Interwar Britain

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Interwar Britain (1919-1939) was a period of peace and relative economic stagnation 1919-1939. In politics the Liberal Party collapsed and the Labour Party became the main challenger to the dominant Conservative Party throughout the period. The Great Depression impacted Britain less severely economically and politically than other major nations, although there were severe pockets of long-term unemployment and hardship, especially in mining districts and in Scotland and North West England.

Historian Arthur Marwick sees a radical transformation of British society resulting from the Great War, a deluge that swept away many old attitudes and brought in a more egalitarian society. He sees the famous literary pessimism of the 1920s as misplaced, arguing there were major positive long-term consequences of the war to British society. He points to an energized self-consciousness among workers that quickly built up the Labour Party, the coming of partial women's suffrage, and an acceleration of social reform and state control of the economy. He sees a decline of deference toward the aristocracy and established authority in general, and the weakening among youth of traditional restraints on individual moral behaviour. The chaperone faded away; village chemists sold contraceptives.[1] Marwick says that class distinctions softened, national cohesion increased, and British society became more equal.[2]

Politics and economics of 1920s

Expanding the welfare state

Two major programmess dealing with unemployment and housing that permanently expanded the welfare state passed in 1919 and 1920 with surprisingly little debate, even as the Conservatives dominated parliament.

The Unemployment Insurance Act 1920 expanded the provisions of the National Insurance Act 1911. It set up the dole system that provided 39 weeks of unemployment benefits to practically the entire civilian working population except domestic servants, farm workers, and civil servants. Funded in part by weekly contributions from both employers and employed, it provided weekly payments of 15s for unemployed men and 12s for unemployed women. It passed at a time of very low unemployment. Historian Charles Mowat calls these laws "Socialism by the back door," and notes how surprised politicians were when the costs to the Treasury soared during the high unemployment of 1921.[3]

Housing

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

The rapid expansion of housing was a major success story of the interwar years, standing in sharp contrast to the United States, where new housing construction practically collapsed after 1929. The total housing stock In England and Wales was 7.6 million in 1911; 8.0 million in 1921; 9.4 million in 1931; and 11.3 million in 1939.[4]

The influential Tudor Walters Report of 1918 set the standards for council house design and location for the next 90 years..[5] It recommended housing in short terraces, spaced at 70 feet (21 m) at a density of 12 to the acre.[6] With the Housing and Town Planning Act of 1919 Lloyd George set up a system of government housing that followed his 1918 campaign promises of "homes fit for heroes."[7] Called the "Addison Act," it required local authorities to survey their housing needs, and start building houses to replace slums. The treasury subsidized the low rents.[8] Older women could now vote. Local politicians consulted with them and in response put more emphasis on such amenities as communal laundries, extra bedrooms, indoor lavatories, running hot water, separate parlours to demonstrate their respectability, and practical vegetable gardens rather than manicured lawns.[9] [10] Progress was not automatic, as shown by the troubles of rural Norfolk. Many dreams were shattered as local authorities had to renege on promises they could not fulfill due to undue haste, impossible national deadlines, debilitating bureaucracy, lack of lumber, rising costs, and the non-affordability of rents by the rural poor.[11]

In England and Wales 214,000 multi-unit council buildings were built by 1939; the Ministry of Health became largely a ministry of housing.[12] Council housing accounted for 10 percent of the housing stock in Britain by 1938, peaking at 32 percent in 1980, and dropping to 18 percent by 1996, where it held steady for the next two decades. [13]

Increasingly the British ideal was home ownership, even among the working class. Rates of home ownership rose steadily from 15 percent before 1914, to 32 percent by 1938, and 67 percent by 1996.[14] Local building societies were primarily responsible. In the 1920s favourable tax policies encouraged substantial investment in the societies, creating huge reserves for lending. Beginning in 1927, the societies encouraged borrowing through gradual liberalization of mortgage terms.[15]

Working class families proved eager to purchase their council homes when the Thatcher government offered a good financial bargain in the 1980s.[16]

Conservative control

Stanley Baldwin was Conservative Prime Minister between 1923–1924, 1924–1929 and 1935–1937.

The Lloyd-George coalition fell apart in 1922. Stanley Baldwin, as leader of the Conservative Party (1923–37) and as Prime Minister (in 1923–24, 1924–29 and 1935–37), dominated British politics.[17] His mixture of strong social reforms and steady government proved a powerful election combination, with the result that the Conservatives governed Britain either by themselves or as the leading component of the National Government. He was the last party leader to win over 50% of the vote (in the general election of 1931). Baldwin's political strategy was to polarize the electorate so that voters would choose between the Conservatives on the right and the Labour Party on the left, squeezing out the Liberals in the middle.[18] The polarization did take place and while the Liberals remained active under Lloyd George, they won few seats and were a minor factor until they joined a coalition with the Conservatives in 2010. Baldwin's reputation soared in the 1920s and 1930s, but crashed after 1945 as he was blamed for the appeasement policies toward Germany, and as admirers of Churchill made him the Conservative icon. Since the 1970s Baldwin's reputation has recovered somewhat.[19]

1929 Conservative poster attacking the Labour Party

In May 1923 Prime Minister Bonar Law resigned because of ill health and was replaced by Baldwin. Having won an election just the year before, Baldwin's Conservative party had a comfortable majority in the Commons and could have waited another four years, but the government was concerned. Baldwin felt the need to receive a new mandate from the people. Oxford historian (and Conservative MP) J.A.R. Marriott depicts the gloomy national mood:

