Doyle v. Ohio
From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
| Doyle v. Ohio | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
| Argued February 23, 1976 Decided June 17, 1976 |
|||||
| Full case name | Doyle v. Ohio | ||||
| Citations | 426 U.S. 610 (more) | ||||
| Holding | |||||
| The defendant's silence in response to a Miranda warning cannot be used against them. | |||||
| Court membership | |||||
|
|||||
| Case opinions | |||||
| Majority | Powell, joined by Burger, Brennan, Stewart, White, Marshall | ||||
| Dissent | Stevens, joined by Blackmun, Rehnquist | ||||
Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610 (1976), is a United States Supreme Court case regarding the Due Process rights of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Holding
The Supreme Court held that the criminal defendant's silence in response to a Miranda warning cannot be used to impeach them during cross examination.
See also
- List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 426
- Jenkins v. Anderson, 447 U.S. 231 (1980)
- Oyez: Doyle v. Ohio 426 US 610 (1976)
Further reading
- Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
<templatestyles src="Asbox/styles.css"></templatestyles>
|
This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
