Environmental Performance Index
The Environmental Performance Index (EPI) is a method of quantifying and numerically marking the environmental performance of a state's policies. This index was developed from the Pilot Environmental Performance Index, first published in 2002, and designed to supplement the environmental targets set forth in the United Nations Millennium Development Goals.[1]
The EPI was preceded by the Environmental Sustainability Index (ESI), published between 1999 and 2005. Both indexes were developed by Yale University (Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy) and Columbia University (Center for International Earth Science Information Network) in collaboration with the World Economic Forum and the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission. The ESI was developed to evaluate environmental sustainability relative to the paths of other countries. Due to a shift in focus by the teams developing the ESI, the EPI uses outcome-oriented indicators, then working as a benchmark index that can be more easily used by policy makers, environmental scientists, advocates and the general public.[2]
As of January 2012 four EPI reports have been released - the Pilot 2006 Environmental Performance Index,[3] and the 2008, 2010, and 2012 Environmental Performance Index.[4][5] For the 2012 report, a new "Pilot Trend EPI" was developed to rank countries based on the environmental performance changes occurred during the last decade, allowing to establish which countries are improving and which are declining.[6]
In the 2014 EPI ranking, the top five countries were Switzerland, Luxembourg, Australia, Singapore, and the Czech Republic. The bottom five countries in 2014 were Somalia, Mali, Haiti, Lesotho, and Afghanistan. The United Kingdom was ranked in 12th place, Japan 26th place, the United States 33rd, Brazil 77th, China 118th, and India came in 155th.[7] The top five countries based on their 2012 Pilot Trend EPI were Estonia, Kuwait, El Salvador, Namibia and Congo.[8]
Contents
2010 variables
| OBJECTIVE |
|
||
| POLICY CATEGORIES |
|
|
|
| INDICATORS | 1. Environmental Burden of Disease | 2. Adequate Sanitation | 4. Indoor Air Pollution |
| 3. Drinking Water | 5. Urban Particulates | ||
| 6. Local Ozone | |||
| OBJECTIVE |
|
||
| POLICY CATEGORIES |
|
|
|
| INDICATORS | 7. Regional Ozone | 9. Water Quality Index | 11. Conservation Risk Index |
| 8. Sulfur Dioxide Emissions | 10. Water Stress | 12. Effective Conservation | |
| 13. Critical Habitat Protection | |||
| 14. Marine Protected Areas | |||
| POLICY CATEGORIES |
|
|
|
| POLICY SUB-CATEGORY |
|
|
|
| INDICATORS | 15. Growing Stock | 16. Marine Trophic Index | 18. Irrigation Stress |
| 17. Trawling Intensity | 19. Agricultural Subsidies | ||
| 20. Intensive Cropland | |||
| 21. Burnt Land Area | |||
| 22. Pesticide Regulation | |||
| POLICY CATEGORIES |
|
||
| INDICATORS | 23. Emissions per capita | ||
| 24. Emissions per electricity generated | |||
| 25. Industrial carbon intensity |
EPI scores
2014
On 25 January 2014 Yale University and Columbia University released the 2014 Environmental Performance Index at the World Economic Forum ranking 178 countries.[9]
Top 30 countries and score
<templatestyles src="Div col/styles.css"/>
2012
On 25 January 2012 Yale University and Columbia University released the 2012 Environmental Performance Index at the World Economic Forum ranking 132 countries.[5]
Top 30 countries and score[5]
<templatestyles src="Div col/styles.css"/>
|
Top 10 countries by Trend EPI[5][6] The EPI rank is shown in parentheses. |
Worst 10 countries by Trend EPI[5][6] The EPI rank is shown in parentheses.
|
2010
On 28 January 2010 Yale University and Columbia University released the 2010 Environmental Performance Index at the World Economic Forum ranking 163 countries.[4] The top performer for 2010 is Iceland due to its high scores on environmental public health, gets virtually all of its power from renewable sources (hydropower and geothermal energy), and its control of greenhouse gas emissions. The United States fell to the 61st position, as compared to 39th in the 2008 EPI, Brazil ranks 62nd, Russia 69th, China 121st, and India ranks 123rd.[4][10]
Top 30 countries and score[4]
<templatestyles src="Div col/styles.css"/>
2008
On 23 January 2008 Yale University and Columbia University released the 2008 Environmental Performance Index at the World Economic Forum ranking 149 countries. The environmental experts at both universities concluded that "analysis of the drivers underlying the 2008 rankings suggests that wealth is a major determinant of environmental success".[11]
Top 30 countries and score[12]
<templatestyles src="Div col/styles.css"/>
2006
On 26 January 2006 Yale (YCELP) and Columbia University (CIESIN) released the Pilot 2006 Environmental Performance Index at the World Economic Forum ranking 133 countries. It was done in collaboration with the World Economic Forum and the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission.
Top 30 countries and score[13]
<templatestyles src="Div col/styles.css"/>
See also
- Environmental Sustainability Index (ESI)
- Environmental Vulnerability Index (EVI)
- Green Stickered Energy Consumption Indexes
References
<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />
Cite error: Invalid <references> tag; parameter "group" is allowed only.
<references />, or <references group="..." />External links
- Yale University – EPI – A collaboration between Yale and Columbia Universities
- Yale University – YCELP – Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.[dead link]
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. See Executive Summary, pp. 32-35 for a detailed comparison between the ESI 2005, the EPI 2006 and the EPI 2008.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. See also official Press release
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