The times were still out of joint. Mr. Baldwin had indeed succeeded in negotiating (January 1923) a settlement of the British debt to the United States, but on terms which involved an annual payment of £34 million, at the existing rate of exchange. The French remained in the Ruhr. Peace had not yet been made with Turkey; unemployment was a standing menace to national recovery; there was continued unrest among the wage-earners, and a significant strike among farm labourers in Norfolk. Confronted by these difficulties, convinced that economic conditions in England called for a drastic change in fiscal policy, and urged thereto by the Imperial Conference of 1928, Mr. Baldwin decided to ask the country for a mandate for Preference and Protection.[20][21]

The result however backfired on Baldwin, who lost a host of seats to Labour and the Liberals. For the first time in history, Labour formed a government. However in 1924 Baldwin and the Conservatives returned with a large majority. Ross McKibbin finds that the political culture of the interwar period was built around an anti-socialist middle class, supported by the Conservative leaders, especially Baldwin.[22]

Economics

Taxes rose sharply during the war and never returned to their old levels. A rich man paid 8% of his income in taxes before the war, and about a third afterwards. Much of the money went on unemployment benefits. About 5% of the national income every year was transferred from the rich to the poor. A. J. P. Taylor argues most people "were enjoying a richer life than any previously known in the history of the world: longer holidays, shorter hours, higher real wages."[23]

The British economy was lacklustre in the 1920s, with sharp declines and high unemployment in heavy industry and coal, especially in Scotland and Wales. Exports of coal and steel halved by 1939 and the business community was slow to adopt the new labour and management principles coming from the US, such as Fordism, consumer credit, eliminating surplus capacity, designing a more structured management, and using greater economies of scale.[24] For over a century the shipping industry had dominated world trade, but it remained in the doldrums despite various stimulus efforts by the government. With the very sharp decline in world trade after 1929, its condition became critical.[25]

Chancellor of the Exchequer Winston Churchill put Britain back on the gold standard in 1925, which many economists blame for the mediocre performance of the economy. Others point to a variety of factors, including the inflationary effects of the World War and supply-side shocks caused by reduced working hours after the war.[26]

By the late 1920s, economic performance had stabilised, but the overall situation was disappointing, for Britain had fallen behind the United States as the leading industrial power. There also remained a strong economic divide between the north and south of England during this period, with the south of England and the Midlands fairly prosperous by the Thirties, while parts of south Wales and the industrial north of England became known as "distressed areas" due to particularly high rates of unemployment and poverty. Despite this, the standard of living continued to improve as local councils built new houses to let to families rehoused from outdated slums, with up to date facilities including indoor toilets, bathrooms and electric lighting now being included in the new properties. The private sector enjoyed a housebuilding boom during the 1930s.[27]

Labour

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

During the war, trade unions were encouraged and their membership grew from 4.1 million in 1914 to 6.5 million in 1918. They peaked at 8.3 million in 1920 before relapsing to 5.4 million in 1923.[28][29]

Coal was a sick industry; the best seams were being exhausted, raising the cost. Demand fell as oil began replacing coal for fuel. The 1926 general strike was a nine-day nationwide walkout of 1.3 million railwaymen, transport workers, printers, dockers, iron workers and steelworkers supporting the 1.2 million coal miners who had been locked out by the owners. The miners had rejected the owners' demands for longer hours and reduced pay in the face of falling prices.[30] The Conservative government had provided a nine-month subsidy in 1925 but that was not enough to turn around a sick industry. To support the miners the Trades Union Congress (TUC), an umbrella organization of all trades unions, called out certain critical unions. The hope was the government would intervene to reorganize and rationalize the industry, and raise the subsidy. The Conservative government had stockpiled supplies and essential services continued in operation using students and middle class volunteers. All three major parties opposed the strike. The Labour Party leaders did not approve and feared it would tar the party with the image of radicalism, for the Comintern in Moscow had sent instructions for Communists to aggressively promote the strike. The general strike itself was largely non-violent, but the miners' lockout continued and there was violence in Scotland. It was the only general strike in British history, for TUC leaders such as Ernest Bevin considered it a mistake. Most historians treat it as a singular event with few long-term consequences, but Martin Pugh says it accelerated the movement of working-class voters to the Labour Party, which led to future gains.[31][32] The Trade Disputes and Trade Unions Act 1927 made general strikes illegal and ended the automatic payment of union dues to the Labour Party. That act was largely repealed in 1946. The coal industry used up the more accessible coal. As costs rose, output fell from 267 million tons in 1924 to 183 million in 1945.[33] The Labour government nationalised the mines in 1947.

Starting in 1909, Liberals, led especially by Lloyd George, promoted the idea of a minimum wage for farm workers. Resistance from landowners was strong, but success was achieved by 1924.[34] According to Robin Gowers and Timothy J. Hatton, the impact In England and Wales was significant. They estimate that it raised wages for farm labourers by 15 per cent by 1929, and by more than 20 per cent in the 1930s. It reduced the employment of such labourers by 54,000 (6.5 per cent) in 1929 and 97,000 (13.3 per cent) in 1937. They argue, "The minimum wage lifted out of poverty many families of farm labourers who remained employed, but it significantly lowered the incomes of farmers, particularly during the 1930s."[35]

Food

After the War many new food products became available to the typical household, with branded foods advertised for their convenience. The shortage of servants was felt in the kitchen, but now instead of an experienced cook spending hours on difficult custards and puddings the housewife could purchase instant foods in jars, or powders that could be quickly mixed. Breakfast porridge from branded, more finely milled, oats could now be cooked in two minutes, not 20. American-style dry cereals began to challenge the porridge and bacon and eggs of the middle classes, and the bread and margarine of the poor. Shops carried more bottled and canned goods and fresher meat, fish and vegetables. While wartime shipping shortages had sharply narrowed choices, the 1920s saw many new kinds of foods--especially fruits--imported from around the world, along with better quality, packaging, and hygiene. Middle class households now had ice boxes or electric refrigerators, which made for better storage and the convenience of buying in larger quantities.[36]

