Divje Babe Flute

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
(Redirected from Divje Babe flute)
Jump to: navigation, search
Divje Babe Flute
Flûte paléolithique (musée national de Slovénie, Ljubljana) (9420310527).jpg
The artefact as displayed in the museum
Material Bone
Created Late Pleistocene (43100 ± 700 BP)
Discovered 1995 near Cerkno, Slovenia
Present location National Museum of Slovenia, Ljubljana

The Divje Babe Flute is a cave bear femur pierced by spaced holes that was found in 1995 at the Divje Babe archeological park located near Cerkno in northwestern Slovenia. It has been suggested that it was made by Neanderthals as a form of musical instrument, its hole spacing and alignment leading to its being labeled a "Neanderthal flute". Slovenian archeologist Mitja Brodar, however, argues that it was made by Cro-Magnons as an element of Central European Aurignacian culture.[1]

If it is a form of flute, it is possibly the world's oldest known musical instrument.[2] Alternative hypotheses notwithstanding,[3][4][5] the artifact remains on prominent public display as a flute in the National Museum of Slovenia (Narodni Muzej Slovenije) in Ljubljana. The museum's visitor leaflet maintains that manufacture by Neanderthals "is reliably proven".[6]

Site and similar findings in Slovenia

Excavation in cave Divje Babe I

Divje Babe is the oldest known archaeological site in Slovenia. The site is the location of a horizontal cave, 45 metres (148 ft) long and up to 15 metres (49 ft) wide. It is located 230m above the Idrijca River, near Cerkno, and is accessible to visitors. Researchers working at this site have uncovered more than 600 archaeological finds in at least ten levels, including 20 hearths[7] and the skeletal remains of cave bears, and have studied climate change during the pleistocene.[8] According to the museum, the presumed flute has been associated with the "end of the middle Pleistocene" and the time of Neanderthals, about 55,000 years ago.[6]

This is not the only such site in Slovenia. In the 1920s and 1930s, the archeologist Srečko Brodar discovered tens of bones with holes in another site, Potok Cave (Slovene: Potočka zijalka) in the Eastern Karavanke, but almost all of them were destroyed during Italian occupation of Ljubljana in World War II. The best known of them, still preserved, is a mandible of a cave bear with three holes in the mandibular canal.

Potok Cave, a cave in the Eastern Karavanke, where the remains of a human residence, dated to the Aurignacian (40,000 to 30,000 BP), including a bone flute, were found by Srečko Brodar in the 1920s and 1930s. This marks the beginning of Paleolithic research in Slovenia.[9]

Since World War II, specimens have also been found in Mokrica Cave (Slovene: Mokriška jama), Betal Rock Shelter (Betalov spodmol), and elsewhere. These bones are preserved today at the National History Museum of Slovenia in Ljubljana, the capital. According to the archeologist who discovered many of them, Mitja Brodar, bones with holes were never found in the Western Europe, and they have been dated only to the end of the Mousterian and the beginning of the Aurignacian. Such bones were discovered also elsewhere in Central Europe, but in a much lower number, and it is unlikely that cave bears would make such holes only in Central Europe and only in a specific period. That these bones are still not recognised by international research community Mitja Brodar attributes to the fact that most of the bones were found on the territory of France and the Paleolithic is still considered to be the French domain, although not a single bone with holes have been found there. The only bone point with a hole ever discovered was found in Potok Cave. According to Brodar, such holes are an element of Central European Aurignacian.[1] They have been ascribed to the Cro-Magnon, modern human.[10] According to Brodar, the Divje Babe Flute is a product of modern humans as well, but this has been disputed by other Slovene scholars.[1]

"Neanderthal flute"

In 1995, Ivan Turk found an approximately 43,100-year-old[11] [12] juvenile cave bear femur at the Divje Babe site, near a Mousterian hearth. Because it has characteristics of a flute, he has called it a "Neanderthal flute".[7] Whether it is actually a flute created by Neanderthals is a subject of debate. It is broken at both ends, and has two complete holes and what may be the incomplete remains of one hole on each end, meaning that the bone may have had four or more holes before being damaged. The bone fragment is the diaphysis of the left femur of a one- to two-year-old cave bear, and is 113.6 mm long. The maximum diameters of the two complete holes are 9.7 and 9.0 mm. The distance between the centers of the holes is 35 mm.[13]

If the bone is a flute, it would be evidence of the existence of music 43,000 years ago.[14][15] Thus Ivan Turk has asserted that whether the holes are of "artificial" (made by man) or "natural" (punctures from a carnivore bite) origin is the "crucial question."[7]

The bone has become a noted attraction in the National Museum of Slovenia, publicized on official Slovenian websites[16] aired on TV with tunes played on a clay replica[17] and is a source of pride for the country. In the West, paintings were made, models constructed, and musicians such as biology professor and flautist Jelle Atema[18] have played them publicly.

