1791

Arts

Crafts

Three centuries of Ottoman influence in Algeria left many cultural elements of Turkish origin or influence, wrote Lucien Golvin.[408]

  • Brassware imported by janissaries likely inspired copper lanterns, trays, and ewers made in Algiers, Constantine and Tlemcen with Ottoman decorative elements like tulips and carnations.[408]
  • Ornate bronze door knockers were manufactured in Tlemcen until about 1930. Algiers and Constantine produced simpler examples.[408]
  • Saddlers made velvet-covered saddles embroidered with gold or silver thread, and bridles, belts, saddlecloths and boots with traditional Ottoman ornamentation.[409]
  • Ghiordés rugs and rugs from Kula seem to have influenced the early 19th-century adoption into the rugs of Hammam Guergour, Nemencha and Harakta tribes of large central lozenge-shaped medallions with arched lobes in a mihrab pattern, bordered by bands of floral elements. Those produced at the Qal'a of the Banu Rashid displayed multiple medallions in a more Andalusi style, and in the Amour mountains the Amour tribe (fr) continued to produce traditional tent rugs in geometric patterns.[409]
  • Clothing of janissaries, deys and other dignitaries was distinctive enough to be known in the Mediterranean as "Algerian style", including turbans and red sheshias, burnouses, kaftans, vests (sédria) embroidered with patterns, wide and baggy trousers belted with broad silk sashes, and babouche slippers. They were frequently armed with yatagans.[410]
  • Needle lace (chebika) and embroidery from Algiers were made under a ma'allema (teacher) on a horizontal loom (gargaf). Embroidery from Annaba and Djidjilli was multicolored with flat dots.[408]
Kaftan sent as part of a large gift from Dey Ali Abdi Pasha (fr) to the Swedish king in 1731 in connection with the peace treaty between Sweden and Algiers
Morisco, Chaouch and Moorish man, from Journey to the regency of Algiers, Claude Antoine Rozet (fr) (1798-1858)
Daughter of Hussein Dey, believed to be Amina Hanem or Nafissa Hanem (ca. 1820). Victoria and Albert Museum.

Music

New arrivals from Anatolia and Al-Andalus brought music to Algiers. Accented Ottoman military music with Sufi bektashi origins was played by janissary bands called mehterân.[411] Andalusi classical music brought to Algiers by Moriscos developed three styles; Tlemcenian gharnati, Constantine's ma'luf and sanaa in Algiers.[412] It was widespread in coffeehouses and often played by orchestras of tar, oud and rebab.[411]

Contemporary Algerian chaabi musician El-Hachemi Guerouabi recounts the exploits of corsairs against the Knights of Malta in his song Corsani Ghanem (English: Our ship captured a prize) based on 16th-century Algerian Arabic poetry by Imad Al-Din Doukkali.[413]

Musicians play sitting cross-legged on rich oriental rugs in a tiled room; men watch them, some accompanied by children, as a woman and two children descend a staircase in the background, and a servant brings tea.
Detail, Andalusian orchestra in Tlemcen. (2009) Bachir Yellès

Legacy

Europeans saw Algiers as "the center of pirate activity – that captured the imagination of Europe as a fearsome and vicious enemy."[414] The 19th‑century French historian Henri de Grammont said:

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

It gave the world the singular spectacle of a nation living from privateering and living only by it, resisting the incessant attacks directed against it with incredible vitality, submitting three quarters of Europe and the United States of America to the humiliation of an annual tribute; all this, despite unimaginable disorder and daily revolutions, which would have killed any other association, and which seemed to be essential to the existence of this strange people.[415]

British historian James McDougall called this claim a "colonial myth". He pointed out that after the 17th century, termed by Merouche the "century of privateering",[416] less lucrative privateering remained symbolic of a corsair state. Tribute payments to guarantee peace, trade, customs, taxation and increased agricultural production brought in most of the revenue of the Regency in the 18th century,[120] which Merouche termed the "century of wheat".[416]