Numerous studies in the Depression years documented that the average consumer ate better than before. Seebohm Rowntree reported that the "standard to workers in 1936 was about 30 percent higher than it was in 1899."[37] Food prices were low, but the advantage went overwhelmingly to the middle and upper classes, with the poorest third of the population suffering from sustained poor nutrition. Starvation was not a factor, but widespread hunger was. The dairy industry was producing too much, and profits were too low, so the government used the Milk Marketing Board to give cash subsidies to dairy farmers– a policy described by The Economist as the "economics of Bedlam." The deleterious effects on poor children were obvious to teachers. In 1934 the government began a programme of charging school children a halfpenny a day for a third of a pint of milk. This dramatically improved their nutrition, and the new demand kept up the wholesale price of milk paid to farmers. About half the nation's school children participated by 1936. In the Second World War milk was distributed free, and participation rose to 90 percent. Indeed, the rationing system of the wartime years sharply improved the nutrition of poorest third, together with their capacity for manual labour. [38]

Great Depression

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

The Great Depression originated on Wall Street in the United States in late 1929 and quickly spread to the world. The main impact it written in 1931.[clarification needed][39] However, Britain had never experienced the boom that had characterized the US, Germany, Canada and Australia in the 1920s, so its bust was much less severe and ended sooner.[40]

By summer 1931 the world financial crisis began to overwhelm Britain; investors across the world started withdrawing their gold from London at the rate of £2½ millions a day.[41][42] Credits of £25 millions each from the Bank of France and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and an issue of £15 millions fiduciary note slowed, but did not reverse the British crisis. The financial crisis now caused a major political crisis in Britain in August 1931. With deficits mounting, the bankers demanded a balanced budget; the divided cabinet of Prime Minister Ramsay MacDonald's Labour government agreed; it proposed to raise taxes, cut spending and most controversially, to cut unemployment benefits 20%. The attack on welfare was totally unacceptable to the Labour movement. MacDonald wanted to resign, but King George V insisted he remain and form an all-party coalition "National government." The Conservative and Liberals parties signed on, along with a small cadre of Labour, but the vast majority of Labour leaders denounced MacDonald as a traitor for leading the new government. Britain went off the gold standard, and suffered relatively less than other major countries in the Grade Depression. In the 1931 British election the Labour Party was virtually destroyed, leaving MacDonald as Prime Minister for a largely Conservative coalition.[43][44]

The flight of gold continued, however, and the Treasury finally was forced to abandon the gold standard in September 1931. Until now the government had religiously followed orthodox policies, which demanded balanced-budgets and the gold standard. Instead of the predicted disaster, cutting loose from gold proved a major advantage. Immediately the exchange rate of the pound fell by 25%, from $4.86 for one pound to $3.40. British exports were now much more competitive, which laid the ground for a gradual economic recovery. The worst was over.[45][46]


Britain's world trade fell in half (1929–33), the output of heavy industry fell by a third. Employment and profits plunged in nearly all sectors. At the depth in summer 1932, registered unemployed numbered 3.5 million, and many more had only part-time employment.

Particularly hardest hit by economic problems were the north of England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales; unemployment reached 70% in some areas at the start of the 1930s (with more than 3 million out of work nationally) and many families depended entirely on payments from local government known as the dole.

Organized protests

Doomsayers on the left such as Sidney and Beatrice Webb, J.A. Hobson, and G.D.H. Cole repeated the dire warnings they had been making for years about the imminent death of capitalism, only now far more people paid attention.[47] Starting in 1935 the Left Book Club provided a new warning every month, and built up the credibility of Soviet-style socialism as an alternative.[48]

In 1936, by which time unemployment was lower, 200 unemployed men made a highly publicized march from Jarrow to London in a bid to show the plight of the industrial poor. Although much romanticized by the Left, the Jarrow Crusade marked a deep split in the Labour Party and resulted in no government action.[49] Unemployment remained high until the war absorbed all the job seekers. George Orwell's book The Road to Wigan Pier gives a bleak overview of the hardships of the time.

Historiography

The economic crisis of the early 1930s, and the response of the Labour and National governments to the depression, have generated much historical controversy. Apart from the major pockets of long-term high unemployment, Britain was generally prosperous. Historian Piers Brendon writes:

Historians, however, have long since revised this grim picture, presenting the devil's decade as the cradle of the affluent society. Prices fell sharply between the wars and average incomes rose by about a third. The term "property-owning democracy" was coined in the 1920s, and three million houses were built during the 1930s. Land, labour and materials were cheap: a bungalow could be purchased for £225 and a semi for £450. The middle class also bought radiograms, telephones, three-piece suites, electric cookers, vacuum cleaners and golf clubs. They ate Kellogg's Corn Flakes ("never miss a day"), drove to Odeon cinemas in Austin Sevens (costing £135 by 1930) and smoked Craven A cigarettes, cork-tipped "to prevent sore throats". The depression spawned a consumer boom.[50]

In the decades immediately following the Second World War, most historical opinion was critical of the governments of the period. Certain historians, such as Robert Skidelsky in his Politicians and the Slump, compared the orthodox policies of the Labour and National governments unfavourably with the more radical proto-Keynesian measures advocated by David Lloyd George and Oswald Mosley, and the more interventionist and Keynesian responses in other economies: Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal in the United States, the Labour government in New Zealand, and the Social Democratic government in Sweden. Since the 1970s opinion has become less uniformly hostile. In the preface to the 1994 edition, Skidelsky argues that recent experience of currency crises and capital flight make it hard to be so critical of the politicians who wanted to achieve stability by cutting labour costs and defending the value of the currency.

