Youth Training Scheme

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

The Youth Training Scheme (YTS) was the former name in the United Kingdom of an on-the-job training course for school leavers aged 16 and 17, managed by the Manpower Services Commission. The scheme was first outlined in the 1980 whitepaper A New Training Initiative: A Programme for Action, and was brought into operation in 1983, replacing the Youth Opportunities Programme, by the government of Margaret Thatcher. Initially lasting one year, the scheme was amended in 1986 to be extendable to a second year. The 1981 England riots encouraged this by bringing into sharp focus the results of leaving large numbers of unskilled unemployed to find their own solutions.

The Youth Training Scheme promised training to its applicants and made use of a variety of different training locales such as businesses, colleges of further education or training workshops run by voluntary organisations. Since the training place was guaranteed by the government, and that trainees were to be paid whilst on the course, eligibility for social security unemployment benefit was withdrawn.

Accredited organisations were required to provide at least 13 weeks per year of training away from the job and include life-skills and social skills. A standardised form of certification was issued at the end of the training period.

In 1989 the YTS was renamed Youth Training and was placed under the management of local Training and Enterprise Councils. The trainees on the schemes could be classified as either trainee status or employed status. The difference was distinguished by whether the trainee was recruited by an employer and provided with training for the company needs or if the trainee was being trained by a training organisation using employers as training placements. Often employed status trainees would have their training allowance improved by the employer.

Criticism

The YTS attracted political and social criticism from an early point. Critics claimed that the scheme enabled employers to exploit school leavers for cheap labour, and provided little substance in the way of genuine education. The government's line was that the scheme was an effective counter to the drop in apprenticeships and marked rise in youth unemployment seen in the early 1980s.

References


<templatestyles src="Asbox/styles.css"></templatestyles>