Spongiophyton
Spongiophyton |
|
---|---|
Scientific classification | |
Kingdom: | Plantae |
Phylum: | incertae sedis |
Family: | †Spongiophytaceae |
Genus: | †Spongiophyton Kräusel, 1954 |
Species | |
|
Lua error in Module:Taxonbar/candidate at line 22: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
Spongiophyton was a thallose fossil of the early to mid Devonian, which is notoriously difficult to classify.
Spongiophyton displayed dichotomous branching, and a flattened/elliptical cross section with a thick (20–80 μm) upper cuticular surface.[2] It is also perforated with pores resembling those of some liverworts.[2] It probably grew on the banks of rivers.[3] Spongiophyton has been mistakenly interpreted as tree resin[4] and lycopod cuticle,[5] and was later identified as the cuticle of a thalloid plant.[6] It has most recently been interpreted on morphological[7] and isotopic[8] grounds as a lichen - which would make it the earliest known representative of this group.[9]
The significance of the isotopic data has, however, been called into question. Jahren et al. argued that mosses and liverworts had a δ13C signature of under −26‰, and lichens were exclusively > −26‰. But in deducing this they relied solely on their own data, neglecting to include published datasets or bryophytes from a wide range of habitats. They also failed to take into account any adjustment necessary to overcome post-burial alteration of the δ13C, or to compensate for the different isotopic composition of the early Devonian atmosphere.[2] Repeating Jahren's experiments with these factors taken into account shows that most major groups' δ13C values overlap significantly, and do not provide a statistically significant case for the inclusion of Spongiophyton in any group.[2]
Notes
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Fletcher (2004)
- ↑ Gensel et al.. 1991; Griffing et al. 2000; in Fletcher (2004)
- ↑ Penhallow (1889) in Fletcher (2004)
- ↑ Barbosa (1949) in Fletcher (2004)
- ↑ Kräusel (1954) in Fletcher (2004)
- ↑ Taylor et al. (2004)
- ↑ Jahren et al. (2003)
- ↑ Retallack (1994) suggested that the Ediacaran biota were lichens, but has since refined this hypothesis (Retallack, 2007).
References
- Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.