Foreign policy

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Britain had suffered little physical devastation during the war but the cost in death and disability and money were very high. In the Khaki Election of 1918, coming a month after the Allied victory over Germany, Lloyd George promised to impose a harsh treaty on Germany. At the Paris Peace Conference in early 1919, however, he took a much more moderate approach. France and Italy demanded and achieved harsh terms, including German admission of guilt for starting the war (which humiliated Germany), and a demand that Germany pay the entire Allied cost of the war, including veterans' benefits and interest. Britain reluctantly supported the Treaty of Versailles, although many experts, most famously John Maynard Keynes, thought it too harsh on Germany [51][52][53]

Britain began to look on a restored Germany as an important trading partner and worried about the effect of reparations on the British economy. In the end the United States financed German debt payments to Britain, France and the other Allies through the Dawes Plan, and Britain used this income to repay the loans it borrowed from the U.S. during the war.

Vivid memories of the horrors and deaths of the World War made Britain and its leaders strongly inclined to pacifism in the interwar era.[54]

1920s

Britain maintained close relationships with France and the United States, rejected isolationism, and sought world peace through naval arms limitation treaties,[55] and peace with Germany through the Locarno treaties of 1925. A main goal was to restore Germany to a peaceful, prosperous state.[56]

With disarmament was high on the agenda, Britain played a major role following the United States in the Washington Naval Conference of 1921 in working toward naval disarmament of the major powers. By 1933 disarmament had collapsed and the issue became rearming for a war against Germany.[57]

Within abandoned to centuries of its key foreign policy of paramount naval strength equal to or greater than the next two naval powers. Instead it accepted equality with United States, and weakness in Asian waters relative to Japan. It promised to not strengthen the fortifications of Hong Kong, which were within range of Japan. The treaty with Japan was not renewed, But Japan at the time was not engaged in expansion activities of the sort that grew momentous from 1931 onward. London did secure a permit strengthening of friendship with Washington. [58]

Politically the coalition government of Prime Minister David Lloyd George depended primarily on Conservative Party support. He increasingly antagonized his supporters with foreign policy miscues. The Chanak Crisis of 1922 brought Britain to the brink of war with Turkey, but the Dominions were opposed and the British military was hesitant, so peace was preserved, but Lloyd George lost control of the coalition and was replaced as Prime Minister.[59]

Britain maintained close relationships with France and the United States; however the U.S. refused to renegotiate its wartime loans. In the 1920s Britain rejected isolationism and sought world peace through naval arms limitation treaties,[60] and peace with Germany through the Locarno treaties of 1925. A main goal was to restore Germany to a peaceful, prosperous state.

The success at Locarno in handling the German question impelled Foreign Secretary Austen Chamberlain, working with France and Italy, to find a master solution to the diplomatic problems of Eastern Europe and the Balkans. It proved impossible to overcome mutual antagonisms, because Chamberlain's program was flawed by his misperceptions and fallacious judgments.[61]

1930s

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

The Dominions (Canada, Australia, South Africa and New Zealand) achieved virtual independence in foreign policy in the Statute of Westminster 1931, though each depended heavily upon British naval protection.[62] After 1931 trade policy favoured the "imperial preference" with higher tariffs against the U.S. and all others outside the Commonwealth.[63]

The great challenge came from dictators, first Benito Mussolini of Italy from 1923, then from 1933 Adolf Hitler of a much more powerful Nazi Germany. Britain and France led the policy of non-interference in the Spanish Civil War (1936–39). The League of Nations proved disappointing to its supporters; it was unable to resolve any of the threats posed by the dictators. British policy was to "appease" them in the hopes they would be satiated. League-authorized sanctions against Italy for its invasion of Ethiopia had support in Britain but proved a failure and were dropped in 1936.[64]

Germany was the difficult case. By 1930 British leaders and intellectuals largely agreed that all major powers shared the blame for war in 1914, and not Germany alone as the Treaty of Versailles specified. Therefore, they believed the punitive harshness of the Treaty of Versailles was unwarranted, and this view, adopted by politicians and the public, was largely responsible for supporting appeasement policies down to 1938. That is, German rejections of treaty provisions seemed justified.[65]

Coming of Second World War

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

By late 1938 it was clear that war was looming, and that Germany had the world's most powerful military. The British military leaders warned that Germany would win a war, and Britain needed another year or two to catch up in terms of aviation and air defense. The final act of appeasement came when Britain and France sacrificed Czechoslovakia to Hitler's demands at the Munich Agreement of 1938.[66] Instead of satiation Hitler seized all of Czechoslovakia and menaced Poland.At last in 1939 Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain dropped appeasement and stood firm in promising to defend Poland. Hitler however cut a deal with Joseph Stalin to divide Eastern Europe; when Germany did invade Poland in September 1939, Britain and France declared war; the British Commonwealth followed London's lead.[67]

Popular culture

As leisure, literacy, wealth, ease of travel, and a broadened sense of community grew in Britain from the late 19th century onward, there was more time and interest in leisure activities of all sorts, on the part of all classes.[68] Drinking was differentiated by class. with upper-class clubs, and working-class and middle-class pubs. However, drinking as a way of spending leisure time and spare cash declined during the Depression and pub attendance never returned to 1930 levels; it fell far below prewar levels.[69] Taxes were raised on beer, and there were more alternatives now at hand, such as cigarettes (which attracted 8/10 men, and 4/10 women), the talkies, the dance halls, and Greyhound racing. Football pools offered the excitement of supporting the home team, and at a cost of 3s, maybe making some money. New estates with small, inexpensive houses offered gardening as an outdoor recreation. Church attendance decline to half the level of 1901.[70]