French-based Italian taphonomist Francesco D'Errico (et al., 1998), Holderman and Serangeli (1999), as well as Chase and Nowell (1998, 552) hypothesized its carnivore origin.[19]

Hole spacing and alignment

The probability that four randomly placed holes would appear in line in a recognizable musical scale is on the order of a few in several million, according to an analysis made in 2000 by Canadian musicologist Bob Fink.[20] Responding to the D'Errico et al.'s carnivore-origin hypothesis, Turk (2005, 2006) pointed out that the features "common" between the carnivore-origin artifact and other chewed bones studied by D'Errico (see "Hole shape" below) do not include the alignment of the holes.

There is also no evidence that the two holes could have been bitten at the same time. The tooth spans were analyzed by all taphonomists concerned to see if any animals could bite two or more such holes at once. No match could be found to any known animals. If a match had been found, it could have been cited as prima facie evidence that the holes were animal-made. This was noted by Turk, et al. in his monograph, and was also noted from the opposing hypothesis holders Nowell and Chase in their article in the August–October 1998 issue of Current Anthropology. "Holes in the specimen," wrote Nowell, et al., "were almost certainly made sequentially rather than simultaneously and that the distance between them has nothing to do with the distance between any two teeth in a wolf's jaw."[21]

Iain Morley, despite his holding the carnivore-origin hypothesis, in an additional observation to his November 2006 article observed that "[W]hilst the collections of cave bear bones examined by D'Errico et al. (1998), as well as those discussed by Turk et al. (2001), do show similar shaped and damaged holes...none of these occur in the diaphysis of a femur", as is found on the reputed flute.[22]

Marcel Otte (director of the Museum of Prehistoire, Universite de Liege, Belgium) pointed out in a Current Anthropology (April 2000) article that there is a possible thumb-hole on the opposite side of the Divje Babe bone, which, making five holes, would perfectly fit a human hand.

Turk wrote in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology book The Origins of Music: "If this probability [of having lined-up holes looking like a flute] were greater (and of course it isn't), it is likely that there would have been more such finds, since...carnivores in cave dens were at least as active on bones, if not more so, than people in cave dwellings....".

Hole shape

D'Errico et al. made an analysis of the artifact in comparison to cave-bear bone accumulations where no hominid presence was known.[3] They published photos of several bones with holes in them which had more-or-less circular holes similar to those found in the artifact, but they did not have a single bone coming even close to the linear alignment of Turk's holes. Ignoring the probability of the alignment of the holes, D'Errico et al.'s interpretation was that it was possible for the holes to have been made by an animal, and they concluded that of the available options this was the most likely. D'Errico insisted on ignoring the probability of the alignment of the holes and, even after having analyzed the artifact firsthand, claimed that "the presence of two or possibly three perforations on the suggested flute cannot therefore be considered as evidence of human manufacture, as this is a common feature in the studied sample."[23]

Turk conducted laboratory experiments which pierced holes in fresh bear bones in the manner of carnivore punctures, and in every case, the bones split. Yet in the Divje Babe instance, the bone did not break, a fact not matching expectations of carnivore action, as Turk's results showed. Turk wrote, in his monograph and in his article in MIT's Origins of Music anthology, the bone shows no "counter-bites" that one would normally expect on the other side of the bone matching the immense pressure necessary for a bite to make the center holes.

Turk's 1997 monograph reported that the holes have similar diameters which would accommodate fingertips, and all are circular instead of oval (as carnivore bites often are). Furthermore, all are in the proper ratio of bore size to hole size found in most flutes, and the bone is the kind (femur) usually used for bone flutes.

An examination of the specimen using computed tomography was published in 2005 by Ivan Turk et al., in which he concluded that "the two partially preserved holes were formerly created before the damage...or before the indisputable intervention of a carnivore."

The National Museum of Slovenia argues that this evidence has "finally refuted hypotheses that the bone was perforated because of a bear bite". The manufacture by Neanderthals "is reliably proven" and its significance in the understanding of their capabilities and the development of music and speech is secure.[6]

Bone marrow

The issue of how much bone marrow remains in the artifact is important, because the making of flutes from bone usually includes removing the marrow.

Turk, et al. (in the monograph Moussterian Bone Flute, p. 160) wrote that "the marrow cavity is basically cleaned of spongiose. The colour of the marrow cavity does not differ from the colour of the external surface of the bone. So we may conclude that the marrow cavity was already open at the time.... Otherwise, it would be a darker colour than the surface of the bone, as we know from coloured marrow cavities of whole limb bones."

April Nowell stated in an interview that "at Turk's invitation, [Nowell] and Chase went to Slovenia last year... They came away even more skeptical that the bear bone had ever emitted music. For one thing, both ends had clearly been gnawed away by something, perhaps a wolf, seeking greasy marrow. The holes could have simply been perforated in the process by pointed canine or carnassial teeth, and their roundness could be due to natural damage after the bone was abandoned. The presence of marrow suggests that no one had bothered to hollow out the bone as if to create an end-blown flute. Says Nowell, '[Turk's] willing to give it the benefit of the doubt, whereas we're not.' "[24]

Diatonic scale

Illustration of the diatonic flute by Bob Fink.