American historian John Baptist Wolf argued that the local population resented occupation by a republic of foreign "cutthroats and thieves", and that the French "civilizing mission", although carried out by brutal means, offered much to the Algerian people.[417] However British historian Peter Holt indicates that this antagonism never took a nationalist aspect and was balanced by strong ties such as shared faith, social structure and culture.[418] Nacereddin Saidouni argues that although Algeria was not a nation in the modern sense, it was nevertheless a local political entity that helped deepen the sense of community among large segments of the Algerian population in the countryside and cities.[279] Yahia Boaziz noted that the Ottomans repelled European attacks and convinced the population to abide by the decisions of a centralised state.[419]

Historians John Douglas Ruedy and William Spencer write that the Ottomans in North Africa created an Algerian political entity with all the classical attributes of statehood and a high standard of living.[420][lower-alpha 10] Historian Mahfoud Kaddache (fr) considered the Ottoman period "catalytic to the modern geopolitical and national development of Algeria."[421] Saidouni affirms that Algeria took a similar path as the rest of North African states that gradually imposed their sovereignty, as it was no different from Muhammad Ali's Egypt, Husainid dynasty's Tunisia and Alawi's Morocco.[279] However, Ruedy notes that the end of tribal rivalries and the emergence of a true nation state occurred only after long years of brutal French conquest and colonial implantation and unrelenting Algerian resistance, culminating in the Algerian war of independence in 1954.[422]

See also

<templatestyles src="Div col/styles.css"/>

Notes

  1. According to American consul James Leander Cathcart: "The gate (of the Dey's palace) is covered with a terrace which is surrounded with a gilt railing in the center of which is a flag staff mounted with a gilt crescent on which the banners of the nation as well as those of the Grand Signore and Mahomet are hoisted on Fridays and festivals."[7]
  1. Other names: Script error: The function "langx" does not exist., Script error: The function "langx" does not exist.
  2. In the historiography of the Regency of Algiers, it has been called the "Kingdom of Algiers",[29] "Republic of Algiers",[423] "State of Algiers",[424] "State of El-Djazair",[425] "Ottoman Regency of Algiers",[424] and "Ottoman Algeria",[426] The current division of the Maghreb goes back to the three regencies of the 16th century: Algiers, Tunis and Tripoli. Algiers became the capital of its state and this term in the international acts applied to both the city and the country which it ordered: الجزائر (El-Djazâ'ir). However a distinction was made in the spoken language between on the one hand El-Djazâ'ir, the space which was neither the Extreme Maghreb, nor the regency of Tunis, and on the other hand, the city commonly designated by the contraction دزاير (Dzayer) or in a more classic register الجزائر العاصمة (El-Djazâ'ir El 'âçima, Algiers the Capital).[427] The Regency, which lasted over three centuries, shaped what Arab geographers designate as جزيرة المغرب (Djazirat El Maghrib). A political and administrative organization participated in the establishment of the Algerian: وطن الجزائر (watan el djazâïr, country of Algiers) and the definition of its borders with its neighbors to the east and west.[47] In European languages, El Djazâïr became Alger, Argel, Algiers, Algeria, etc. In English, a progressive distinction was made between Algiers, the city, and Algeria, the country. Whereas in French, Algiers designated both the city and the country, under the forms of "Kingdom of Algiers" or "Republic of Algiers". "Algerians" as a demonym is attested in writing in French as early as 1613 and its use has been constant since that date. Meanwhile in the English lexicology of the time, Algerian is "Algerine", which referred to the political entity that later became Algeria.[50]
  3. According to Merouche "It is first of all a new state integrated into a large empire, an "Imperial state", having at the same time all the attributes of a state in the sense of that time but which moreover constituted a largely autonomous province within the Ottoman Empire. The evolution of the status of the province towards a de-facto independence does not change the fundamentally Ottoman character of the state".([[:en:#Template:Sfnlink/prefixMerouche2002|Merouche (2002)]] p. 10)