The annual vacation became common. Tourists flocked to seaside resorts; Blackpool hosted 7 million visitors a year in the 1930s.[71] Organized leisure was primarily a male activity, with middle-class women allowed in at the margins. Participation in sports and all sorts of leisure activities increased for the average Englishman, and his interest in spectator sports increased dramatically. By the 1920s the cinema and radio attracted all classes, ages and genders in very large numbers, with young women taking the lead.[72] Working-class men wearing flat caps and munching fish and chips were boisterous football spectators. They sang along at the music hall, fancied their pigeons, gambled on horse racing, and took the family to Blackpool in summer. Political activists complained that working-class leisure diverted men away from revolutionary agitation.[73]

Cinema and radio

Film director Alfred Hitchcock, 1955

The British film industry emerged in the 1890s, and built heavily on the strong reputation of the London legitimate theatre for actors, directors, and producers.[74][75][76] The problem was that the American market was so much larger and richer. It bought up the top talent, especially when Hollywood came to the fore in the 1920s and produced over 80 percent of the total world output. Efforts to fight back were futile — the government set a quota for British made films, but it failed. Hollywood furthermore dominated the lucrative Canadian and Australian markets. Bollywood (based in Bombay) dominated the huge Indian market.[77] The most prominent directors remaining in London were Alexander Korda, an expatriate Hungarian, and Alfred Hitchcock. There was a revival of creativity in the 1933-45 era, especially with the arrival of Jewish filmmakers and actors fleeing the Nazis.[78][79] Meanwhile, giant palaces were built for the huge audiences that wanted to see Hollywood films. In Liverpool 40 percent of the population attended one of the 69 cinemas once a week; 25 percent went twice. Traditionalists grumbled about the American cultural invasion, but the permanent impact was minor.[80]

In radio British audiences had no choice apart from the upscale programming of the BBC, which had a monopoly on broadcasting. John Reith (1889 – 1971), an intensely moralistic engineer, was in full charge. His goal was to broadcast, "All that is best in every department of human knowledge, endeavor and achievement.... The preservation of a high moral tone is obviously of paramount importance."[81] Reith succeeded in building a high wall against an American-style free-for-all in radio in which the goal was to attract the largest audiences and thereby secure the greatest advertising revenue. There was no paid advertising on the BBC; all the revenue came from a licence fee chargedthe possession of receivers. Highbrow audiences, however, greatly enjoyed it.[82] At a time when American, Australian and Canadian stations were drawing huge audiences cheering for their local teams with the broadcast of baseball, rugby and hockey, the BBC emphasized service for a national, rather than a regional audience. Boat races were well covered along with tennis and horse racing, but the BBC was reluctant to spend its severely limited air time on long football or cricket games, regardless of their popularity.[83]

Sports

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

The British showed a more profound interest in sports, and in greater variety, than any rival. They gave pride of place to such moral issues as sportsmanship and fair play.[84] Cricket became symbolic of the Imperial spirit throughout the Empire. Football proved highly attractive to the urban working classes, which introduced the rowdy spectator to the sports world. In some sports there was significant controversy in the fight for amateur purity especially in rugby and rowing. New games became popular almost overnight, including golf, lawn tennis, cycling and hockey. Women were much more likely to enter these sports than the old established ones. The aristocracy and landed gentry, with their ironclad control over land rights, dominated hunting, shooting, fishing and horse racing.[85][86]

Cricket had become well-established among the English upper class in the 18th century, and was a major factor in sports competition among the public schools. Army units around the Empire had time on their hands, and encouraged the locals to learn cricket so they could have some entertaining competition. Most of the Empire embraced cricket, with the exception of Canada.[87] Cricket test matches (international) began by the 1870s; the most famous is that between Australia and Britain for "The Ashes."[88]

For sports to become fully professionalized, coaching had to come first. It gradually professionalized in the Victorian era and the role was well established by 1914. In the First World War, military units sought out the coaches to supervise physical conditioning and develop morale-building teams.[89]

Reading

As literacy and leisure time expanded after 1900 reading became a popular pastime. New additions to adult fiction doubled during the 1920s, reaching 2800 new books a year by 1935. Libraries tripled their stock, and saw heavy demand for new fiction.[90] A dramatic innovation was the inexpensive paperback, pioneered by Allen Lane (1902–70) at Penguin Books in 1935. The first titles included novels by Ernest Hemingway and Agatha Christie. They were sold cheaply (usually sixpence) in a wide variety of inexpensive stores such as Woolworth's. Penguin aimed at an educated middle class "middlebrow" audience. It avoided the downscale image of American paperbacks. The line signalled cultural self-improvement and political education. The more polemical Penguin Specials, typically with a leftist orientation for Labour readers, were widely distributed during the Second World War.[91] However the war years caused a shortage of staff for publishers and book stores, and a severe shortage of rationed paper, worsened by the air raid on Paternoster Square in 1940 that burned 5 million books in warehouses.[92]

Romantic fiction was especially popular, with Mills and Boon the leading publisher.[93] Romantic encounters were embodied in a principle of sexual purity that demonstrated not only social conservatism, but also how heroines could control their personal autonomy.[94][95] Adventure magazines became quite popular, especially those published by DC Thomson; the publisher sent observers around the country to talk to boys and learn what they wanted to read about. The story line in magazines and cinema that most appealed to boys was the glamorous heroism of British soldiers fighting wars that were exciting and just.[96]

