Pholidosaurus

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
Pholidosaurus
Temporal range: Early Cretaceous
250px
Pholidosaurus meyeri skull fossil at the Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin
Scientific classification e
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Reptilia
Superorder: Crocodylomorpha
Family: Pholidosauridae
Genus: †Pholidosaurus
Meyer, 1841
Species
  • <templatestyles src="Noitalic/styles.css"/>P. schaumburgensis Meyer, 1841 (type)
  • <templatestyles src="Noitalic/styles.css"/>P. meyeri Lydekker, 1887
  • <templatestyles src="Noitalic/styles.css"/>P. purbeckensis Salisbury, 2002
Synonyms
  • Macrorhynchus Dunker, 1844
  • Petrosuchus Owen, 1878

Lua error in Module:Taxonbar/candidate at line 22: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).

Pholidosaurus is an extinct genus of neosuchian crocodylomorph. It is the type genus of the family Pholidosauridae. Fossils have been found from Germany and England. The genus is known to have existed during the Berriasian stage of the Early Cretaceous. Fossil material found from the Annero and Jydegård Formations in Skåne, Sweden and on the island of Bornholm, Denmark, have been referred to as a mesoeucrocodylian, and possibly represent the genus Pholidosaurus.[1]

Description

An early description of the genus by Lydekker (1888) mentioned that the orbit is slightly smaller than the supratemporal fossa, the nasals reach the premaxillae, and the vomer appears on the palate.[2] It is similar in appearance to and about as large as the modern gharial.

Species

File:Petrosuchus.jpg
Illustration of BMNH 28432 and BMNH 41099, referred to Petrosuchus laevidens by Richard Owen

The type species of Pholidosaurus is P. schaumburgensis, named in 1841 from the Wealden, or Hastings Sand, of Bückeburg, Germany.[2][3] P. schaumburgensis was named on the basis of a natural mould of part of a thorax discovered in around 1830 from the Berriasian Obernkirchen Sandstone.[4] This mould is known as IMGPGö 741-1. The individual that the mould belonged to is thought to have been around 25 centimetres (9.8 in) in length.[5]

Macrorhynchus is a junior synonym of Pholidosaurus.[6] It was named in 1843 from the Wealden Group in southern England, with the type species being M. meyeri.[7] Because M. meyeri bears a strong resemblance to Pholidosaurus schaumburgensis, it is now regarded as a species of Pholidosaurus. It was reassigned to the genus Pholidosaurus in 1887 by Richard Lydekker because of this synonymy, and also because the name Macrorhynchus was preoccupied by a genus of fish named in 1880.[3] P. meyeri differs from P. schaumburgensis in that the bar separating the supratemporal fenestrae is rounded, while in the type species it is rounded.[2]

Several species of Pholidosaurus have been named in the past, but are no longer considered valid. These include P. decipiens and P. laevis. P. decipiens was constructed to describe a partial cranium, BMNH 28432, that was originally assigned to the new genus and species Petrosuchus laevidens by Richard Owen in 1878.[8] Petrosuchus laevidens was based on this cranium and a mandibular ramus called BMNH 41099, both of which were collected from Swanage, England. A later study in 1911 concluded that the material belonged to two different species. BMNH 28432 was reassigned to Pholidosaurus and BMNH 41099 was referred to the retained name Petrosuchus laevidens. BMNH 28432 was designated as the lectotype of the new species Pholidosaurus decipiens, named in reference to Owen's oversight.[5]

Another species from England, P. purbeckensis, was originally described as a species of Steneosaurus in 1888.[9] The holotype is an almost complete cranium, referred to as DORCM G97, missing the anterior portion of the rostrum. The skull was found from either Swanage or the Isle of Purbeck (hence the species name), although the exact locality from which the skull originated is not specified by the author of the original description.[10] This material was also once referred to Macrorhynchus. The author of the 1888 description considered S. purbeckensis an intermediate form between Steneosaurus and Teleosaurus.[9] However, in 2002, a new study proposed that S. purbeckensis belonged to P. decipiens. Because the name S. purbeckensis had seniority over P. decipiens, but not the genus Pholidosaurus, the name Pholidosaurus purbeckensis is considered to have priority.[5]