  4. Algerian historian Mahfoud Kaddache (fr) wrote that "Algeria was first a regency, a kingdom-province of the Ottoman Empire and then a state with great autonomy, independent even, sometimes called a kingdom or military republic by historians, but which still recognized the spiritual authority of the caliph of Istanbul". ([[:en:#Template:Sfnlink/prefixKaddache1998|Kaddache (1998)]] p. 233)
  5. William Spencer notes: "For three centuries, Algerine foreign relations were conducted in such a manner as to preserve and advance the state's interests in total indifference to the actions of its adversaries, and to enhance Ottoman interests in the process. Algerine foreign policy was flexible, imaginative, and subtle; it blended an absolute conviction of naval superiority and belief in the permanence of the state as a vital cog in the political community of Islam, with a profound understanding of the fears, ambitions, and rivalries of Christian Europe." ([[:en:#Template:Sfnlink/prefixSpencer1976|Spencer (1976)]] pp. xi)
  6. The Chamber of Commerce of Marseilles complained in a memoir in 1783: "Everything announces that this trade will one day imperceptibly be of some consideration, because the country has by itself a capital fund which has given the awakening to the peoples who live there, and that nothing is so common today, to see Algerians and Jews domiciled in Algiers coming to Marseilles to bring us the products of this kingdom." ([[:en:#Template:Sfnlink/prefixKaddache2003|Kaddache (2003)]] p. 538)
  7. American consul in Algiers William Shaler would describe the Algerian regency's government as following: "The merits of this government have been proved by its continuance, with few variations in it forms of administration, for three centuries. It is in fact a military republic with a chief elective for life, and upon a small scale resembling that of the Roman Empire after the death of Commodus. This government ostensibly consists of a sovereign chief, who is termed the Dey of Algiers, and a Divan, or great Council, indefinite in point of number, which is composed of the ancient military who are or have been commanders of corps. The divan elects the Deys, and deliberates upon such affairs as he chooses to lay before them." ([[:en:#Template:Sfnlink/prefixShaler1826|Shaler (1826)]] p. 16)
  8. Ottoman Algerian dignitary Hamdan Khodja recalls: "The old officials who had completed their work were always repeating to their young successors: “We are foreigners. We did not obtain the submission of this people and the possession of this land by force and sword; Rather, thanks to kindness and leniency, we have become leaders !!! We were not statesmen in our country, and we did not obtain our titles and positions except on this land. Therefore, this country is our homeland, and our duty and interests require us to exert ourselves in contributing to the success and prosperity of this people. Just like we do it for ourselves.” ([[:en:#Template:Sfnlink/prefixKhoja2016|Khoja (2016)]] pp. 106-107)
  9. (fol. 172a(L)-171b(R))
  10. William Spencer writes: "Algiers' status in the Mediterranean world was merited by its contributions as well as the exploits of the corsairs. Through the medium of Regency government, Ottoman institutions brought stability to North Africa. The flow of Anatolian recruits and the attachment to the Porte introduced many elements of the eclectic Ottoman civilization into the western Mediterranean. Corsair campaigns produced a fusion of Ottoman with native Maghribi and European styles, social patterns, architecture, crafts, and the like. A regular system of revenue collection, an efficient subsistence agriculture, and a well-established legitimate commerce along with corsair profits brought to the Regency a high standard of living. Its lands, while they never corresponded to the total territory conquered by France and incorporated into French Algeria, were homogeneous, well managed, and formed of an effective and collaborating social mixture the exact opposite of the situation which prevailed during the one hundred and thirty years of French control." ([[:en:#Template:Sfnlink/prefixSpencer1976|Spencer (1976)]] pp. xi-xii)