See also

Notes

  1. John Peel, "The manufacture and retailing of contraceptives in England." Population Studies 17.2 (1963): 113-125.
  2. Arthur Marwick, The Deluge: British Society and the First World War (1965)
  3. Mowat, Britain between the Wars: 1918–1940 (1955) pp 43–46
  4. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. Mark Swenarton, "Tudor Walters and Tudorbethan: reassessing Britain's inter-war suburbs." Planning perspectives 17.3 (2002): 267-286.
  6. John Burnett, A social history of housing : 1815-1985 (2nd ed. 1986) pp 222-26.
  7. Paul Wilding, "The Housing and Town Planning Act 1919—A Study in the Making of Social Policy." Journal of Social Policy 2#4 (1973): 317-334.
  8. Burnett, A social history of housing : 1815-1985 (1986) pp 226-34.
  9. Martin Pugh, We Danced All Night: A Social History of Britain Between the Wars (2009), pp 60-62
  10. Noreen Branson, Britain in the Nineteen Twenties (1976) pp 103-17.
  11. Annette Martin, "Shattered hopes and unfulfilled dreams: council housing in rural Norfolk in the early 1920s, Local Historian (2005) 35#2 pp 107-119.
  12. Charles Loch Mowat, Britain between the Wars: 1918–1940 (1955) pp 43–46
  13. Pat Thane, Cassel's Companion to 20th Century Britain 2001) 195-96.
  14. Peter Scott, "Marketing mass home ownership and the creation of the modern working-class consumer in inter-war Britain." Business History 50.1 (2008): 4-25.
  15. Jane Humphries, "Inter-war house building, cheap money and building societies: The housing boom revisited." Business History 29.3 (1987): 325-345.
  16. Norman Ginsburg, "The privatization of council housing." Critical Social Policy 25.1 (2005): 115-135.
  17. Stuart Ball, "Baldwin, Stanley, first Earl Baldwin of Bewdley (1867–1947)", Oxford Dictionary of National Biography 2004; online edn, January 2011 doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/30550
  18. Andrew J. Taylor, "Stanley Baldwin, Heresthetics and the Realignment of British Politics," British Journal of Political Science, (July 2005), 35#3 pp 429–63,
  19. Philip Williamson, "Baldwin's Reputation: Politics and History, 1937–1967," Historical Journal (March 2004) 47#1 pp 127–68 in JSTOR
  20. J. A. R. Marriott, Modern England: 1885-1945 (4th ed. 1948) p. 517
  21. Paul W. Doerr, British foreign policy 1919-1939 p.75-76
  22. Ross McKibbin, Parties and people: England, 1914–1951 (Oxford, 2010)
  23. A.J.P. Taylor, English History, 1915–1945 (1965) p 176, quote on p 317
  24. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  25. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  26. Solomos Solomou and Dimitris Vartis, "Effective Exchange Rates in Britain, 1920–1930," Journal of Economic History, (September 2005) 65#3 pp 850–59 in JSTOR
  27. R.J. Unstead, "A Century of Change: 1837–Today"
  28. B.R. Mitchell, Abstract of British Historical Statistics (1962) p 68
  29. Martin Pugh, Speak for Britain!: A New History of the Labour Party (2011) pp 100–27
  30. Medlicott, Contemporary England, pp 223–30
  31. Alastair Reid, and Steven Tolliday, "The General Strike, 1926," Historical Journal (1977) 20#4 pp 1001–12 in JSTOR
  32. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  33. B.R. Mitchell, Abstract of British Historical Statistics (1962) pp 116–17
  34. Alin Howkins and Nicola Verdon. "The state and the farm worker: the evolution of the minimum wage in agriculture in England and Wales, 1909–24." Agricultural history review 57.2 (2009): 257-274.
  35. Robin Gowers and Timothy J. Hatton,, "The origins and early impact of the minimum wage in agriculture." Economic History Review 50#1 (1997): 82-103.
  36. Robert Graves and Alan Hodge, The Long Week-End: A social history of Great Britain 1918-1939 (1940) pp. 175–176.
  37. Noreen Branson and Margot Heinemann, Britain in the 1930's (1971) pp 241-42.
  38. Branson and Heinemann, ;;Britain in the 1930's;; (1971) pp 223-42, quote page 230.44
  39. John Stevenson and Chris Cook, The Slump: Britain in the Great Depression (2009)
  40. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  41. Charles Loch Mowat, Britain between the wars, 1918-1940 (1955) pp 379-385.
  42. David Williams, "London and the 1931 financial crisis." Economic History Review 15.3 (1963): 513-528.
  43. Mowat, Britain between the wars, 1918-1940 (1955) pp 386-412.
  44. Sean Glynn and John Oxborrow, Interwar Britain : a social and economic history (1976) pp 67-73.
  45. Peter Dewey, War and progress: Britain 1914-1945 (1997) 224-32
  46. Diane B. Kunz, The battle for Britain's gold standard in 1931 (1987).
  47. Overy, Twilight Years, ch 2
