2006 Yogyakarta earthquake

2006 Yogyakarta earthquake

Jakarta Pangandaran Yogyakarta
Date	27 May 2006 (2006-05-27)
Origin time	05:54 local time
Magnitude	6.4 Mw
Depth	15 km (9 mi)
Epicenter
Type	Strike-slip
Areas affected	Yogyakarta Special Region Java, Indonesia
Total damage	Rp 29.1 Trillion ($3.1B)
Max. intensity	IX (Destructive)
Peak acceleration	.336g
Casualties	> 5,700 dead > 37,000 injured

The 2006 Yogyakarta earthquake (also known as the Bantul earthquake) occurred at 05:54 local time on 27 May with a moment magnitude of 6.4 and a maximum intensity of IX (Destructive) on the Medvedev–Sponheuer–Karnik scale. The shock occurred on the southern coast of Java near the Indonesian city of Yogyakarta, and caused a disproportionate number of casualties, with more than 5,700 deaths and 37,000 injuries, and financial losses of (Rp 29.1 Trillion ($3.1B)). The eruption of Mount Merapi, a stratovolcano that was entering a period of unrest, was originally thought to have a connection with the earthquake. With a lack of instruments in the area, the shock was initially attributed with the Opak Fault that lies to the east of the affected areas, but later InSAR analysis revealed that another previously unknown fracture was responsible for the sequence of shocks.

Tectonic setting

See also: Geology of Indonesia and Sunda Arc

The islands of Indonesia constitute an island arc that is one of the world's most seismically active regions, with high velocity (up to 60 mm (2.4 in) per year) plate movement at the Sunda Trench, and considerable volcanic activity throughout. The south central portion of the island of Java (one of the five largest in the Indonesian archipelago) had been affected by an eruption of Mount Merapi that began prior to the May 27 earthquake, but the Special Region of Yogyakarta has experienced numerous other eruptions, earthquakes, and tsunamis, including the Pangandaran earthquake and tsunami that occurred just two months later. Java lies on the Sunda Shelf (and the Sunda microplate) to the north of the Sunda Trench, which is a convergent plate boundary where the Indo-Australian Plate is being subducted under the Eurasian Plate. The subduction zone is characterized by frequent earthquakes and a large number of active volcanoes that influence the regional geography, and due to direct or indirect stress transfer, the offshore plate movement has affected the various onshore faults that are closer to the Special Region of Yogyakarta.

Earthquake

File:USGS Shakemap - 2006 Yogyakarta earthquake.jpg

USGS ShakeMap for the mainshock

According to the United States Geological Survey (USGS), the shock occurred 20 km (12 mi) south-southeast of Yogyakarta at a depth of 10 km (6.2 mi), but other institutions provided source parameters (location and depth) that were not in agreement. No information was present on the extent of the faulting or the direction of propagation, but the shock was unlikely to be related to the eruption of Mount Merapi. The USGS suggested that the focal mechanism was most likely associated with left-lateral slip on a NE–SW trending strike-slip fault, as that is the orientation of the Opak Fault, but this has not been validated. No surface breaks were documented, but the location of the greatest damage that was caused does align with the Opak Fault as a possible source.

A group of Japanese and Indonesian scientists visited the area in March 2007 and confirmed the lack of surface ruptures, and pointed out that any visible expression of the fault would likely have been rapidly destroyed due to the tropical climate, and have acknowledged the widely varying locations (and the preference for the Opak Fault) that were reported by the various seismological institutions. Their investigation resulted in a different scenario, with an unknown or newly formed NE–SW trending fault as the origin of the shock. Evidence for one of the proposed faults was found in the form of alignment of portions of the Oyo River near the USGS' epicenter, which is parallel (N°65E) to the Nglipar fault in the southern mountains region. If the shock occurred in this area it could indicate the reactivation of a major fault system. The second proposed fault further to the east is nearly parallel to the Nfalang and Kembang faults that lie to the north of the Oyo River.

InSAR analysis

Further information: Remote sensing

While the densely populated area that saw significant destruction is adjacent to the Opak River Fault, both the USGS and Harvard University placed the epicenter to the east of that fault. Few seismometers were operating in the region, but a group of temporary units that were set up following the mainshock recorded a number of aftershocks that were east of the Opak River Fault and were aligned along a 20 km (12 mi) zone striking N°50E. Due to the ambiguous nature of the available information on the source of the Yogyakarta earthquake, a separate group of Japanese and Indonesian scientists applied one of the first uses of Interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) to determine the source fault. Several data sets (one captured in April 2006 and another post-earthquake batch from June) were collected from an instrument on board the Advanced Land Observation Satellite and were compared to each other to show potential ground deformation patterns.

Unrest at Mount Merapi in June 2006

A lack of any dislocation found on the images along the Opak River fault made evident the lack of movement along that fault, and though the aftershocks were occurring at a depth of 8–15 km (5.0–9.3 mi), the deformation was distinct at the surface. The observed ground deformation that was detailed by the differential satellite images and Global Positioning System measurements was roughly 10 km (6.2 mi) east of (and parallel to) the Opak River Fault, along a zone that passed through the USGS' epicenter, and delineated a fault with a strike of N48°E and a dip of 89°. The displacements were not more than 10 cm (3.9 in) and indicated left-lateral strike-slip motion as well as a component of reverse slip, and to the west of the Opak River Fault (and closer to the areas of damage) strong ground motion triggered subsidence of volcanic deposits from Mount Merapi.

