Bosstown Sound

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
The advertisement that commenced the Bosstown Sound campaign.

The Bosstown Sound (also known as the Boston Sound) refers to a music scene centered in Boston, Massachusetts, that was engendered by 1960s psychedelic rock and pop musical artists. Its concept was concocted by record producer Alan Lorber as a marketing campaign that, in theory, would establish several underground musical artists native to the city on the national charts, and compete with the popular San Francisco music scene. Lorber chose Boston for his plan because of the city's several developing groups, abundance of music venues such as the Boston Tea Party, and its proximity to the record label that signed the core groups, MGM Records.

The Sound was identified for harnessing the hallucinogenic essense of psychedelia and acid rock. Though numerous groups were involved in the grand scheme of the Bosstown Sound, the bands Ultimate Spinach, Beacon Street Union, and Orpheus spearheaded the movement. At its peak, the music scene did—albeit briefly—capture the interest of the youth culture, and the chart positions of the Billboard 200. However, by the end of 1969, the hype of the campaign was quickly de-escalating, as a consequence of the public's rejection of its overly-marketed advertising. Critics heavily-panned the groups involved, and few of the Bosstown bands survived after the scene's collapse. Over time, opinions are still mixed, but the bands' music has begun to receive more positive assessments.

History

Pre-scene

Prior to the Bosstown Sound, Boston had a burgeoning, garage rock scene which included the Remains, the Rising Storm, Teddy and the Pandas, and the Rockin' Ramrods, among others.[1] The most commercially successful in the area was the proto-punk teen group the Barbarians, who reached the Billboard Hot 100 twice with the singles "Are You a Boy or Are You a Girl" and "Moulty".[2] Much of these bands' heydays pre-dated the Bosstown Sound, and did not have much involvement in the Sound's development—with Teddy and the Pandas' album, Basic Magnetism being a notable exception.[3] The main problem was a lack of viable rock music venues to congregate the groups into a unified music scene. Also missing were the local and region record labels often associated with a developing rock scene.[4] Perhaps more evident in what grew into the Bosstown Sound was the city's equally active folk scene, with key figures like Bob Dylan, Joan Baez, and Mimi Farina. Boston's folk roots later manifested itself in mainstay Bosstown bands Orpheus and Earth Opera.[4][5][6]

What became the genesis of the Bosstown Sound is said to exist, at least in rudimentary form, as early as June 1967, with the first issue of Avatar, a Boston underground newspaper created by Lyman. The newspaper carried an advertisement for the appearance of two of Boston's earliest psychedelic rock bands, Ill Wind and the Hallucinations, at a music venue known as the Boston Tea Party.[7] It symbolized the beginning of the Boston Tea Party serving as the main outlet for local underground psychedelic bands, and other like-minded groups from other cities, including recurring musical acts the Velvet Underground, the Peanut Butter Conspiracy, and Lothar and the Hand People.[8] Journalist Earl Greyland, writing for Boston After Dark, explained the Boston Tea Party's most important period "occurred on March 15, 1968, when, as the staid WBCN audience sat listening to its usual Muzak, the voice of Frank Zappa asked, 'Are you hung up?' and Cream launched into 'I Feel Free'. That was the beginning of the American Revolution, a daily seven-hour program originating from the dressing room of the Tea Party. The combination of providing an established performance setting and radio exposure made the Tea Party a gig second in importance only to the Fillmore".[9] Other psychedelic venues that played a role in creating the underground music scene in Boston include the Psychedelic Supermarket, the Crosstown Bus, the Catacombs, and the Unicorn.[10][11]

"The Sound Heard Around the World"

Record producer Alan Lorber materialized a concept to congregate several progressive Boston bands, and promote them as a new unique music scene, in a similar fashion that lead to the birth of the San Francisco Sound.[12] In his article Bosstown Sound 1968 - The Music and Time, Lorber wrote Boston was a logical epicenter for his marketing plan "since it was a place for new and progressive music forms from the folk days, and had an exceptionally strong initial sales potential in the 250,000 college students in residence in Boston's 250 colleges and universities". Lorber also mentioned that Boston "had a large number of performance clubs where artists could develop before touring nationally. There were many pop music college and commercial radio stations which could expose the new product on a grass-roots level".[13] Based on his past successes with the label, MGM Records agreed to showcase the bands Lorber signed. His core logic to choose the company was its studio location in New York City, which proved to be convenient for managing and transferring several groups.[14]

Another important figure in the Bosstown Sound was Dick Summer, one of Boston's most popular deejays working for WMEX Radio. Summer was directly responsible for the initial radio boom that Bosstown musical acts would experience, and arranged concerts and outdoor festivals in the Boston area where the local bands could hone their skills in anticipation of being signed to a recording deal. It was also Summer who coined the "Bosstown Sound" phrase to create a sense of cohesion among the bands.[13] On January 20, 1968, MGM Records commenced its advertisement campaign for the Bosstown Sound by funding for a patriotic-style ad in Billboard magazine that read: "The Sound Heard Around the World; Boston!!".[1] On the same date, three Boston-based groups known well to the underground scene -- Ultimate Spinach (better known as Underground Cinema prior to the album), Beacon Street Union, and Orpheus had their debut albums released on the MGM label.[15]