  48. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  49. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  50. see Brendon review of Martin Pugh
  51. Margaret MacMillan, "Making War, Making Peace: Versailles, 1919." Queen's Quarterly 121.1 (2014): 24-38. online
  52. Margaret Macmillan, Paris 1919: Six Months that Changed the World (2001).
  53. Antony Lentin, Lloyd George and the lost peace: from Versailles to Hitler, 1919-1940 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2001).
  54. Michael Pugh, Liberal internationalism: the interwar movement for peace in Britain (2012).
  55. B. J. C. McKercher, "The politics of naval arms limitation in Britain in the 1920s." Diplomacy and Statecraft 4#3 (1993): 35-59.
  56. Frank Magee, "‘Limited Liability’? Britain and the Treaty of Locarno." Twentieth Century British History 6.1 (1995): 1-22.
  57. Raymond G. O'Connor, "The" Yardstick" and Naval Disarmament in the 1920's." Mississippi Valley Historical Review 45.3 (1958): 441-463. in JSTOR
  58. W.N. Medlicott, British foreign policy since Versailles, 1919-1963 (1968). pp 18-31
  59. Michael Laird, "Wars Averted: Chanak 1922, Burma 1945–47, Berlin 1948," Journal of Strategic Studies (1996) 19#3 pp 343-364.
  60. B. J. C. McKercher, "The politics of naval arms limitation in Britain in the 1920s." Diplomacy and Statecraft 4#3 (1993): 35-59.
  61. Dragan Bakić, "‘Must Will Peace’: The British Brokering of ‘Central European’and ‘Balkan Locarno’, 1925–9." Journal of Contemporary History 48.1 (2013): 24-56.
  62. K.C. Wheare, The Statute of Westminster, 1931 (1933).
  63. David L. Glickman, "The British imperial preference system." Quarterly Journal of Economics 61.3 (1947): 439-470. in Jstor
  64. James C. Robertson, "The Origins of British Opposition to Mussolini over Ethiopia." Journal of British Studies 9#1 (1969): 122-142.
  65. Catherine Ann Cline, "British Historians and the Treaty of Versailles." Albion 20#1 (1988): 43-58.
  66. David Faber, Munich, 1938: Appeasement and World War II (2010)
  67. Donald Cameron Watt, How War Came: Immediate Origins of the Second World War, 1938–39 (1990)
  68. Peter J. Beck, "Leisure and Sport in Britain." in Chris Wrigley, ed., A Companion to Early Twentieth-Century Britain (2008): 453-69.
  69. Peter Haydon, The English pub: a history (1994).
  70. Branson and Heinemann, Britain in the 1930's (1971) pp 269-70
  71. John K. Walton, The English seaside resort. A social history 1750-1914 (1983).
  72. John K. Walton, Leisure in Britain, 1780-1939 (1983).
  73. Beck, "Leisure and Sport in Britain." p 457
  74. Charles Barr, All our yesterdays: 90 years of British cinema (British Film Institute, 1986).
  75. Amy Sargeant, British Cinema: A Critical History (2008).
  76. Jeffrey Richards, Age of the Dream Palace: Cinema & Society in Britain 1930-1939 (1990).
  77. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  78. Kevin Gough-Yates, "Jews and exiles in British cinema." The Leo Baeck Institute Yearbook 37#.1 (1992): 517-541.
  79. Tobias Hochscherf, The Continental Connection: German-Speaking Émigrés and British Cinema, 1927-45 (2011).
  80. Charles Loch Mowat, Britain between the Wars 1918-1940 (1955) pp 246-50
  81. Mowat, Britain between the Wars 1918-1940 (1955) p 242.
  82. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  83. Mike Huggins, "BBC Radio and Sport 1922-39," Contemporary British History (2007) 21#4 pp 491-515. online
  84. Peter J. Beck, "Leisure and Sport in Britain." in Chris Wrigley, ed., A Companion to Early Twentieth-Century Britain (2008): 453-69.
  85. Derek Birley, Land of sport and glory: Sport and British society, 1887-1910 (1995)
  86. Derek Birley, Playing the Game: Sport and British Society, 1914-1945 (1995)
  87. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  88. Derek Birley, A Social History of English Cricket (1999) excerpt
  89. Dave Day, Professionals, Amateurs and Performance: Sports Coaching in England, 1789–1914 (2012)
  90. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  91. Nicholas Joicey, "A Paperback Guide to Progress Penguin Books 1935–c. 1951." Twentieth Century British History 4#1 (1993): 25-56. online
  92. Joseph McAleer, Popular Reading and Publishing in Britain: 1914-1950 (1992).
  93. Joseph McAleer, Passion's fortune: the story of Mills & Boon (1999).
  94. Nicola Humble, The Feminine Middlebrow Novel, 1920s to 1950s: Class, Domesticity, and Bohemianism (2001).
  95. Alison Light, Forever England: femininity, literature and conservatism between the wars (1991).
  96. Ernest Sackville Turner, Boys Will Be Boys: The Story of Sweeney Todd, Deadwood Dick, Sexton Blake, Billy Bunter, Dick Barton et al. (3rd ed. 1975).