Strong motion

In 2006, Mount Merapi had not been active for more than four years, but on May 11 a pyroclastic flow triggered the evacuation of more than 20,000 people from the northern sector of Yogyakarta. While authorities expected a larger eruption to follow, the earthquake occurred instead. The volcano's previous eruptions deposited loosely bound sedimentary material in the valley during lahar flows. Following the mainshock, German and Indonesian scientists set up instruments at several locations situated on different soil types to measure aftershocks. Of nine events that were analyzed, it was found that the station at Imogiri (a heavily affected village that was built on 150–200 meters (490–660 ft) of sediment) showed signs of local amplification when compared to a location that was built on bedrock, and that the deposits amplified the impact of the earthquake.

Response

Patients being treated at a hospital in Yogyakarta.

Although Tsunami warnings were issued in the early aftermath of the earthquake, the earthquake did not cause any tsunami activity.

Political

President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono moved the army to the central Java province to aid rescue efforts and the evacuation of victims. A team of Cabinet Ministers was also sent to oversee the operations.

International aid

Many countries and organizations offered foreign aid to the devastated region, but the actual amounts delivered/received often varied from these figures, as in the case of other disasters.

• Japan promised US$10 million, sent two medical teams and also announced that it will send troops to help out
• The United Kingdom offered four million pounds (US$7,436,800)
• Saudi Arabia promised US$5 million, plus food, medical equipment and tents, while the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait each pledged US$4 million
• The European Union offered three million euros (US$3,800,000)
• The United States offered $5 million; US military joins relief effort
• Australia offered 7.5 million Australian dollars (US$5,675,000) in aid relief, including 27 member medical team among over 80 personnel
• China offered $2 million U.S dollars
• Canada offered two million Canadian dollars (US$1.8 million)
• India put forward an aid package worth $2 million.
• The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormons) donated US$1.6 million worth of emergency supplies to devastated areas, teaming up with Islamic Relief Worldwide who provided the transportation. In addition, local Indonesian LDS members prepared thousands of meals, hygiene kits, cots, mattresses, and blankets for those requiring medical attention.

File:Prambanan Damage.jpg

A fallen pinnacle from the damaged Prambanan temple

• The Netherlands promised 1 million euros in May plus an extra 10 million euros one month later, Belgium has pledged $832,000, while Norway, France and Italy have offered either medical teams or relief supplies
• The Red Cross, Red Crescent, OXFAM, Plan International, Jesuit Refugee Service alongside other NGOs and UN agencies, including WFP and UNICEF, provided plastic sheeting, tools and building materials, and cash assistance to the victims. Japan and Malaysia are to send medical teams to the affected region
• Singapore offered humanitarian relief assistance in the form of a 35-member Armed Forces Medical Team, a 43-member Civil Defense Force Disaster Assistance and Rescue Team, as well as US$50,000 worth of emergency supplies
• The United Nations World Health Organization sent medicines and communications equipment, enough emergency health kits to last 50,000 people three months, and surgical kits for as many as 600 operations
• Vietnam offered 1,000 tons of rice to Indonesia.

• The Isle of Man offered £30,000 (US$56,291) to Indonesia

• King Abdullah II of Jordan ordered to dispatch a plane laden with humanitarian relief to alleviate the suffering of Indonesian earthquake victims that hit Java. The aid included blankets, medicines and other medical equipment.
• MERCY Malaysia sent 6 Missions to Yogya the first being sent on the 28th of May 2006. Datuk Dr. Jemilah Mahmood, President of MERCY Malaysia (Mission Leader) and Saiful Nazri, Programme Officer from MERCY Aceh Office went there on the first mission travelling by a special United Nations Humanitarian Air Services (UNHAS) flight from Banda Aceh along with other international organisations based in Aceh and two (2) tonnes of medical supplies contributed by the international agencies from Aceh. The first team had secured ground logistics for the subsequent teams coming in from Kuala Lumpur.

Media

Most international wire services had already had reporters or 'stringers' in the area due to the Mount Merapi eruption to the north of Yogyakarta.

Yogyakarta for many is associated with Borobudur and Prambanan, even though both locations are some distance away from the town. As a result, news stories tend to emphasize the condition of those places. Borobudur suffered no damage whereas Prambanan, which is much closer to the epicentre, has according to reports, suffered significant damage.

The reporting of the immensity of the problems that were evolving following the earthquake also competed with the crisis in East Timor (Timor Leste) in the media of some countries like Australia and New Zealand.

Reconstruction

The earthquake's shallow depth was a major factor, but the scale of the damage was made worse by failure to meet safe building standards and employ basic earthquake-resistant construction methods, according to FuturArc. Most homes in the area were built with low-quality materials without structural frames and reinforcing pillars. Many deaths and injuries occurred when buildings and walls collapsed.

The government was slow to implement assistance in reconstructing private houses, leading many homeowners to repair or rebuild their homes either by themselves or with community help. Reconstruction in some areas was aided by relief agencies, like the Red Cross Red Crescent.

Villagers rebuilt their homes with extremely limited resources, using simple affordable materials. They turned to traditional materials, such as bamboo, because of the damage inflicted by collapsing brick walls.

See also

• Bantul
• Sidoarjo mud flow

References

Sources

External links

• M6.3 - Java, Indonesia – United States Geological Survey
• Indonesia earthquake – CNN Special Report
• An ancient wonder reduced to rubble – The Sydney Morning Herald
• UN health agency rushes aid to quake-struck parts of Indonesia – United Nations
• The Mw 6.3 Java, Indonesia, Earthquake of May 27, 2006 – Earthquake Engineering Research Institute