Another species of Pholidosaurus, P. laevis, was named in 1913 from Swanage, based on a partial cranium known as BMNH R3414.[11] This has been considered a junior synonym of P. purbeckensis by both Salisbury et al. (1999) and Salisbury (2002).[5][12]

Classification

Phylogenetic position of Pholidosaurus
Sereno et al. 2001[13]
Neosuchia 



Sunosuchus



Goniopholis





Pholidosaurus




Dyrosaurus




Terminonaris



Sarcosuchus








Bernissartia



Crocodylia




Pol 2003[14]
Neosuchia 


Theriosuchus



Alligatorium






Sokotosuchus



Dyrosaurus





Pholidosaurus




Pelagosaurus




Teleosauridae



Metriorhynchidae







Eutretauranosuchus




Goniopholis




Bernissartia




Hylaeochampsa



Borealosuchus



Gavialis



Crocodylus



Alligator






Richard Lydekker assigned Pholidosaurus to the family Goniopholididae in 1887 along with Hylaeochampsa, Theriosuchus, Goniopholis, and Petrosuchus because the vertebrae are amphicoelus and the orbit communicates with the lateral temporal fossa.[3]

File:Pholidosaurus tooth.jpg
Possible Pholidosaurus tooth (DK164) at the Geological Museum in Copenhagen

Pholidosaurus has often been grouped with other longirostrine, or long-snouted, crocodylomorphs, including dyrosaurids and thalattosuchians. Buckley and Brochu (1999) concluded that Pholidosaurus, Sokotosuchus, Dyrosauridae, and Thalattosuchia formed a longirostrine clade that was the sister taxon to Crocodylia.[15] However, Thalattosuchia was traditionally considered a more basal clade of crocodylomorphs, being a more basal lineage of Mesoeucrocodylia than dyrosaurids or Pholidosaurus, both of which were considered neosuchians.[16] The results of the phylogenetic analysis by Buckley and Brochu (1999) were attributed to the similarity in characters associated with snout elongation seen in these crocodylomorphs, even though these characters may have been independently derived in each group. More recent studies have revealed Thalattosuchia as a more basal clade when dyrosaurids are removed from the data set.[17]

More recent studies show that Pholidosaurus is closely related to the Thalattosuchia, with both taxa closely related to a clade containing Terminonaris and the Dyrosauridae.[18] In a phylogenetic analysis conducted by Sereno et al. (2001), Pholidosaurus was placed as a distant sister taxon to the other longirostrine crocodylomorphs, with Terminonaris and the newly named Sarcosuchus being closely related to one another and Dyrosaurus being the next closest taxon to the group.[13] The later phylogenetic analysis of Brochu et al. (2002) again showed that Pholidosaurus was closely related to Thalattosuchia. In the study, both taxa formed a clade that was the sister taxon to a clade containing Sokotosuchus and Dyrosauridae.[19]

Pholidosaurus has recently been reassigned to the family Pholidosauridae, along with the genera Elosuchus, Sarcosuchus, and Termionaris. Jouve et al. (2006) concluded that Pholidosaurus was a pholidosaurid, although in their phylogenetic analysis, thalattosuchians were also included within the family, which would be considered paraphyletic without them. Jouve et al. (2006), like Buckley and Brochu (1999), attributed this result to phylogenetic problems that exist among longirostrine crocodylomorphs due to similarities in their morphology.[20]

References

  1. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  8. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. 9.0 9.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  10. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  11. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  12. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  13. 13.0 13.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  14. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  15. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  16. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  17. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  18. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  19. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  20. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links