Further reading

  • Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (2004) online; short scholarly biographies of all the major people
  • Addison, Paul and Harriet Jones, eds. A Companion to Contemporary Britain: 1939–2000 (2005) excerpt and text search, emphasis on historiography
  • Aldcroft, Derek H. The British Economy. Volume 1: The Years of Turmoil, 1920-1951 (1986); economic historian; uses only basic descriptive statistics
  • Blythe, Ronald. The age of illusion: England in the twenties and thirties, 1919-1940 (Faber & Faber, 2014).
  • Branson, Noreen. Britain in the Nineteen Twenties (1976).
  • Branson, Noreen and Branson, Margot Heinemann. Britain in the Nineteen Thirties (1971)
  • Broadberry S. N. The British Economy between the Wars (Basil Blackwell 1986)
  • Constantine, Stephen. Social Conditions in Britain 1918-1939 (Routledge, 2006).
  • Crowther, A, British Social Policy, 1914-1939 (1988).
  • Dewey, Peter. War and Progress: Britain 1914-1945 (Routledge, 2014).
  • Elton, G.R. Modern Historians on British History 1485-1945: A Critical Bibliography 1945-1969 (1969), annotated guide to 1000 history books on every major topic, plus book reviews and major scholarly articles. online
  • Farmer Alan. British Foreign and Imperial Affairs 1919–39 (2000), textbook
  • Feiling, Keith. The Life of Neville Chamberlain (1947)online
  • Gardiner, Juliet. The 30s: An Intimate History(2010), 853 pp; popular social history
  • Glynn, Sean. and John Oxborrow, Interwar Britain: A social and economic history (1976).
  • Graves, Robert R. and Alan Hodge, The Long Week-End: A Social History of Great Britain 1918-1939 (1940), classic popular history
  • Hattersley, Roy. Borrowed Time: The Story of Britain Between the Wars (2008)
  • Leventhal, Fred M., ed. Twentieth-century Britain: an encyclopedia (Peter Lang, 2002); 910pp.
  • Loades, David, ed. Reader's Guide to British History (2 vol 2003), 1610 pp, historiography
  • McElwee, William. Britain's Locust Years: 1918-1940 (1962), 298pp; political focus online
  • Marriott, J. A. R. Modern England, 1885-1945 A History Of My Own Times (4th ed. 1949) pp 418-566 online free
  • Medlicott, W. N. Contemporary England 1914–1964 (1967), emphasis on politics and foreign policy
  • Medlicott, W. N. British foreign policy since Versailles, 1919-1963 (1968).
  • Mowat, Charles Loch. Britain Between the Wars, 1918-1940 (1955), 690pp; thorough scholarly coverage; emphasis on politics online
  • Napper, Lawrence. British Cinema and Middlebrow Culture in the Interwar Years (2010)
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.; about intellectuals
  • Pollard, Sidney. The Development of the British Economy, 1914-1990 (4th ed. 1991).
  • Pugh, Martin. We Danced All Night: A Social History of Britain Between the Wars (2009), popular history by a scholar
  • Ramsden, John, ed. The Oxford Companion to Twentieth-Century British Politics (2005) excerpt and text search
  • Reynolds, David. Britannia Overruled: British Policy and World Power in the Twentieth Century (2nd ed. 2000) excerpt and text search, major survey of British foreign policy to 1999
  • Richardson H. W. "The Economic Significance of the Depression in Britain," Journal of Contemporary History (1969) 4#4 pp. 3–19 in JSTOR
  • Seaman, L.C.B. Post-Victorian Britain 1902-1951 (1966), pp 105-316; political survey
  • Skidelsky R. Politicians and the Slump: The Labour Government of 1929-33 (Macmillan, 1967).
  • Smart, Nick. National Government 1931-40 (1999)
  • Somervell, D.C. The Reign of King George V, (1936) 550pp; wide ranging political, social and economic coverage; online free
  • Somervell, D.C. British Politics since 1900 (1950) 280pp online
  • Stevenson, John. British society, 1914-45 (Penguin, 1984), 503pp; major scholarly history
  • Stevenson, John. Social conditions in Britain between the wars (1977), 295pp. short scholarly survey
  • Stevenson, J. and C. Cook, The Slump (2nd ed 2009), focus on politics. excerpt.
  • Taylor, A.J.P. English History, 1914–1945 (Oxford History of England) (1965) excerpt and text search
  • Thompson, F.M.L., ed. The Cambridge Social History of Britain, 1750–1950 (3 vol. 1992), essays by scholars
  • Thorpe, A. Britain in the 1930s (Blackwell 1992)
  • Wrigley, Chris, ed. A Companion to Early Twentieth-Century Britain (Blackwell Companions to British History) (2009) excerpt and text search; 1900-1939.

Gender and family

  • Beddoe, Deirdre. Back to Home and Duty: Women Between the Wars, 1918–1939 (Pandora Press, 1989).
  • Bingham, Adrian. Gender, Modernity, and the Popular Press in Inter-War Britain (Oxford UP, 2004).
  • Cunnington, Cecil Willett. English Women's Clothing in the Present Century (1952).
  • Ferguson, Neal. "Women's Work: Employment Opportunities and Economic Roles, 1918-1939." Albion 7#1 (Spring 1975): 55-68.
  • Ferguson, Neal A. "Women in Twentieth-Century England." in Barbara Kanner, ed., The Women of England from Anglo-Saxon Times to the Present (1979) pp 345-387.
  • Fisher, Karl. Birth Control, Sex, and Marriage in Britain 1918–1960 (2006).
  • Gales, Kathleen E. and Marks, P. H. "Twentieth century trends in the work of women in England and Wales." Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 137#1 (1974): 60-74.
  • Hall, Catherine. "Married Women at Home in Birmingham in the 1920's and 1930's." Oral History 5 (Autumn 1977): 62-83.
  • Lane, Margaret. "Not the boss of one another: a reinterpretation of working-class marriage in England, 1900 to 1970." Cultural and Social History 11.3 (2014): 441-458.
  • Partington, Geoffrey. Women Teachers in the Twentieth Century in England and Wales (1976).
  • Smith, Helen. Masculinity, Class and Same-Sex Desire in Industrial England, 1895-1957 (Springer, 2015).
  • Szreter, Simon, and Kate Fisher. Sex before the sexual revolution: Intimate life in England 1918–1963 (Cambridge UP, 2010).
  • Tebbutt, Melanie. Making Youth: A History of Youth in Modern Britain (Palgrave Macmillan, 2016).
  • Thompson, Derek. "Courtship and Marriage in Preston Between the Wars." Journal of the Oral Historical Society 3 (Autumn 1975): 39-44.
  • Ward, Stephanie. "Drifting into Manhood and Womanhood: Courtship, Marriage and Gender Among Young Adults in South Wales and the North-East of England in the 1930s." The Welsh History Review 26.4 (2013): 623-648.
  • Winter, J. M. "Infant Mortality, Maternal Mortality, and Public Health in Britain in the 1930s." Journal of European Economic History 8 (Fall 1979): 439-462.

Primary sources

  • Medlicott, W. N. ed. Documents on British Foreign Policy, 1919-1939 (HMSO, 1946), primary sources
  • The Times. The History of The Times, Vol. IV, The 150th Anniversary and Beyond 1912-1948, Part I: Chapters I-XII 1912-1920, Part II: Chapters XIII-XXIV (2 vol 1952), Ernest May, says "This is one of the most important works on the period."