Hotchkiss v. Greenwood
From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
| Hotchkiss v. Greenwood | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
| Argued February 5–6, 1851 Decided February 19, 1851 |
|||||
| Full case name | Julia P. Hotchkiss, Executrix of John G. Hotchkiss, Deceased, John A. Davenport, and John W. Quincy, Plaintiffs in Error v. Miles Greenwood and Thomas Wood, Partners in Trade Under the Name of M. Greenwood & Co. | ||||
| Citations | 52 U.S. 248 (more)
13 L. Ed. 683; 1850 U.S. LEXIS 1507; 11 HOW 248
|
||||
| Court membership | |||||
|
|||||
| Case opinions | |||||
| Majority | Nelson, joined by Taney, McLean, Wayne, Catron, McKinley, Daniel, Grier | ||||
| Dissent | Woodbury | ||||
Hotchkiss v. Greenwood, 52 U.S. 248 (1850), was a United States Supreme Court case. It was the first US Supreme Court case to introduce the concept of non-obviousness as patentability requirement in United States patent law.[1][2]
References
<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />
Cite error: Invalid <references> tag; parameter "group" is allowed only.
<references />, or <references group="..." />External links
Works related to Hotchkiss v. Greenwood at Wikisource- Full text opinion from Justia.com
<templatestyles src="Asbox/styles.css"></templatestyles>
|
This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