References

Citations

  1. 1.0 1.1 Somel 2010, p. 16.
  2. McDougall 2017, p. 37,45.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Naylor 2015, p. 121.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Ruedy 2005, p. 19.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Saidouni 2009, p. 195.
  6. Agoston 2009, p. 33.
  7. Cathcart & Newkirk 1899, p. 94
  8. Sluglett 2014, p. 68.
  9. McDougall 2017, p. 38.
  10. Merouche 2007, p. 186.
  11. Merouche 2007, p. 140.
  12. Panzac 2005, p. 22.
  13. Al-Jilali 1994, p. 187.
  14. Al-Madani 1965, pp. 64–71.
  15. 15.0 15.1 Julien 1970, p. 275.
  16. Julien 1970, pp. 275-276.
  17. Pitcher 1972, p. 107.
  18. Liang 2011, p. 142.
  19. 19.0 19.1 Julien 1970, p. 278.
  20. Wolf 1979, p. 8.
  21. Gaïd 2014, p. 39.
  22. Kaddache 2003, p. 334.
  23. Garcés 2002, pp. 21-22.
  24. Al-Jilali 1994, p. 40.
  25. Al-Madani 1965, p. 175.
  26. Abun Nasr 1987, p. 149.
  27. Hess 2011, p. 64.
  28. Spencer 1976, p. 22.
  29. 29.0 29.1 De Tassy 1725, pp. 1, 3, 5, 7, 12, 15.
  30. 30.0 30.1 30.2 30.3 Julien 1970, p. 280.
  31. Khoja 2016, p. 79.
  32. 32.0 32.1 32.2 32.3 Spencer 1976, pp. 21–22.
  33. Kaddache 2003, p. 337.
  34. 34.0 34.1 Hess 2011, p. 65.
  35. Spencer 1976, pp. 22–23.
  36. 36.0 36.1 36.2 Kaddache 2003, p. 335.
  37. Merouche 2007, pp. 52.
  38. Wolf 1979, pp. 9-10.
  39. 39.0 39.1 Wolf 1979, p. 9.
  40. Imber 2019, p. 209.
  41. Vatin 2012, p. 155.
  42. 42.0 42.1 Dewald 2004, p. 20.
  43. Atsushi 2018, p. 20.
  44. Merouche 2007, p. 53.
  45. Merouche 2007, p. 121.
  46. Kaddache 1998, p. 233.
  47. 47.0 47.1 47.2 Merouche 2007, p. 139.
  48. Merouche 2002, p. 13.
  49. Vatin 2012, pp. 155-156.
  50. 50.0 50.1 Merouche 2002, p. 10.
  51. 51.0 51.1 Hess 2011, p. 66.
  52. Hess 2011, pp. 65-66.
  53. Roberts 2014, p. 154.
  54. Hess 2011, p. 68.
  55. Julien 1970, p. 281.
  56. 56.0 56.1 56.2 Naylor 2015, pp. 119–120.
  57. Naylor 2015, p. 117.
  58. Spencer 1976, p. 47.
  59. 59.0 59.1 Brosch 1905, p. 109.
  60. Servantie 2021, p. 90.
  61. Jenkins 2010, p. 55.
  62. Al-Jilali 1994, pp. 53–54.
  63. Saidouni 2020, pp. 252-253.
  64. 64.0 64.1 Garcés 2002, p. 23.
  65. Merouche 2007, p. 65.
  66. 66.0 66.1 66.2 Abun Nasr 1987, p. 160.
  67. 67.0 67.1 67.2 Rinehart 1985, p. 24.
  68. 68.0 68.1 68.2 Seybold 1987, p. 268.
  69. 69.0 69.1 Holt, Lambton & Lewis 1970, p. 255.
  70. Jamieson 2013, p. 56.
  71. De Haëdo 2004, p. 161.
  72. Konstam 2016, p. 42.
  73. 73.0 73.1 73.2 Merouche 2007, pp. 140–141.
  74. Heinsen-Roach 2019, p. 37.
  75. Julien 1970, p. 292.
  76. Panzac 2005, p. 25.
  77. Spencer 1976, p. 27.
  78. Hess 2011, p. 74.
  79. Kaddache 2003, p. 386.
  80. Roberts 2014, p. 191.
  81. Merouche 2007, pp. 72-73.
  82. Holt, Lambton & Lewis 1970, pp. 251-252.
  83. Crowley 2009, p. 82.
  84. Carr 2009, p. 139.
  85. Abun Nasr 1987, pp. 157–158.