Bob Fink claimed in his essay[25] in 1997, that the bone's holes were "consistent with four notes of the diatonic scale" (do, re, mi, fa) based on the spacing of those four holes. The spacing of the holes on a modern diatonic flute (minor scale) are unique, and not evenly spaced. In essence, Fink said, they are like a simple fingerprint. The Divje Babe bone's holes matched those spacings very closely to a series of note-holes in a minor scale.

Nowell and Chase wrote in Studies In Music Archaeology III that the juvenile bear bone was too short to play those four holes in tune to any diatonic series of tones and half-tones.[24] (Fink had suggested there may have originally been a mouthpiece extension added to the bone before it was broken.)

[Nowell] along with archeologist Philip Chase, had serious doubts as soon as they saw photos of the bone on the Internet.... The Divje Babe bone bears some resemblance to the dozens of younger, uncontested bone flutes from European Upper Paleolithic [UP] sites. But, says Nowell, these obvious flutes are longer, have more holes, and exhibit telltale tool marks left from their manufacture. No such marks occur on the bear bone. Fink proposed that the spacing of the flute's holes matches music's standard diatonic scale. ...Nowell and Chase teamed with a more musically inclined colleague to show that the bear bone would need to be twice its natural total length to conform to a diatonic scale...[24]

In a 2011 article Matija Turk published the results of a collaboration with Ljuben Dimkaroski, an academic musician who had made replicas of the artifact. The authors argue that the instrument encompassed a range of two and a half octaves, which can be extended to three octaves by overblowing.[26] Dimkaroski created over 30 wooden and bone replicas of the flute and experimented with them. The replicas were made from femurs of juvenile brown bears provided by the Hunters Association of Slovenia, but also calf, goat, pig, roe and red deer bones. In the end he concentrated on playing a replica made on a femur of a juvenile cave bear from Divje babe I, to come as close as possible to the dimensions of the original.

See also

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. 3.0 3.1 D'Errico 1998
  4. Holderman and Serangeli 1999
  5. Chase and Nowell 1998, 2003
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 The flute from Divje Babe, National Museum of Slovenia, 2005
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 Turk, 2003
  8. Yu 2001
  9. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  10. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  11. Nelson, D.E., Radiocarbon dating of bone and charcoal from Divje babe I cave, cited by Morley, p. 47
  12. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  13. Kunej and Turk, cited by Morley, p. 47
  14. Chase and Nowell, 2002–2003
  15. "Neanderthal Man Moves Up the Evolutionary Scale" Times (London), April 5, 1997.
  16. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  17. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  18. http://sciencenetlinks.org/sci_update.cfm?DocID=37[dead link]
  19. D'Errico, et al., 2003
  20. source, reproduced at here Archived May 27, 2006 at the Wayback Machine;[self-published source?] (Fink 2000)
  21. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  22. (Morley 2006, 329)
  23. Journal of World Pre-history pp. 36–39, Vol 17, #1, March 2003.
  24. 24.0 24.1 24.2 Edgar 1998
  25. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  26. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Sources

  • Brodar, Mitja. 2009. Stara kamena doba v Sloveniji = Altsteinzeit in Slowenien. Ljubljana, samozalozba.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Fink, Bob, 2002-3, "The Neanderthal flute and origin of the scale: fang or flint? A response," in: Ellen Hickmann, Anne Draffkorn Kilmer and Ricardo Eichmann (Eds.), Studies in Music Archaeology III, Verlag Marie Leidorf GmbH., Rahden/Westf. Germany, pp 83–87. Probability analysis.
  • Holdermann, Claus-Stephan, and Jordi Serangeli. 1999. "Die 'Neanderthalerflöte' von Divje-Babe: Eine Revolution in der Musikgeschichte?" Musica instrumentalis: Zeitschrift für Organologie 2:147–57.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Turk, Ivan, Miran Pflaum, and Dean Pekarovič. 2005. "Rezultati računalniške tomografije najstarejše domnevne piščali iz Divjih bab I (Slovenija): prispevek k teoriji luknjanja kosti", "Results of Computer Tomography of the Oldest Suspected Flute from Divje Babe I (Slovenia): Contribution to the Theory of Making Holes in Bones" (English & Slovenian). Arheološki vestnik: Acta archaeologica—Ljubljana : Slovenska Akademija Znanosti in Umetnosti, Sekcija za arheologijo 56:9-36. (2005 version contains tomography slice photos & analysis)
  • Turk, Matija and Dimkaroski, Ljuben. 2011. "Neandertalska piščal iz Divjih bab I: stara in nova spoznanja", "Neanderthal Flute from Divje babe I: Old and New Findings" (English & Slovenian). Opera Instituti Archaeologici Sloveniae : Založba ZRC SAZU, Ljubljana 21:251-265.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Wallin, Nils, Björn Merker, and Steven Brown, eds. 2000. The Origins of Music. Proceedings of the First Florentine Workshop in Biomusicology, Fiesole, 1997. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-23206-5.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Further reading

  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. [1]
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.