43rd Golden Raspberry Awards

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
43rd Golden Raspberry Awards
Awarded for Worst in film
Date March 10, 2023
Site Los Angeles, California
Highlights
Worst Picture Blonde
Most awards Blonde, Elvis and Morbius (2)
Most nominations Blonde (8)

The 43rd Golden Raspberry Awards, or Razzies, honored the worst the film industry had to offer in 2022 on March 10, 2023.[1][2][3][4] The awards are based on votes from members of the Golden Raspberry Foundation. The nominations were announced on January 22, 2023. The biographical psychological drama Blonde received the most nominations with eight, including Worst Picture and Worst Director (Andrew Dominik), winning the former and Worst Screenplay (Dominik).[1][5][6][7]

Winners and nominees

File:Dede Gardner (2017).jpg
Dede Gardner, Worst Picture co-winner
File:MGK 2021 VMA.jpg
Machine Gun Kelly, Worst Director co-winner
File:Mod Sun Derek Dylan Smith.jpg
Mod Sun, Worst Director co-winner
File:Tom Hanks at the Elvis Premiere 2022.jpg
Tom Hanks, Worst Supporting Actor winner and Worst Screen Combo co-winner
File:Adria Arjona 2022 (cropped).jpg
Adria Arjona, Worst Supporting Actress winner

Films with multiple wins and nominations

The following films received multiple nominations:

Films with multiple nominations
Nominations Film
8 Blonde
7 Good Mourning
6 Disney's Pinocchio
5 Morbius
3 Jurassic World Dominion
The King's Daughter
2 The 355
365 Days: This Day
Elvis
The Next 365 Days

The following films received multiple wins:

Films with multiple wins
Wins Film
2 Blonde
Elvis
Morbius

Controversy

The Worst Actress nomination of child actress Ryan Kiera Armstrong for her role in the Firestarter remake was the subject of backlash, alongside further criticism that child actors in the past had their careers harmed upon being nominated at the Razzies; such as Gary Coleman for On the Right Track (1981), Macaulay Culkin for Richie Rich (1994), and Jake Lloyd for Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace (1999). Fellow child actor Julian Hilliard said the Razzies "crossed a line" and that the nomination put Armstrong at the risk of "bullying or worse". Drew Barrymore, a former child actress and star of the original film, also criticized the decision, stating: "I don't like it... Because she is younger and it is bullying, and we do want to be cautious about how we speak to or about people because it encourages other people to join on that bandwagon, and I'm glad to see people didn't jump on the 'let's make fun of her' wave and instead said 'This isn't right.'"[8][10][11][12][13]

In the wake of the controversy, Razzies co-founder John J. B. Wilson explained that among the group's voters, Armstrong had come in fifth place out of five available spots and that, despite some concern due to her age (twelve when the nomination was announced), members approved the nomination on the grounds that Armstrong was a professional actress with prior experience. Wilson suggested that the level of criticism the nomination received was "overblown", but also conceded, stating: "The intent was to be funny. In this particular instance, we seem to have misstepped very badly. I would admit that."[14] Three days after the nomination was announced, Armstrong was removed from the ballot. Wilson issued a public apology and announced that the organization would no longer allow individuals under eighteen to be nominated in any category.[8]

In another surprise, for the first time in Razzies history, the organization gave itself an award: Worst Actress. After enduring the controversy of initially nominating Armstrong, the organization put themselves in Armstrong's place on the ballot; it won by a landslide.[1][8][15]

Notes

  1. Nomination rescinded[8]
  2. Considered a remake of Blonde, a 2001 CBS TV film[9]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  10. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  11. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  12. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  13. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  14. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  15. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links