  86. 86.0 86.1 Julien 1970, pp. 294-295.
  87. 87.0 87.1 Abun Nasr 1987, pp. 157-158.
  88. 88.0 88.1 88.2 Julien 1970, p. 295.
  89. Mercier 1888, p. 71.
  90. Levtzion 1975, p. 406.
  91. Jamieson 2013, p. 51.
  92. Julien 1970, p. 296.
  93. 93.0 93.1 Holt, Lambton & Lewis 1970, p. 252.
  94. Garrot 1910, p. 425.
  95. Naylor 2006, p. 275.
  96. Jamieson 2013, p. 52.
  97. Jamieson 2013, p. 59.
  98. Hess 2011, p. 89.
  99. Hess 2011, p. 93.
  100. Truxillo 2012, p. 73.
  101. Jamieson 2013, pp. 67–68.
  102. Levtzion 1975, p. 408.
  103. Roberts 2014, p. 196.
  104. Bellil 1999, pp. 124–125.
  105. Abitbol 1979, p. 48.
  106. 106.0 106.1 Julien 1970, p. 301.
  107. Cory 2016, pp. 63–64.
  108. Hess 2011, p. 116.
  109. Braudel 1995, pp. 882-883.
  110. 110.0 110.1 Nyrop 1972, p. 16.
  111. Ruedy 2005, p. 17.
  112. Spencer 1976, p. 59.
  113. Hourani 2013, p. 186.
  114. Davidann 2019, p. 121.
  115. 115.0 115.1 115.2 Holt, Lambton & Lewis 1970, p. 256.
  116. 116.0 116.1 Julien 1970, p. 303.
  117. Boaziz 2007, p. 38.
  118. Khoja 2016, pp. 135–136..
  119. Panzac 2005, p. 25, 27.
  120. 120.0 120.1 120.2 120.3 McDougall 2017, p. 45.
  121. 121.0 121.1 Julien 1970, p. 312.
  122. Wolf 1979, p. 181.
  123. Garrot 1910, pp. 444.
  124. Garrot 1910, pp. 444-445.
  125. 125.0 125.1 Kaddache 2003, p. 401.
  126. Bachelot 2012, p. 27.
  127. Heinsen-Roach 2019, pp. 37-38.
  128. Dan 1649, p. 110.
  129. 129.0 129.1 129.2 Burman 2022, p. 350.
  130. 130.0 130.1 Atsushi 2018, pp. 25-28.
  131. 131.0 131.1 Abun Nasr 1987, p. 159.
  132. Bachelot 2012, p. 28.
  133. Jamieson 2013, p. 75.
  134. Braudel 1995, p. 885.
  135. Lowenheim 2009, pp. 94-95.
  136. Egilsson 2018, p. 18.
  137. Jamieson 2013, p. 227.
  138. De Grammont 1887, p. 183.
  139. Jamieson 2013, p. 100.
  140. De Grammont 1887, p. 194.
  141. Mercier 1888, p. 237.
  142. Julien 1970, pp. 305-306.
  143. Panzac 2005, p. 10.
  144. 144.0 144.1 Crawford 2012, p. 181.
  145. Garrot 1910, p. 383.
  146. Jamieson 2013, pp. 75–78.
  147. Boaziz 2007, p. 201.
  148. Heinsen-Roach 2019, p. 38.
  149. Julien 1970, p. 302.
  150. Boaziz 2007, p. 35.
  151. 151.0 151.1 151.2 Boyer 1973, p. 162.
  152. De Grammont 1887, p. 208.
  153. 153.0 153.1 Plantet 1889, p. xxi.
  154. 154.0 154.1 Boaziz 2007, p. 42.
  155. 155.0 155.1 Al-Jilali 1994, p. 158.
  156. De Grammont 1887, p. 209.
  157. Kaddache 2003, p. 397.
  158. Bachelot 2012, p. 39.
  159. Wolf 1979, p. 235.
  160. Boyer 1973, pp. 167-168.
  161. Boyer 1973, pp. 168–169.
  162. Merouche 2007, pp. 202–204.
  163. ibn al-Mufti 2009, p. 67.
  164. Lane-Poole & Kelley 1896, p. 262.
  165. Saidouni 2009, pp. 159-160.
  166. Merouche 2007, p. 254.
  167. 167.0 167.1 Naylor 2006, p. 391.
  168. Merouche 2007, p. 229.
  169. 169.0 169.1 Kaddache 2003, p. 416.
  170. Spencer 1976, p. 118.
  171. Panzac 2020, pp. 22–25.
