Broadrick v. Oklahoma
From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Broadrick v. Oklahoma | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
|||||
Argued Monday March 26, 1973 Decided Monday June 25, 1973 |
|||||
Full case name | Broadrick v. Oklahoma | ||||
Citations | 413 U.S. 601 (more) | ||||
Prior history | Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma | ||||
Holding | |||||
The Oklahoma statute is not overly broad; the State of Oklahoma has the power to regulate partisan political activities | |||||
Court membership | |||||
|
|||||
Case opinions | |||||
Majority | White, joined by Burger, Blackmum, Powell, Rehnquist | ||||
Dissent | Brennan, joined by Stewart, Marshall | ||||
Dissent | Douglas | ||||
Laws applied | |||||
First Amendment to the United States Constitution |
Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601 (1973) is a United States Supreme Court decision upholding an Oklahoma statute which prohibited state employees from engaging in partisan political activities. Broadrick is often cited to enunciate the test for a facial overbreadth challenge, that "the overbreadth of a statute must not only be real, but substantial as well, judged in relation to the statute's plainly legitimate sweep."
External links
<templatestyles src="Asbox/styles.css"></templatestyles>