The anticipation of the Bosstown Sound's debut to the record-buying public generated a booming market for Boston-based bands. Beacon Street Union's The Eyes of the Beacon Street Union charted at number 75, and Orpheus's album of the same name reached number 119 respectively on the Billboard 200.[16][17][18] Although Orpheus is pegged as a part of the Bosstown Sound, music historian Richie Unterberger notes they were "sentimental pop writers at heart" reminiscent of the Association, rather than the psychedelic bands that comprised much of the Sound. As a result of the group's more commercially accessible sound, Orpheus was among the few Bosstown bands to have a single (the minor 1969 hit "Brown Arms in Houston") chart in the Billboard Hot 100.[19] Emerging from the original three MGM-signed groups, Ultimate Spinach—masterminded by singer-songwriter and multi-instrumentalist Ian Bruce-Douglas—achieved the most comercial success stemming from their debut effort, with Ultimate Spinach peaking at number 35 and selling approximately 110,000 copies in 1968. Despite music critics' general disregard for the album upon release, it has since been recognized as one of the highlights of the Bosstown Sound, both as a psychedelic and acid rock classic.[20]

Following in the trend set by the first three Bosstown groups on their label, MGM Records released other material by local groups such as Chamaeleon Church and Kangeroo.[21][22] Attempting to cash-in on the sudden craze, other major labels like Elektra Records and ABC Records signed their own assortment of bands native to the city.[12] Among them was Eden's Children, which released a Jimi Hendrix-inspired album in 1968 that charted in the Billboard 200 at 196.[23] Apple Pie Motherhood Band released two LPs that deviated from the psychedelic sound, and incorporated bluesy compositions and covers.[24][25] Young teen group, the Freeborne recorded the album Peak Impressions, an ambitious, but somewhat unpredictable, piece that experimented with a variety of instruments.[26] Another group known as Listening recorded a self-titled album in late-1968, which encompassed performances by former Velvet Underground bassist Walter Powers and guitarist Peter Malick.[27] Several additional groups were also associated with the scene such as Earth Opera, Tangerine Zoo, the Art of Lovin', and Ill Wind.[28][29][30]

Decline and reception

Almost immediately following the success of the Bosstown Sound campaign, music critics began to home in on the apparent lack of originality of some of the bands. Another issue discussed was the diversity among Boston's musical artists, which brought to question whether there was an actual effort to create a unified scene or a manufactured attempt to cash in on the popularity of psychedelia.[31] Music journalist Paul Williams, writing for Crawdaddy!, spoke on the concern: "[T]here isn't any common consciousness in the Boston rock scene -- there isn't even any Boston rock scene. There are good groups coming out of that area but there isn't the spiritual unity that San Francisco had".[32] A Jazz & Pop article remarked that "the sound doesn't exist except in the head of Alan Lorber".[33] The newly established Rolling Stone magazine questioned "whether or not there is anything lying beneath the hype", before describing the Boston groups as pretentious and boring.[13] Some articles, such as one in Newsweek, attempted to defend the scene, saying a sense of unity was found in "subdued, artful electronic sound, an insistence on clear, understandable lyrics, the spice of dissonance and the infusion of classical textures".[34]

By early 1969, nearly all the Bosstown groups had either disbanded or disappeared from the public view as a consequence of media and youth culture backlash. Ultimate Spinach barely managed to chart at number 198 with their album Behold & See, which noticeably lacked the organ-driven instrumentals that were featured on their debut.[35] Following Bruce-Douglas's departure from the band, Ultimate Spinach released one final, but directionless, album in 1969 with a completely reconstructed lineup.[36] The Beacon Street Union's The Clown Died in Marvin Gardens was plagued by the Sound's negative stigma, and only reached number 175.[37] Orpheus was among the few groups to remain active into the 1970s, and has since conducted reunions in the 1980s and, again, in the 2000s.[38]

In the aftermath of the Bosstown Sound, reviews remain mixed, but critics have begun to describe the scene in a better light. In 1988, Rolling Stone magazine, while reevaluating the Sound, conceded it was perhaps "easier to put down Ultimate Spinach and the other Boston groups than it had been to like them".[13] Music critic Steve Nelson notes that after "the hype died down, Boston in fact turned out to be a great incubator of musical talent, producing acts like J. Geils, Aerosmith, and The Cars".[12] While interviewing Bruce-Douglas in 2001, critic Gary Burns stated Ultimate Spinach, which received the brunt of the media assault on Bosstown, "deserved a much better fate. The Bosstown hype was not their idea, and their records are some of the best psychedelic music available then or now. Their brief time in the spotlight brought them not well-earned glory but unexpected trauma, which fractured an already-fragile band".[39] Others, like Richie Unterberger, dismissed the bands' work as "poor third cousins to the West Coast psychedelic groups that served as their obvious inspirations".[36]

In 1996, Big Beat Records released the compilation album Bosstown Sound, 1968: The Music & the Time, which included an assortment of Bosstown and pre-scene bands.[40] In 2001, Best of the Bosstown Sound followed with a more condensed track listing.[41]

Associated acts

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  8. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  10. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  11. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  14. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  15. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  16. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  17. 17.0 17.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  18. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  19. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  20. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  21. 21.0 21.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  22. 22.0 22.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  23. 23.0 23.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  24. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  25. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  26. 26.0 26.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  27. 27.0 27.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  28. 28.0 28.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  29. 29.0 29.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  30. 30.0 30.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  31. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  32. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  33. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  34. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  35. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  36. 36.0 36.1 36.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  37. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  38. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  39. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  40. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  41. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  42. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  43. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  44. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  45. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  46. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  47. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  48. 48.0 48.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  49. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  50. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.