  172. Maameri 2008, pp. 127–128.
  173. Koskenniemi, Walter & Fonseca 2017, p. 204.
  174. Pitts 2018, p. 111.
  175. Koskenniemi, Walter & Fonseca 2017, p. 205.
  176. Panzac 2005, p. 9.
  177. Wolf 1979, p. 175.
  178. Wolf 1979, p. 176.
  179. Panzac 2005, pp. 25-26.
  180. Panzac 2005, pp. 26-28.
  181. Maameri 2008, pp. 128-137.
  182. Koskenniemi, Walter & Fonseca 2017, p. 203-204.
  183. 183.0 183.1 Panzac 2005, p. 40.
  184. Rouard De Card 1906, pp. 11–15.
  185. Panzac 2005, p. 28.
  186. Plantet 1894, p. 3.
  187. Rouard De Card 1906, p. 15.
  188. 188.0 188.1 Julien 1970, p. 313.
  189. De Grammont 1879–1885.
  190. Matar 2000, p. 150.
  191. Wolf 1979, pp. 220-221.
  192. 192.0 192.1 Wolf 1979, pp. 309–311.
  193. Panzac 2005, pp. 32-34.
  194. Coffman et al. 2014, p. 177.
  195. Galibert 1843, p. 226.
  196. Mössner 2013, p. 15.
  197. Panzac 2005, p. 38.
  198. 198.0 198.1 198.2 Julien 1970, p. 319.
  199. Boaziz 2007, p. 50.
  200. 200.0 200.1 200.2 Boaziz 2007, p. 51.
  201. Julien 1970, p. 305.
  202. De Grammont 1887, p. 265.
  203. Barrie 1987, p. 25.
  204. Anderson 2014, p. 256.
  205. Cornevin 1962, p. 405.
  206. Spencer 1976, p. 121.
  207. Garrot 1910, p. 511.
  208. Mercier 1888, p. 313.
  209. Abitbol 2014, p. 631.
  210. Daumas & Yver 2008, p. 102.
  211. Kaddache 2003, p. 415.
  212. Chenntouf 1999, p. 204.
  213. Levtzion 1975, p. 278.
  214. Panzac 2005, p. 12.
  215. 215.0 215.1 Holt, Lambton & Lewis 1970, p. 279.
  216. Panzac 2005, p. 11.
  217. Saidouni 2009, p. 143.
  218. Ogot 1998, p. 194.
  219. Al-Madani 1965, pp. 461–462.
  220. Al-Madani 1965, p. 481.
  221. Masters 2013, p. 40.
  222. Kaddache 2003, p. 425.
  223. Kaddache 2003, pp. 425, 426, 436.
  224. Al-Jilali 1994, p. 220.
  225. Panzac 2005, pp. 13-14.
  226. Wolf 1979, p. 293.
  227. Wolf 1979, pp. 290-291.
  228. ibn Bekir 1860, p. 211–219.
  229. Ben Namaani 2017, p. 217–234.
  230. Ogot 1998, p. 195.
  231. 231.0 231.1 231.2 Holt, Lambton & Lewis 1970, p. 278.
  232. ibn Zahhār 1974, pp. 23-24.
  233. Boaziz 2007, p. 70.
  234. Saidouni 2009, p. 163.
  235. Al-Jilali 1994, pp. 263-265.
  236. Levtzion 1975, p. 279.
  237. Jamieson 2013, p. 181.
  238. Al-Jilali 1994, p. 240.
  239. Spencer 1976, pp. 132–135.
  240. Spencer 1976, p. 135.
  241. De Grammont 1887, p. 328.
  242. Wolf 1979, p. 306.
  243. Wolf 1979, p. 307.
  244. 244.0 244.1 244.2 McDougall 2017, p. 46.
  245. 245.0 245.1 Wolf 1979, p. 318.
  246. Martin 2003, pp. 42–43.
  247. Julien 1970, p. 326.
  248. Mercier 1903, pp. 308–319.
  249. Panzac 2005, p. 296.
  250. Al-Jilali 1994, p. 308.
  251. Cour 1987, p. 947.
  252. Saidouni 2009, p. 280.
  253. Mercier 1888, p. 468.
  254. 254.0 254.1 254.2 Rinehart 1985, p. 27.
  255. Spencer 1976, pp. 136.
  256. 256.0 256.1 Panzac 2005, p. 270.
  257. McDougall 2017, p. 47.
  258. Panzac 2005, pp. 284–292.
  259. Wolf 1979, p. 331.
  260. Ruedy 2005, p. 41.
  261. Wolf 1979, p. 332.
  262. Lange 2024, p. 163.
  263. Wolf 1979, p. 333.
  264. 264.0 264.1 264.2 Meredith 2014, p. 216.
  265. Bosworth 2008, p. 24.
  266. Ruedy 2005, pp. 42-43.
  267. Saidouni 2009, p. 197.
  268. Hess 2011, p. 69.
  269. Naylor 2015, p. 120.
  270. Spencer 1976, pp. 42-44.
  271. Seybold 1987, p. 267.
  272. Julien 1970, p. 384.
  273. Malcolm 2019, p. 378.
  274. 274.0 274.1 Thomson 1987, p. 114.
  275. 275.0 275.1 275.2 Coller 2020, pp. 127–128.
  276. 276.0 276.1 Merouche 2007, p. 123.
  277. Levtzion 1975, p. 404.
  278. Abun Nasr 1987, p. 158.
  279. 279.0 279.1 279.2 Saidouni 2020, p. 478.
  280. Wolf 1979, p. 289.
  281. 281.0 281.1 Julien 1970, p. 321.
  282. Khoja 2016, p. 98.
  283. Wolf 1979, pp. 291-292.
  284. Saidouni 2009, pp. 162-163.
  285. Saidouni 2009, pp. 161-162.
  286. Julien 1970, p. 324.
  287. Wolf 1979, p. 292.
  288. Spencer 1976, p. 61.
  289. Khoja 2016, pp. 101-102.
  290. Spencer 1976, p. 62.
  291. Wolf 1979, p. 290.
  292. 292.0 292.1 292.2 McDougall 2017.
  293. 293.0 293.1 Kaddache 2003, p. 432.
  294. Spencer 1976, p. 91.
  295. M'Hamsadji 2005, p. 31.
  296. Wolf 1979, p. 10.
  297. Boyer 1970b, pp. 102–104.
  298. Spencer 1976, p. 50.
  299. Isichei 1997, p. 272.
  300. ibn Bekir 1860, p. 219.
  301. Khoja 2016, p. 95.
  302. Verdès-Leroux 2009, p. 289.
  303. 303.0 303.1 Merouche 2007, p. 152.
  304. Merouche 2007, p. 187.
  305. Kaddache 2003, p. 413.
  306. Boyer 1970b, pp. 122–123.
  307. Panzac 2005, p. 15.
  308. Ruedy 2005, pp. 32–33.
  309. Abun Nasr 1987, p. 169.
  310. Boaziz 2007, p. 25.
  311. 311.0 311.1 Chaney 2015, p. 7.
  312. Boaziz 2007, p. 200.
  313. Tikka, Uusitalo & Wyżga 2023, p. 72.
  314. Julien 1970, p. 308.
  315. Panzac 2005, p. 120.
  316. 316.0 316.1 Tikka, Uusitalo & Wyżga 2023, p. 73.
  317. 317.0 317.1 317.2 Julien 1970, p. 309.
  318. 318.0 318.1 Panzac 2005, p. 30.
  319. Chaney 2015, pp. 7-8.
  320. Garrot 1910, p. 460.
  321. Chaney 2015, p. 8.
  322. Chaney 2015, pp. 8-9.
  323. Garrot 1910, p. 465.
  324. Garrot 1910, p. 466.
  325. Friedman 1980, p. 624, 629.
  326. 326.0 326.1 326.2 Saidouni 2009, p. 141.
  327. Merouche 2007, pp. 261.
  328. Merouche 2007, p. 236.
  329. 329.0 329.1 Holsinger 1980, p. 61.
  330. Spencer 1976, p. 104.
  331. 331.0 331.1 331.2 Atsushi 2018, p. 35-36.
  332. Kaddache 2003, p. 538.
  333. 333.0 333.1 Kaddache 2003, p. 537.
  334. Chaibou & Bonnet 2019.
  335. Spencer 1976, p. 106.
  336. Kaddache 2003, p. 235.
  337. 337.0 337.1 Kaddache 2003, pp. 536.
  338. Kouzmine 2009, p. 659.
  339. Wright 2007, p. 51.
  340. 340.0 340.1 Abun Nasr 1987, pp. 164–165.
  341. Hoexter 1983, pp. 19–39.
  342. McDougall 2017, p. 40.
  343. Ruedy 2005, p. 29.
  344. 344.0 344.1 Ruedy 2005, p. 30.
  345. 345.0 345.1 Kaddache 2003, p. 498.
  346. 346.0 346.1 McDougall 2017, p. 19.
  347. 347.0 347.1 McDougall 2017, p. 23.
  348. Spencer 1976, p. 100.
  349. McDougall 2017, p. 20.
  350. Rinehart 1985, p. 30.
  351. Gaïd 2014, p. 189.
  352. Ruedy 2005, p. 31.
  353. Holsinger 1980, p. 59.
  354. 354.0 354.1 Panzac 2005, pp. 52-55.
  355. Garrot 1910, p. 381.
  356. Panzac 2005, p. 56.
  357. Rashid 2021, p. 303.
  358. Kaddache 2003, pp. 519-520.
  359. Kaddache 2003, pp. 520-521.
  360. 360.0 360.1 Ruedy 2005, p. 21.
  361. Isichei 1997, p. 273.
  362. 362.0 362.1 362.2 362.3 Ruedy 2005, pp. 22.
  363. Spencer 1976, p. 54.
  364. 364.0 364.1 Ruedy 2005, p. 23.
  365. Spencer 1976, pp. 88-89.
  366. Stevens 1797, p. 147.
  367. Spencer 1976, p. 29.
  368. Kaddache 2003, p. 512.
  369. Rashid 2021, p. 312.
  370. 370.0 370.1 Ruedy 2005, pp. 24-25.
  371. Spencer 1976, p. 68.
  372. McDougall 2017, p. 25.
  373. 373.0 373.1 373.2 373.3 373.4 Ben Hounet 2009, pp. 37–41.
  374. 374.0 374.1 Vatin 1982, pp. 13–16.
  375. Spencer 1976, p. 68-69.
  376. Ruedy 2005, pp. 33–34.
  377. Julien 1970, p. 325.
  378. Ferrah 2004, p. 150.
  379. Yacono 1993, p. 5.
  380. Yacono 1993, p. 110.
  381. Damurdashi & Muḥammad 1991, p. 43.
  382. Abun Nasr 1987, p. 241.
  383. Naylor 2006, p. 93.
  384. Hoexter 1998, p. 13.
  385. 385.0 385.1 385.2 Abi-Mershed 2010, pp. 50-51.
  386. Murray-Miller 2017, p. 129.
  387. Ruedy 2005, p. 103.
  388. 388.0 388.1 Gorguos 1857, pp. 408–410.
  389. Al-Jilali 1994, p. 520.
  390. 390.0 390.1 Bloom 2020, pp. 239–241.
  391. Bloom 2020, pp. 238-240.
  392. 392.0 392.1 392.2 Bloom 2020, p. 238.
  393. Kuban 2010, p. 585.
  394. Bloom 2020, p. 239.
  395. Marçais 1955, p. 433.
  396. Johansen 1999, p. 118.
  397. Al-Jilali 1994, p. 528.
  398. Laʻraj 1990, p. 17.
  399. 399.0 399.1 Laʻraj 1990, p. 18.
  400. Laʻraj 1990, p. 245.
  401. Laʻraj 1990, p. 19.
  402. 402.0 402.1 402.2 Bloom 2020, p. 237.
  403. Kaddache 2003, p. 509.
  404. Julien 1970, p. 289.
  405. Al-Jilali 1994, p. 89.
  406. Egilsson 2018, pp. 210-211.
  407. Bloom 2020, p. 242.
  408. 408.0 408.1 408.2 408.3 Golvin 1985, pp. 201–226.
  409. 409.0 409.1 Golvin 1985, p. 214.
  410. Spencer 1976, p. 71.
  411. 411.0 411.1 Spencer 1976, p. 85.
  412. Shannon 2015, p. 48.
  413. Hamdi 2002, p. 37.
  414. Entelis 2016, p. 20.
  415. De Grammont 1887, p. I.
  416. 416.0 416.1 Merouche 2007, p. 20.
  417. Wolf 1979, pp. I,290,338.
  418. Holt, Lambton & Lewis 1970, p. 284.
  419. Boaziz 2007, p. 63.
  420. Ruedy 2005, pp. 42.
  421. Naylor 2006, p. 392.
  422. Ruedy 2005, pp. 43-44.
  423. De Tassy 1725, p. 300 chap. XX.
  424. 424.0 424.1 Ghalem & Ramaoun 2000, p. 27.
  425. Kaddache 1998, p. 3.
  426. Panzac 1995, p. 62.
  427. Koulakssis & Meynier 1987, pp. 7,17.

Bibliography

  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. {{WikidataCoord}} – malformed coordinate data